God help us all.Condor219 said:Internet War One would start up if this happened.Father Time said:Now why doesn't Anonymous attack them?
They are just black hats at this point.
God help us all.Condor219 said:Internet War One would start up if this happened.Father Time said:Now why doesn't Anonymous attack them?
They are just black hats at this point.
They already hack each other. Internet war? has been engaged for years. LulzSec are noobs in it.halo3rulzer said:God help us all.Condor219 said:Internet War One would start up if this happened.Father Time said:Now why doesn't Anonymous attack them?
They are just black hats at this point.
Fair enough then. I don't see what information could be stolen though - if lulzsec wanted account information that badly they can easily do it themselves manually for each personJET1971 said:-snip-
Isn't the 4chan mantra 'don't feed the troll'?Ultratwinkie said:Oh really? She threatened physical violence (as if she could do anything) in a fake "gangsta" way, acted like a brat, and posted semi-naked pictures on the web. Anonymous called her out, and she tried to take them on. She took on anonymous and anonymous won. If you don't know not to poke a bear, darwinism will get you. A universal law handed down to us, an infallible law. If you don't know the environment enough to stay away from the dangers, then you cannot complain.Clipclop said:I refuse to go into this retarded argument for the 100,000,000.JasonKaotic said:Just throwing in a mention, if you're on about Jessi Slaughter, the situation was really exaggerated. They trolled her because she was arrogant, she milked all the sympathy she could get out of it.Clipclop said:bullied that girl
She was a 12 year old girl, nothing she could have done warrants the "justice" of 100,000 21+ man children breathing down her neck. hopefully when you have kids you'll realize how utterly psychopathic anon actually is.
If you act like an ass in front of that many people, and someone brings you down a peg then you cannot pretend to be the victim. She said she wouldn't do it again after the first time, after that interview she posted more explicit naked pictures and more shit 10x as bad than her first set of posts. Anon actually tracked what she did after the attack on 4chan, and she learned NOTHING. Her father even smacked her for doing the same shit again only worse, and he was arrested for it. It turns out she put on fake theatrical blood to try to free herself from her father so she can get more attention. Jessi wasn't a victim, she learned no lesson, and she only escalated in her activities after the attack. Now anonymous made sure she regrets the day she even made those second set of pictures, as they found their way back to her pool of family of friends.
If you antagonize a bear and get mauled, its your own damn fault. If you antagonize a bear only to get mauled, and antagonize it again then that is a whole new level of retarded. Her age and gender means nothing. Baby animals die and get hurt all the time due to stupidity, that is the natural world.
Anyone who actually read the details of the story and the story after her second episode would know it was her own fault. You don't take on a bear and expect to come out on top let alone doing it again.
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/jessi-slaughter
Read up on her inability to learn from mistakes before you take the "oh but she is just a child that messed up once" route. If you bash your head against the wall, its your own fault when your head starts bleeding.
Until they hack a company that you have information on. Like a bank, or The Escapist. I can guarantee you'll mind it a lot than.hellsdinner said:Don't really mind LulzSec, their main goal is trying to get company's to increase their online defenses right?
That can be mitigated by increasing security. The vast majority of these attacks have only been successful because they exploit widely-known holes. They could've been avoided had the companies in question even bothered to do basic audits.Dragonborne88 said:Until they hack a company that you have information on. Like a bank, or The Escapist. I can guarantee you'll mind it a lot than.hellsdinner said:Don't really mind LulzSec, their main goal is trying to get company's to increase their online defenses right?
And if all they did was hack the company, send them back their info saying "Fix your broken stuff, it's weak," I wouldn't care in the slightest, good on them. The fact that they are hurting innocent people by giving away their info is what bugs me. They gain nothing by selling your credit card info to pirates. Literally, nothing, since they aren't stealing it themselves. They are basically taking your wallet, and giving it to the next bum on the street they find. Hell, if they used the info THEMSELVES I wouldn't even mind so much.RvLeshrac said:That can be mitigated by increasing security. The vast majority of these attacks have only been successful because they exploit widely-known holes. They could've been avoided had the companies in question even bothered to do basic audits.
Well told you so seems to be appropriate of course I left out the part where I said the are probably looking at threads like these and laughing there ass of or planning an attack. Of course my former opinion is they aren't that childish. Lo and behold they are.dmase said:A lot of people are saying lulzsec isn't very funny and of course they aren't to us but yeah this thread proves they are accomplishing their goal. They are laughing their asses off at all the threats, hate, and in-fighting in threads like these. I wouldn't be surprised if they lurk forums like these just looking for lulzy responses.
I'm sure everyone appreciates having the information but the flaming of lulzsec threads probably just gets them off. If it wasn't against the rules I think everybody should just post fuck'em.
I'm only really posting this because looking through this thread I see nothing constructive or worth saying. And of course this is all just a guess, lulzsec may not even bother looking at forums to get a feel for the public's response but that seems to be their whole goal, reaction.
Famous or infamous?dmase said:Edit: also congratulations OP your thread was posted on lulzsec's twitter feed, technically your famous... or something.