Also, guys (general statement), can we cut the celebration? This study is just as likely to be flawed and biased as the contradicting ones, but of course this one we assume is true because it says what we want to hear. One experiment is on our side, several have been against us. By balance of probability it's more likely
this one is false but of course we don't think like that do we? God but we suck at analysing data! This is a finding conducted by two assistant researchers at non highly regarded universities, maybe wait.
It also dismays me that this is considered a common sense finding considering how volcanically inept at social interaction a good portion of gamers seem and that smoking was assumed to be good for you for years. So the findings aren't relevant to the normal high-risk group and buck the normal trend. Common sense is wrong more times than you'd think, there's a lot that is considered common sense that is bloody wrong so don't crack out the bunting just yet!
Incidentally it's a re-analysis of old data, not new research and it's not clear who funded it.
EDIT: And looked at a sample of less than 120 individuals.
Kharloth said:
Wow, that registered a 10 on the obvious meter.
great job, now can we move on to curing cancer?
Newsflash, psychologists are not biologists. Mind blowing I know, but not every scientist works in the right field to cure cancer!