New Maya Discovery Casts Doubt on World's Imminent Demise

Recommended Videos

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
It's bad enough to have to sit through all the 2012 debate, but could people at least get it right? The mayans didn't predict the end of the world. Their calender has a very large period of time in it and supposedly(as we can't tell exactly when their calender even started counting), on dec 21, 2012 one of these periods is ending and a new one is beginning.

They predicted that every time this cycle rolled over, bad things would happen/had happened, but they never thought the world would be destroyed. I think that this change in cycles is supposed to coincide with an alignment between Earth, the Sun, and the Galactic center, which is why they thought natural disasters occurred en mass, during those transitions. It's not like they thought the earth was just going to stop existing, they just predicted that major natural disasters would happen all over the world on that day.

Therefore, even if dec 2012 is this transition day, it's highly probable they would have continued to map out Earth's travel through space beyond that date.
 

MrFalconfly

New member
Sep 5, 2011
913
0
0
So basically what they are saying is that they've found another calender that doesn't end Dec. 21st 2012 but 9012?

It's either this or some major backpedalling from all the Nibiru-proponents since we aren't seeing a brown dwarf screaming towards the inner solar system (or any other part of the solar-system).
 

superdelux

New member
Apr 29, 2011
343
0
0
Can the world just end already, I've had guns, ammunition, and bottle-caps piling up under my bed for years now.
 

ElPatron

New member
Jul 18, 2011
2,130
0
0
Pffft, my calendar goes up to 2675 or something. The Mayans predicted even more 7000 years? That's cool.

superdelux said:
Can the world just end already, I've had guns, ammunition, and bottle-caps piling up under my bed for years now.
*BROFIST*
 

Signa

Noisy Lurker
Legacy
Jul 16, 2008
4,746
6
43
Country
USA
Therumancer said:
Personally I think it will be just another day, but if I had to pick a crackpot theory to embrace I'd go for "return of the ancient aliens" because there is at least some circulstantial evidence, if weak circumstantial evidence. 12/21/12 being the day the aliens that seeded humanity or whatever, check back.
I'd love for this to be true. It makes the acts of God in the bible make a lot more sense, and it would be an explanation for the Mayan's high-level understanding of the stars for such an early civilization. We have advanced to a point where a LARGE section of the population would be willing to accept non-humans interacting with us. Kinda like a timer version of the Stargate episode where where they find the Asgard testing chamber to test the people if they are ready to see aliens instead of gods.

OT: I'm failing to understand what the article is actually saying that would convince me that 12/21/12 isn't "the day". It reeks of someone trying to convince all the believers that nothing is going to happen in December. We should actually be trying harder to disprove the December date, because I know someone is going to die because of the belief in it.
 

R Man

New member
Dec 19, 2007
149
0
0
Farther than stars said:
That's fascinating. I do have one question though. Were the five unlucky days not counted in the calendar or did they have a seperate solar calendar from the Long Count calendar?
They had several calendars. The two basic were the Solar Calendar, like ours, and a religious calendar based on 260 days. There were a few others, such as the Lunar calendar, but I'm not very familiar. The 5 unlucky days belong to the solar year. The solar year is divided into 18 'months' of twenty days each with its own 'theme'. The five unlucky days do not belong to a month and are therefore, not part of the system. Hence the unlucky aspect.

Well, not really. Can you recognize god when you see one? After all, according to christian belief we are made in gods image. Atztecs actually loked at us as gods even after we destroyed their capital. They still wouldn't fight because "you cant fight gods". Of course eventually they fought, when they realized we arent the gods shamans told them about, but their pretty blinding date did allow us to match though whole land of theirs without being attacked when we first came. And it is because they though we were gods.
Was christ a god? no. Would you dare to kill him if he showed up at your shore-city? doubtful. Its all about perception.
What bollocks. The Aztecs did not mistake Cortes for a god. They mistook him for a diplomat. This is why Montezuma did not attack him, it would be shameful to attack an embassy. And the Aztecs put up one of the most vicious and desperate defences in history. It took months of warfare, a three month siege and smallpox to defeat the Aztecs. It cost Cortes around 400 soldiers and 20 000 of his native allies, who did most of the fighting. Forget Romans, Samurai and Knights, Aztec Warriors were easily the bravest of them all.
 

Clive Howlitzer

New member
Jan 27, 2011
2,781
0
0
I wonder how many people who sold all their stuff, had insane credit card bills, all betting on the end of days are going to try and sue the Mayans for false advertising.
 

Clive Howlitzer

New member
Jan 27, 2011
2,781
0
0
R Man said:
Farther than stars said:
That's fascinating. I do have one question though. Were the five unlucky days not counted in the calendar or did they have a seperate solar calendar from the Long Count calendar?
They had several calendars. The two basic were the Solar Calendar, like ours, and a religious calendar based on 260 days. There were a few others, such as the Lunar calendar, but I'm not very familiar. The 5 unlucky days belong to the solar year. The solar year is divided into 18 'months' of twenty days each with its own 'theme'. The five unlucky days do not belong to a month and are therefore, not part of the system. Hence the unlucky aspect.

Well, not really. Can you recognize god when you see one? After all, according to christian belief we are made in gods image. Atztecs actually loked at us as gods even after we destroyed their capital. They still wouldn't fight because "you cant fight gods". Of course eventually they fought, when they realized we arent the gods shamans told them about, but their pretty blinding date did allow us to match though whole land of theirs without being attacked when we first came. And it is because they though we were gods.
Was christ a god? no. Would you dare to kill him if he showed up at your shore-city? doubtful. Its all about perception.
What bollocks. The Aztecs did not mistake Cortes for a god. They mistook him for a diplomat. This is why Montezuma did not attack him, it would be shameful to attack an embassy. And the Aztecs put up one of the most vicious and desperate defences in history. It took months of warfare, a three month siege and smallpox to defeat the Aztecs. It cost Cortes around 400 soldiers and 20 000 of his native allies, who did most of the fighting. Forget Romans, Samurai and Knights, Aztec Warriors were easily the bravest of them all.
Most people have a pretty skewed perspective of history mostly gleaned from popular sources rather than factual evidence.
 

Right Hook

New member
May 29, 2011
946
0
0
Somethingfake said:
SonOfVoorhees said:
Yeah but what idiot would even believe the Mayan prediction in the first place? Did we really need a scientist to find proof that it was all bullshit? Really?
You're talking about a race that honestly believed the rapture was nigh and sold all of their belongings because a mad man told them to.
Yeah, there was already endless proof that it wasn't happening and that this was just the end of a calendar cycle. Anyone who did any research or was slightly intelligent knew it wasn't happening but this is the news that will finally calm the unwashed masses.
 

Patathatapon

New member
Jul 30, 2011
225
0
0
jurnag12 said:
What, new discoveries cast doubt on the World's imminent demise?
Didn't common sense already kick it in the jimmies the second that some idiot started blathering about it?
I mean, come on, even the current Mayan priests are saying that the end of the calendar doesn't equal the end of the world, and people are still going apeshit over it?
I'm almost hoping for an actual extinction level-event to happen so our entire damn species can stop being so mind-numbingly stupid at times.
Indeed.

If we believed the world would end every time our calendar ended then... I don't even want to think about it...
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,607
0
0
It's rather sad that we need to actually debunk these in the first place.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,908
0
0
Signa said:
Therumancer said:
Personally I think it will be just another day, but if I had to pick a crackpot theory to embrace I'd go for "return of the ancient aliens" because there is at least some circulstantial evidence, if weak circumstantial evidence. 12/21/12 being the day the aliens that seeded humanity or whatever, check back.
I'd love for this to be true. It makes the acts of God in the bible make a lot more sense, and it would be an explanation for the Mayan's high-level understanding of the stars for such an early civilization. We have advanced to a point where a LARGE section of the population would be willing to accept non-humans interacting with us. Kinda like a timer version of the Stargate episode where where they find the Asgard testing chamber to test the people if they are ready to see aliens instead of gods.

OT: I'm failing to understand what the article is actually saying that would convince me that 12/21/12 isn't "the day". It reeks of someone trying to convince all the believers that nothing is going to happen in December. We should actually be trying harder to disprove the December date, because I know someone is going to die because of the belief in it.
Hmmm, well I don't think we're going to see much happen as it is. There was a lot of concern over "Millenium Madness" and when I was working Casino Security we were on high alert other than the crowds for the entire time, expecting crazies to come popping out of the woodwork, and really nothing happened. Anyone who was concerned about it, mostly just stayed home. I expect the same to happen here.

As far as the article goes, you have to understand that belief is in short supply in the western world. Nobody wants to be laughed at as the person reacting to something that isn't going to happen. During an actual emergency, the biggest threat is people not wanting to take the word of the authorities for it, and won't do anything until they actually see the danger. Clearing casino patrons for say a bomb threat, people will generally be more concerned about their money or whatever than the threat of potentially being blown up. A point that occasionally makes me think that the authorities, including pseudo-authorities like security forces, should be issued tasers and truncheons and a free reign to use them for people's own good in times of emergency. False alarm or not, if the guy in the uniform or the right ID tells you to clear out you should F@cking clear out without question, because all the time explaining things to you means someone else isn't being cleared. A whack or zap, load the people onto some of those coin trolleys, no legal appeals, and attitudes will be adjusted for the better when it comes to this kind of thing. Of course I do understand why that will never happen, though I used to feel it should.

At any rate, the point is lack of reaction, and the desire to inherantly deny anything that a person cannot actually see. As a result people are expecting nothing to happen with this date, and don't want to be seen as some laughable reactionary (we see those taking action or showing concern already being mocked), and everyone wants to be the first to "debunk" the concern now that it's on the horizon so they can say "I told you so" with authority. The sheer amount of time this prophecy has been around makes it a popular target. Anything
people can use right now to say it's not going to happen, is being used, and interpeted in that direction.

As far as the rest goes, to really debunk this before the fact, someone would have to prove to a virtual certainy how the Aztecs/Mayans and other peoples from the region were able to get and shape stone on that level, especially given that some of the stone isn't even from the same continent. Remember this is from a bunch of primitives who didn't have sea-faring technology, and hadn't really conceived of it before they ran into Eurpeans (mostly Spanish) who had it. We're talking a complete lack of even coast hugging ships, and no real knowlege of the rest of the continents.

A big part of the mystery is of course how these guys knew so much about the stars, yet lacked other fundemental technologies. Not to mention depictions of things that appeared to be space ships or flying machines, which were common to not only Aztec/Mayan/Incan ruins but also other cases of advanced stone construction throughout the world. Then there is also the issue of mathematical perfection in construction (like in Egypt) that can't be duplicated with modern tools, never mind what a bunch of people that couldn't even make a decent boat could have had.

Of course one of the big reasons why this isn't looked at more is western stupidity, which is why it's mostly fodder for TV specials and occasional coverage as "ancient mysteries" in discount books and such. Right now "insulting" indiginous populations by pointing out that they apparently accomplish what they were once thought to have done is not popular. Especially seeing as the descendants of those people have a vested monetary interest in those sites and ruins, and a claim based on their ancestors having built them. Hence why there have been admissions that these ancient peoples found the structures, and mostly squatted there while doing maitnence, you have to really read on the subject to find that out, and it's frequently attacked due to fear that they will lose claim to these sites (and tourism/achaeology money) and have them become what amounts to public property, either internationally or by the nations those ruins are otherwise in.

To really succeed here in proving this was all BS, someone would have to do the impossible by explaining how an Ancient Mayan obtained stone (Quartz, Granite, etc..) from all the way accross the planet without the technology to do so. Yes, some materials came from local quarries and such, and maitnence was done, but there is apparently a huge differance between their work and the really ancient stoneworks which is where geologists have found evidence of the stone coming from a long ways off apparently.

At any rate, I doubt we'll get out answer on 12/21/12, but the beliefs stand on their own. Personally, as "cool" as it might be, I think that the date is mostly Mayan supposition, something they probably came up with seperate from the origin of those ruins.

At any rate, time will tell, I'll be at home doing my think, and getting ready for Christmas like every year.
 

porpoise hork

Fly Fatass!! Fly!!!
Dec 26, 2008
297
0
0
DVS BSTrD said:
But, But...But what was on the Disks?
Daystar Clarion said:
You mean the world really isn't going to end?



When did we start trusting the predictions of ancient civilisations anyway?
Since they started writing them down.
http://www.providencebiblefellowship.org/home/140005880/140005880/expository%20teaching%20bible%20church%20virginia.jpg
Too bad these "predictions" were written down by monks after the events actually happened. Monks were the select few for hundreds of years that were learned scholars so they were in charge of making duplicates of the bible. So it stands to reason that certain aspects of these stories changed to suit the needs and agendas of the religious leaders of the time. This practice continued up till the point of the moveable printing press came to be and the bible started getting mass produced and the common person began to learn to read.

Then History went one way and Revelations went another.
 

Fbuh

New member
Feb 3, 2009
1,233
0
0
Furioso said:
The end of a calendar doesn't predict the end of the world? Color me shocked, my word a day calendar ends early in the year 2013, I was getting all set to be ready for the end by then...
My Sports Illustrated Swim Suit Edition 2012 calendar is only for this year? THe world must be ending after that!!!
 

Farther than stars

New member
Jun 19, 2011
1,228
0
0
R Man said:
Farther than stars said:
That's fascinating. I do have one question though. Were the five unlucky days not counted in the calendar or did they have a seperate solar calendar from the Long Count calendar?
They had several calendars. The two basic were the Solar Calendar, like ours, and a religious calendar based on 260 days. There were a few others, such as the Lunar calendar, but I'm not very familiar. The 5 unlucky days belong to the solar year. The solar year is divided into 18 'months' of twenty days each with its own 'theme'. The five unlucky days do not belong to a month and are therefore, not part of the system. Hence the unlucky aspect.
That's very interesting. It speaks a lot of their psychological character to condemn a mathematical inconsistency within the calendar brought about by their own parameters.
Also, I have a follow-up question: I assume that the five and quarter 'missing' days each year are taken into consideration when translating the Mayan calendar into our own calendar? Otherwise after 5000 years we'd be missing a couple of years...
 

bluegate

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 28, 2010
2,787
1,381
118
Well then, what will be the next big thing to trick all the stupid people of the world?
 

R Man

New member
Dec 19, 2007
149
0
0
Farther than stars said:
That's very interesting. It speaks a lot of their psychological character to condemn a mathematical inconsistency within the calendar brought about by their own parameters.
Also, I have a follow-up question: I assume that the five and quarter 'missing' days each year are taken into consideration when translating the Mayan calendar into our own calendar? Otherwise after 5000 years we'd be missing a couple of years...
Yes. We've been aware of it pretty much since shortly after first contact.

At any rate, I doubt we'll get out answer on 12/21/12, but the beliefs stand on their own. Personally, as "cool" as it might be, I think that the date is mostly Mayan supposition, something they probably came up with seperate from the origin of those ruins.
The hell? What are you on about? The point is, Mayanist and Mesoamerican specialists have debunked it. They also have explanations for those points that you bring up. The truth is the Apocalypse is a Western Christian belief, and has been so for thousands of years.
 

PurePareidolia

New member
Nov 26, 2008
354
0
0
Seriously? the end of the world is "delayed" now that we found an even longer Mayan calendar?

Also whoever came up with captchas where we have to describe actual brands we may or may not have heard of can go die in a fire. A lot.
 

naab

New member
Jun 4, 2009
98
0
0
We survived the year 2000.

We survived 2006/06/06

We survived 2011/11/11

And holy crap looked at that... We're gonna survive 2012.