Nazrel said:
gim73 said:
Let's just call nintendo Spain. A fat, gluttonous country that has been exploiting the new world ever since it 'discovered' it years before. Suddenly, pirates start attacking their ships in the new world. Oh noes!
Well, actually there are alot of comparisons you can make between nintendo and spain. Both of their policies have been known as barbaric and inhumane. Empires built on the blood of the locals. Not the smartest bunch but controlling the largest population.
Please elaborate, I may not be up to date on all the stuff Nintendo has done, but nothing come to mind that remotely justifies that analogy.
Perhaps you kids are too young to remember back in the days of the NES when nintendo had a monopoly on video games. Stuff like the nintendo 'seal of quality' whereas if you lacked it you could not sell your game next to official nintendo games (or even in the same store). We live in a world where there are M/R18 ratings for video games, but back in the day nintendo just censored everything they considered offensive and if you fell outside that you didn't get their official seal and couldn't sell your game. Hell, the damn thing didn't even ensure quality. There were alot of crap games for the NES with this and a few great games without it. Try Tengens Tetris if you want the best version.
Other reasons for a third party licensee to NOT release a nintendo game:
Licensees were not permitted to release the same game for a competing console until two years had passed.
Nintendo would decide how many cartridges would be supplied to the licensee.
Nintendo would decide how much space would be dedicated for articles, advertising, etc. in Nintendo Power.
There was a minimum number of cartridges which had to be ordered by the licensee from Nintendo.
There was a yearly limit of five games that a licensee may produce for a Nintendo console.
That's right, two years. No simultaneous releases here! Also, many of the licensees warned nintendo that cartridges were going to be prohibitively expensive for the N64 based on the level of memory required for that generation of video games, but nintedo refused to pursue cd based technology for that generation. Pretty much: nintendo treated their third party licensees like crap and it was no big suprise when most of them went over to sony in the mid ninties and really haven't been back. The only really reasonable item off this list is the third one, because nintendo power is entirely their responsibility and not the only gaming magazine out there. The rest is a bunch of pretty crappy that doesn't really fly in the modern age of video games.