That's going on my hard drive.vxicepickxv said:I guess they the Wii stopped printing money.
![]()
I second this notion, will be interested to see what Nintendo produce although it would take some pretty damn impressive hardware/innovation/exclusvies to pull me away from my 360.chickenhound said:just please nitendo go back to normal conrollers!
My point is that Nintendo isn't terrible by any means in the technical department.OutrageousEmu said:The xbox was the most powerful - whats your point?Onyx Oblivion said:The 360 is over 5 years old, and the PS3 is about the same. It can probably be more powerful then them if the Big N wants it to be. Contrary to popular belief, in the last generation, the PS2 was the least powerful from a graphical standpointdmase said:"significantly more powerful than the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360"
![]()
Mario's nose is growing...
I'll believe it when I see it.
Oh right, as for that part, I think it's just plain wrong. There are no hard facts about this console after all.Xzi said:An upgrade that's more powerful than the 360/PS3? Don't think your analogy really fits.danpascooch said:Who wants to bet this new console is to the Wii as the Xbox slim was to the Xbox
I doubt it's really the next big generation, probably just an upgrade.
That said, I don't really care anyway, Nintendo is going to have to do something BIG to get my trust back after the Wii, it's like I've been saying for years, they fucked over their stable fanbase for a quick cash in, and now it's starting to hurt them long run.
OT: Glad to hear it. Seeing Nintendo beat them out hardware-wise might convince Sony and Microsoft to get up off their fat asses and stop holding back the industry. By this point Nintendo could easily develop a console which has twice the power of the 360/PS3 and only cost $100 to $150 than they do currently.
The timing is what makes the generation, you can't call it a different generation just because they chose not to put expensive hardware in it. The Wii came out to compete with the 360 and PS3, which makes it part of their generation.OutrageousEmu said:The Wii is 7th generation in timing only - its hardware (the thing that defines generations) is purely 6th generation. Thus, this will be them finally joining the 7th generation. As such, its launching to compete with the 360 and Ps3. So it will launch with a higher price point and an install base of zero, versus the Ps3 and 360's 55 million by that point.danpascooch said:What? This doesn't make any sense, This isn't Nintendo "joining" the current generation, that was the Wii, which is starting to fail.OutrageousEmu said:What, before 2005? Even if this is true (which it probably isn't, given how this rumour pops up every single year), this is Nintendo joining the current generation, not starting a new one.Verlander said:Interested. I reckon they announce it at E3, and release it late 2012, before Microsoft or Sony can get to launch.
Which means Nintendo is launching a new console 5 years after the release of the old ones for a much higher price, with a lower install base.
Making a more expensive console is how each new generation comes about, what makes you think it will have a lower install base?
Plus, I haven't seen a single article about Nintendo making a next generation console and I've been reading the headlines on this site every day for two years (two years the day after tomorrow)
No, silly, like how Sony ripped off the rumble pack AND ANALOG STICK for the PSOne. Nearly all major control innovations have come from Nintendo. Also, hit and run time.OutrageousEmu said:You mean like how Sony ripped off the Game.Com for the DS? Or how Sony ripped off the dual thumbstick design for the Gamecube?randommaster said:No, you're thinking of what Sony does..ryai458 said:So, will they copy the 360 or Ps3?
...wait.....
N64 was infinitely more powerful than the PSOne. Think about it. How many actually 3 dimensional games did the playstation have? Playing Resident Evil, Metal Gear Solid or Tomb Raider was like getting stuck in a jaggie storm. Walk toward a wall 10 feet away and the thing turns into a dancing Picasso. I know the N64 had lots of fog, but that's just the burden it had to shoulder being the first 3D system ever.danpascooch said:Oh right, as for that part, I think it's just plain wrong. There are no hard facts about this console after all.Xzi said:An upgrade that's more powerful than the 360/PS3? Don't think your analogy really fits.danpascooch said:Who wants to bet this new console is to the Wii as the Xbox slim was to the Xbox
I doubt it's really the next big generation, probably just an upgrade.
That said, I don't really care anyway, Nintendo is going to have to do something BIG to get my trust back after the Wii, it's like I've been saying for years, they fucked over their stable fanbase for a quick cash in, and now it's starting to hurt them long run.
OT: Glad to hear it. Seeing Nintendo beat them out hardware-wise might convince Sony and Microsoft to get up off their fat asses and stop holding back the industry. By this point Nintendo could easily develop a console which has twice the power of the 360/PS3 and only cost $100 to $150 than they do currently.
Think about it, Gamecube vs. Xbox and PS3. N64 vs PS1
When has Nintendo ever had a console more powerful than the other front runners on the market?
danpascooch said:N64, and it sold a third of the number of systems as the PS1. Graphics quality proves to be meaningless.Xzi said:Oh right, as for that part, I think it's just plain wrong. There are no hard facts about this console after all.
Think about it, Gamecube vs. Xbox and PS3. N64 vs PS1
When has Nintendo ever had a console more powerful than the other front runners on the market?
Edit: DAMN! Ninja'd by seconds!
Yes, the interesting question here is; Can it run Crysis?thatstheguy said:More powerful than the 360 and PS3?
Could we expect, say, CryEngine 2/3 on the platform? That's something I'd be interested in.