New PS3 Update Kills Jailbreak

Recommended Videos

DigitalSushi

a gallardo? fine, I'll take it.
Dec 24, 2008
5,717
0
0
thenumberthirteen said:
ColdStorage said:
thenumberthirteen said:
You know I remember when a PS3 update used to add new features. When are they going to update the flash player, or implement cross game chat, or do something besides cover their asses?
I guess I'm the only person in the world that doesn't want cross gaming chat, last thing I want to hear is someone capturing Tango in MW2 while I'm trying to play KillZone 2.
Well I'm not too bothered about it, but it means I can chat with my friends without having to quit my game. I'd rather have a better browser so I can watch my streaming movies from the lovefilm website in my living room. Of course my PS3 YLOD'd yesterday so I'm not going to be doing any of that.

ohhh ouch, what model did you have?.

I've just done a minutes silence in your PS3's honour.
 

Modus Operandi

New member
Mar 11, 2010
34
0
0
WilliamRLBaker said:
As soon as the deeper levels of the system were cracked it was a lost cause.
That's the thing, they weren't. From what I've been able to gather, it's some sort of hacked development kit, the person using it is in essence pretending to be a licensed game developer so that the PS3 will allow unlicensed software to run. The backup launcher or whatever it's called is one such unlicensed software. That is not to say that this won't eventually unleash the long-held-back hacker hordes who will crack the system itself, but so far it hasn't happened. Then again I might be wrong, of course, only working on what I've been able to dig up from Google.
 

Mistermixmaster

New member
Aug 4, 2009
1,057
0
0
Corpse XxX said:
I hope Sony wins this..

Hackers make it worse for people who pay up fair and square..
I wholeheartily agree. Can't hackers go back to what they used to do before hacking? ...oh wait...

Anyhow, I'm rooting for Sony, and here's hoping that the hackers DIAF. (Sorry if this insults anyone, this is just my own personal opinion).
 

Modus Operandi

New member
Mar 11, 2010
34
0
0
Sinclose said:
The knowledge that while they're paying for their games, there are no longer people out there who get the exact same service illegally for free.
The number of pirates was reduced, sure, but it's a long cry from "they are no longer". You can still buy the old models all over the internet; all you can say for sure is that pirates won't be upgrading to the 3000 and Go models any time soon, that's about it.

What I mean is, Sony won the "arms race" against hackers in the end (as they are bound to with their own platform and especially if it needs to connect to their servers like the PS3), but that only stopped the piracy form spreading, not in any way eliminate the models already hacked.
 

LandoCristo

New member
Apr 2, 2010
560
0
0
On one hand, I support Sony's right to enforce anti-pirating and keeping their system intact, but on the other hand:

DAMN, those hackers are good. It'd be a shame for them to all get sued or something. I kinda respect people who'll look a giant like Sony in the eye, and say "SCREW YOU"
 

Jared

The British Paladin
Jul 14, 2009
5,630
0
0
Well, thats one way to shut them down - and avoid messy legal battles. Hat goes off to Sony
 

happy_turtle

New member
Apr 11, 2010
191
0
0
Well the hacks have already been modified to get past the new firmware. This is gonna be more or less a game of tennis with Sony releasing a patch to block the latest hacks.

It's a shame as the only people that suffer is the legit users who have to download 160MB sized patches every week. (on my slow connection it takes about half an hour in total to download and install)

Why don't Sony simply block the machines that are pirating from the PSN like MS did? Instead of messing about with a losing battle
 

thenumberthirteen

Unlucky for some
Dec 19, 2007
4,789
0
0
ColdStorage said:
thenumberthirteen said:
ColdStorage said:
thenumberthirteen said:
You know I remember when a PS3 update used to add new features. When are they going to update the flash player, or implement cross game chat, or do something besides cover their asses?
I guess I'm the only person in the world that doesn't want cross gaming chat, last thing I want to hear is someone capturing Tango in MW2 while I'm trying to play KillZone 2.
Well I'm not too bothered about it, but it means I can chat with my friends without having to quit my game. I'd rather have a better browser so I can watch my streaming movies from the lovefilm website in my living room. Of course my PS3 YLOD'd yesterday so I'm not going to be doing any of that.

ohhh ouch, what model did you have?.

I've just done a minutes silence in your PS3's honour.
It was the best model the 60gb launch model (expanded to 120gb) with backwards compatibility and card readers.
 

Rauten

Capitalism ho!
Apr 4, 2010
452
0
0
I hope Sony gets what's coming at it.
Gotta be REALLY REALLY stupid, seriously, just INCREDIBLY stupid, to take out Linux functionality when you KNOW it's what's keeping the hackers/crackers/scene/howeverthehellyouwannacallthem from cracking your system to dust.

Sony asked for this, and I really hope the scene grants them their wishes. In spades. (Mind you, this is not a pro-piracy statement, I don't even have a PS3 myself, I just wish to see stupidity punished).

Jaredin said:
Well, thats one way to shut them down - and avoid messy legal battles. Hat goes off to Sony
Oh yes, shut down. The code has already been released throughout the internet and being rewritten for use in iPods, iPads, iPhones, PSPs, several kinds of smartphones, and even the bloody DualShock 3 itself.
It's only a matter of time before they find a way through this, if they haven't already.
 

oranger

New member
May 27, 2008
704
0
0
Nope, after they released the ps3.5 (the so-called "slim"), sony will never again get sympathy from me.
After all, I paid fair bit o' cash for one of the first models, and then blam, it was obsolete like sony had been sitting on slightly better tech all along...
And even if they hadn't had the tech at the time, it was wrong of them to expect me to buy the system twice.
 

oranger

New member
May 27, 2008
704
0
0
happy_turtle said:
Well the hacks have already been modified to get past the new firmware. This is gonna be more or less a game of tennis with Sony releasing a patch to block the latest hacks.

It's a shame as the only people that suffer is the legit users who have to download 160MB sized patches every week. (on my slow connection it takes about half an hour in total to download and install)

Why don't Sony simply block the machines that are pirating from the PSN like MS did? Instead of messing about with a losing battle
It probably has something to do with the system working as advertised or a law somewhere.
Or you know, they are smart enough to realize that the ire they'd create by doing so is not really worth it.
 

Rayansaki

New member
May 5, 2009
960
0
0
Generic Gamer said:
This is about what happened with the PSP and the hackers won that arms-race, this should be interesting to watch. I'm on Sony's side in this but that doesn't really matter.
There is a major difference however. There were big periods between CFW builds during which you couldn't go online, and even now going online is hard on cfw.
That isn't a big deal for the PSP, the console is mostly used on the move, most games don't have online, and even those that do, you usually don't buy them to play online.
PS3 on the other hand has a lot of online content, and a console that can't go online loses 50% of its features, so long periods of time with no online means a lot users of the pirated software will give up.

There are still those who don't care about online on the PS3, but its significantly less than those who don't care about online on the PSP.
 

KEM10

New member
Oct 22, 2008
725
0
0
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
I carry a very pessimistic view of people, especially people in power, until they prove otherwise. Example: The Pittsburgh Pirates baseball team is constantly one of the lowest payroll teams in the game, trading off star players to keep the payroll down. Last month, it was found that the team's executives made $30 Million while the team suffered in last place. Then the team raised ticket prices for next year.

When JP Morgan went under for the whole bank subsidy problem that has effectively damaged the U.S. economy, the top members took the money the government gave them to stay afloat, and paid massive bonuses to the top members just before the company collapsed.

Money makes the world go round, and the people in power know this better than anyone. Money gets distributed from the top down, not the other way around. The lower workers always gets their minimum wage, therefore, all the profits that pirates steal, come out of the top members pocket books.

When you make money, you deserve it for your work. When you raise prices, then don't pay the real workers at the bottom, you're doing something morally wrong.
1) How many Pittsburgh Pirate fans do you know of? Or the Red Skins in football? There is a supply/demand factor in their numbers that makes the owner think if they could earn more by under playing their team and operating at optimal costs (what EVERY business does) or do I attempt to bankrupt myself and try to run it closer to my costs equaling my revenue. If you are so inclined to the "true sportsmanship of potential teams" like that, cheer for the Packers or just watch the European league.

2) JP Morgan paid their think tank (mostly) with that money. You can get another bank teller anywhere, but people who go to school for math and econ (hello) are considerably harder to come by. There is a reason why actuaries are one of the highest paying professions out there.

3) And who says that the owners (who had to fork over a ton of cash to own these franchises) didn't "earn" their money when they look at the numbers and decide to change one of the variables? Go tell that theory to a business analyst, all they do is attempt to trim the fat of corporations to make them run smoother by looking at numbers and changing ticket prices.

I will assume that you like the PS3 (you have the PSN badge after all) and so do I. However, if the hackers completely dominate the system (as you are hoping for in your posts) then the people on top won't make anything for it because there will be no returns. They will ultimately stop making games for it, and then everyone is SOL. Then you will be stuck with an out dated system because they went bankrupt attempting to fight them, or they released a PS4 that has higher anti-hacking definitions.
 

Rayansaki

New member
May 5, 2009
960
0
0
Denamic said:
Rooting for the hackers.
Closed systems are bad.

'Legit' users are annoyed because the DRM crap is up their asses being annoying.
While the hackers hack precisely because the DRM is annoying.
Well, some of them. I'm sure many just want free games.
Publishers need to get a clue and understand that you don't beat piracy by punishing legit users.
There was no DRM crap on PS3 that would interfere in any way with the legit user, so everything else in your logic is useless.
 

Modus Operandi

New member
Mar 11, 2010
34
0
0
oranger said:
After all, I paid fair bit o' cash for one of the first models, and then blam, it was obsolete like sony had been sitting on slightly better tech all along...
And even if they hadn't had the tech at the time, it was wrong of them to expect me to buy the system twice.
What do the newer models have that the older ones don't? I'm still using a 40GB version (3rd release I think it was) expanded to 120 GB and haven't found any logical reason whatsoever to upgrade... are the older models missing something compared to the new ones?
 

DigitalSushi

a gallardo? fine, I'll take it.
Dec 24, 2008
5,717
0
0
thenumberthirteen said:
ColdStorage said:
thenumberthirteen said:
ColdStorage said:
thenumberthirteen said:
You know I remember when a PS3 update used to add new features. When are they going to update the flash player, or implement cross game chat, or do something besides cover their asses?
I guess I'm the only person in the world that doesn't want cross gaming chat, last thing I want to hear is someone capturing Tango in MW2 while I'm trying to play KillZone 2.
Well I'm not too bothered about it, but it means I can chat with my friends without having to quit my game. I'd rather have a better browser so I can watch my streaming movies from the lovefilm website in my living room. Of course my PS3 YLOD'd yesterday so I'm not going to be doing any of that.

ohhh ouch, what model did you have?.

I've just done a minutes silence in your PS3's honour.
It was the best model the 60gb launch model (expanded to 120gb) with backwards compatibility and card readers.
Holy sweet Mary mother of Jesus, I too have one of those, the PS3 Model C (I believe its called), the card reader cover is currently open at "half mast" in respect of a fallen comrade.
 

rembrandtqeinstein

New member
Sep 4, 2009
2,173
0
0
Do all you corporate ass-kissers realize that Sony stole the Other OS feature from legit, paying customers? Is that perfectly OK with you?

And before anyone spouts the "don't run it online if you want the Other OS" crap, you need to understand the implied agreement in any software purchase. Customers know they are buying product that isn't necessarily perfect, however they expect to get updates which move the software closer to perfect and maybe add some implied but not implemented features.
 

Modus Operandi

New member
Mar 11, 2010
34
0
0
Belladonnah said:
There was no DRM crap on PS3 that would interfere in any way with the legit user, so everything else in your logic is useless.
If having to have the disc in the drive on the PC is considered cumbersome DRM, wouldn't the same be true for the consoles, when they have the capacity to install the game on the drive?

Also, if your console is lost/stolen or broken (and you don't want to pay $150+shipping for repairs), you automatically lose access to any and all PSN video content, both already purchased and any you might want to buy/rent in the future. You can only regain access if you manage to convince a Sony representative to restore it for you, which has to be done over the telephone, is not easy and ends in a failure more often than not, if Internet is to be believed. The DRM on PSN game content is more lenient (you get 5 chances instead of 1), but it's still the same system.
 

Royas

New member
Apr 25, 2008
539
0
0
The hackers always, ALWAYS, win. This will be no different.

It's the right of the customer to do with their hardware as they wish, including hacking it. It's the right of Sony to make their updates mandatory for online access. Sony, however, will always lose in the long run, the hackers are smarter and more numerous. And all it takes is one of them figuring it out for the entire world to have access to the new hack. Hell, but fighting the jail breaking so hard, all Sony is doing it putting a gigantic target on their backs, the good hackers like nothing so much as a challenge.

Wonder how much money Sony is going to spend on this bullshit before they recognize the futility of their situation.