Nintendo Makes Major Reductions in Wii U, 3DS Sales Projections

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,386
1,972
118
Country
USA
Dragonbums said:
Gorfias said:
The numbers don't look so bad to me.



Maybe they're just lowering expectations? Personally, I only started thinking about the Wii U after the PS4 and Xbone came out and convinced me they're not ready for purchase yet. PS4 GOTY was Assassin's Creed 4, which could also be played on PS3, while PS3 had exclussive Last of Us, GOTY in general for many.

Only the Wii U is offering a truly fresh new experience. So, I got one about a week ago. And it is all that. A fresh, new and fun experience.
Keep in mind that this chart is old and Xbox One and PS4 made those numbers in a matter of a month whereas the Wii U took a year. It's all about context. Not just looking at the graph.
They are old. I can't wait for newer numbers, say, by April. If others are having my experience, it is possible that PS4/X sales will slow and Wii U may pick up as people see PS4/X not ready for prime time.

I did hold off a year on Wii U myself, having been so badly burned (IMHO) by the Wii. Outside of being a party system, that just wasn't fun to play. The Wii U, with it's pro controller and tablet, is different.

At this rate, if it ends up only being a Dreamcast, I can live with that. I had 4 of those and tons of games.
 

Saucycarpdog

New member
Sep 30, 2009
3,258
0
0
xaszatm said:
...do you read posts properly? When did I ever say apple or samsung didn't have to advertise their products? If you actually cared to read the previous posts, you'll see that hammering=having to explain how your product is not an add on to another product, which is what Dragonbums was saying Nintendo should do. Now tell me, when in those commercials you posted did they have to explain that? Did those products suffer from any confusion?

No? Then I honestly don't know where your argument is.


144 said:
I think I'll direct your first paragraph to my response above. For the second one, I'm a dumb gamer? Then why is the PS4 selling faster in just 2 months than the Wii U its second holiday season? I'm guessing those gamers just can't "figure it out", right? As well as all the publishers who have said they don't know how to develop their games for the Wii U. They also just couldn't "figure it out". It's everyones fault but Nitendo's here, right?

Perhaps you could explain what they should just "figure out". I'm sure your explanation will save me a trip to Business 102. ;)
 

144_v1legacy

New member
Apr 25, 2008
648
0
0
Saucycarpdog said:
xaszatm said:
...do you read posts properly? When did I ever say apple or samsung didn't have to advertise their products? If you actually cared to read the previous posts, you'll see that hammering=having to explain how your product is not an add on to another product, which is what Dragonbums was saying Nintendo should do. Now tell me, when in those commercials you posted did they have to explain that? Did those products suffer from any confusion?

No? Then I honestly don't know where your argument is.


144 said:
Saucycarpdog said:
Aiddon said:
Saucycarpdog said:
If a company has to dedicate its advertising to explaining a product to the masses, you can probably see why said product isn't doing so well. Business 101.
And business 101 is also this: customers are idiots and will not get things unless you hammer it into their skulls. Seriously, you basically have to idiot proof things in order for people to understand even the SIMPLEST of things. Nintendo thought people were smarter than that. They were wrong.
Mega successes like Apple and Samsung didn't have to hammer anything into consumers. They made products that were easily accessible to consumers, ones that could serve many functions and make everyday life easier, and the consumers in turn bought them in mass.

Meanwhile, I'm still trying to figure out how having two screens adds to the gaming experience. Does that make me a dumb consumer?
Huh. Business 101? I actually didn't go to a business school, so I'm not familiar with the course. I had no idea so many posters here at the Escapist did. But I seem to remember that, as easy and accessible to consumers as they may have been, all the tech successes I can think of had a corresponding successful ad campaign, and they all explained what the product did.

Also, I don't know if the not-being-able-to-figure-out-how-having-two-screens-adds-to-the-gaming-experience makes for a dumb consumer (again, didn't attend Business 101), but I do think that it makes for a dumb gamer. Can you really not figure it out? Or are you waiting to see if it gets covered in Business 102?
I think I'll direct your first paragraph to my response above. For the second one, I'm a dumb gamer? Then why is the PS4 selling faster in just 2 months than the Wii U its second holiday season? I'm guessing those gamers just can't "figure it out", right? As well as all the publishers who have said they don't know how to develop their games for the Wii U. They also just couldn't "figure it out". It's everyones fault but Nitendo's here, right?

Perhaps you could explain what they should just "figure out". I'm sure your explanation will save me a trip to Business 102. ;)
Wow. My post was actually directed at the line of posts in general regarding how everyone claims to be such a business expert, in spite of how likely it isn't. People make these grand claims as to what will and won't fix problems with 100% certainty, and back themselves up using examples from other market scenarios that they argue are perfectly analogous, when I really doubt that they are.

So let me ask you this: are the iPod market and the WiiU market 1:1? People are talking as though they are. Which is terrifying. For that matter, are the PS4 market and the WiiU market 1:1? Not that they aren't comparable, but "Business 101" it ain't.

AND ABOUT the gamepad...
I don't think they cover it in Business 102, so I'll go over my impressions of your statement and its shocking quality here:
Really? It's a touchscreen. Touchscreen gaming. I figured it out. I looked at the gamepad and said, "oh, it's like an iPad, but it has tactile buttons as well, because purely haptic-feedback control mechanisms are generally terrible in hardcore scenarios." Sometimes, it's good to be able to use your fingers and slide and touch and stuff, but it sucks to cover up the screen that you are looking at with your own controlling yet immersion-breaking fingers. The gamepad is like a DS, but at home. And the DS was a good idea. After all, gamers figured that out, right? Of course, the whole "touch generation" ad campaign helped out a bit.
 

xaszatm

That Voice in Your Head
Sep 4, 2010
1,146
0
0
Saucycarpdog said:
xaszatm said:
...do you read posts properly? When did I ever say apple or samsung didn't have to advertise their products? If you actually cared to read the previous posts, you'll see that hammering=having to explain how your product is not an add on to another product, which is what Dragonbums was saying Nintendo should do. Now tell me, when in those commercials you posted did they have to explain that? Did those products suffer from any confusion?

No? Then I honestly don't know where your argument is.


144 said:
I think I'll direct your first paragraph to my response above. For the second one, I'm a dumb gamer? Then why is the PS4 selling faster in just 2 months than the Wii U its second holiday season? I'm guessing those gamers just can't "figure it out", right? As well as all the publishers who have said they don't know how to develop their games for the Wii U. They also just couldn't "figure it out". It's everyones fault but Nitendo's here, right?

Perhaps you could explain what they should just "figure out". I'm sure your explanation will save me a trip to Business 102. ;)
ipod ==> ipad
ipod ==> iphone
iphone ==> ipad
Mac Version X ==> Mac Version X.2 (though any computer software upgrade suffers this to be fair)

These were all versions which there was confusion over whether or not it was an upgrade. The difference was that there WERE advertisements to clear up the confusion, plus multiple stores which many people shopped that had staff on board to explain the difference. Heck, when working at Best Buy, that was one of the most common questioned asked. And no, the fact that the names were iPod, iPad, and iPhone didn't make people understand.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Gorfias said:
The numbers don't look so bad to me.
The fact that Sony sold almost as much in just over one month as Nintendo did with an extra year doesn't look so bad?

Nintendo's been taking a bath on the Wii U.I mean, sure, they've got a lot of reserves to sit on, but that doesn't mean this isn't bad.

Gorfias said:
I can't wait for newer numbers, say, by April. If others are having my experience, it is possible that PS4/X sales will slow and Wii U may pick up as people see PS4/X not ready for prime time.
They used to say "Anything can happen in the WWF." The reality was a lot more predictable.

The same is true for the reality of...well, reality. While anything technically can happen, it's far more likely that sales are going to continue in the same vein. Especially since we've had a second holiday season and a Mario title fail to significantly boost sales.

Aiddon said:
Like I've said before, if the "casuals" have really jumped ship anyway then it's not like the PS4 or XB1 are going to do any better in the long run. You don't sell 80 million systems solely on the "hardcore" as that would be like how the comics industry imploded after solely making stuff for so-called "hardcore" fans while not trying to bring in younger/newer readers.
You're right. Calling them casuals is kind of a disservice to Wii users. They were often non-gamers who saw this shiny new thing on the market. They likely never thought of it as a game machine, never thought of themselves as gamers, and went back to not buying consoles after the Wii.

This is what happens when a fad invades any product.
 

Aiddon_v1legacy

New member
Nov 19, 2009
3,672
0
0
here, let me tell you a little secret: the audience that bought the Wii was nothing new. They had ALWAYS existed in gaming. ALWAYS. You REALLY think the PS1, the PS2, the DS, or even the 360 or PS3 sold millions due to "gamers"? No, that's just not how things work, never has been. People not buying consoles again after getting one? That's a tale as old as gaming itself. Trying to act like the Wii getting that market was anything new to gaming is historical revisionism or at the very least people not studying history properly. Fact of the matter is, there have ALWAYS been people who have bought gaming machines but never thought of themselves as "gamers." And they outnumber "gamers." Those are the facts
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,386
1,972
118
Country
USA
Zachary Amaranth said:
The fact that Sony sold almost as much in just over one month as Nintendo did with an extra year doesn't look so bad?

Nintendo's been taking a bath on the Wii U.
It was thought Gen 7 would be the last. The last really relevant gen is very possible. I think they all face huge challenges. But when I look at the power of the PS4, I have to think Gen 8 will be with us even longer than the unusually long Gen 7 was. 8 Gig of DDR5 ?!?!?!

So, I'm thinking 10 years. After that, who knows? I've started putting PCs with my TVs. In the near future, an ultrabook type thing (or just a cord hanging from your tv that you plug such a device into) is likely the future.

So, over the next 10 years, gaming wise, what can we expect?

At this time, Wii U leads (yes, they had a year's head start). My question is, after PS4 and Xbone showed up, is it possible others like me said, "they're not ready yet. And this Wii U offers new and better things than Wii... though Wii BC is cool too." My kid is using the BC and I am rediscovering, sadly, that Mario can be wicked hard!

I'm excited to see April's numbers. Will Wii U sales pick up as we now have something to compare it to and find, it really is the only truly new, innovative next gen system? I think it possible. We'll see.

EDIT: Is Watchdogs coming to Wii U? Oh my. I gotta get me a Wii U pro controller. I like the tablet, but I think I want that controller for such games.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Gorfias said:
It was thought Gen 7 would be the last. The last really relevant gen is very possible. I think they all face huge challenges. But when I look at the power of the PS4, I have to think Gen 8 will be with us even longer than the unusually long Gen 7 was. 8 Gig of DDR5 ?!?!?!

So, I'm thinking 10 years. After that, who knows? I've started putting PCs with my TVs. In the near future, an ultrabook type thing (or just a cord hanging from your tv that you plug such a device into) is likely the future.

So, over the next 10 years, gaming wise, what can we expect?

At this time, Wii U leads (yes, they had a year's head start). My question is, after PS4 and Xbone showed up, is it possible others like me said, "they're not ready yet. And this Wii U offers new and better things than Wii... though Wii BC is cool too." My kid is using the BC and I am rediscovering, sadly, that Mario can be wicked hard!

I'm excited to see April's numbers. Will Wii U sales pick up as we now have something to compare it to and find, it really is the only truly new, innovative next gen system? I think it possible. We'll see.

EDIT: Is Watchdogs coming to Wii U? Oh my. I gotta get me a Wii U pro controller. I like the tablet, but I think I want that controller for such games.
I appreciate your optimism, but it's very unlikely the Xbone and Wii U are in it for that long a haul.

Again, anything is possible, but the germane, cogent question is "is it likely?" The answer to the relevant question is "no." You may be excited now, but will you be when the probable outcome occurs, and Wii U is still not doing so hot? you seem blinded by a love of faux innovation, but honestly it's going to take more than buzzwords to pack in an audience.

And yeah, consoles might be gone next gen. Just like people said a generation ago, and the generation before that....

But none of your predictions are particularly likely. It sounds more like what you want to happen, and I'm sorry, but you're very likely to be disappointed.

But you largely dodged my question, which dealt with the nature of the charts to date. Only selling about a million more units than a machine that's been out a fraction of the time (at a loss, without major software boons) isn't bad news?
 

Saucycarpdog

New member
Sep 30, 2009
3,258
0
0
144 said:
Saucycarpdog said:
Wow. My post was actually directed at the line of posts in general regarding how everyone claims to be such a business expert, in spite of how likely it isn't. People make these grand claims as to what will and won't fix problems with 100% certainty, and back themselves up using examples from other market scenarios that they argue are perfectly analogous, when I really doubt that they are.

So let me ask you this: are the iPod market and the WiiU market 1:1? People are talking as though they are. Which is terrifying. For that matter, are the PS4 market and the WiiU market 1:1? Not that they aren't comparable, but "Business 101" it ain't.

AND ABOUT the gamepad...
I don't think they cover it in Business 102, so I'll go over my impressions of your statement and its shocking quality here:
Really? It's a touchscreen. Touchscreen gaming. I figured it out. I looked at the gamepad and said, "oh, it's like an iPad, but it has tactile buttons as well, because purely haptic-feedback control mechanisms are generally terrible in hardcore scenarios." Sometimes, it's good to be able to use your fingers and slide and touch and stuff, but it sucks to cover up the screen that you are looking at with your own controlling yet immersion-breaking fingers. The gamepad is like a DS, but at home. And the DS was a good idea. After all, gamers figured that out, right? Of course, the whole "touch generation" ad campaign helped out a bit.
Are you seriously telling me that the PS4 and the Wii U aren't in the same market? The home gaming console market? I'd really like to see you elaborate on this further.

Touchscreen gaming? Just like the DS, you're right! But wait, you still aren't giving me an explanation as to why gamers haven't "figured out" the Wii U yet. All you've said is the DS is just like it and was popular, which kinda kills your argument as why should gamers buy the Wii U when they have the DS? Perhaps you could "figure out" that one out for me. Don't want to skip over anything, right? ;)
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,386
1,972
118
Country
USA
Zachary Amaranth said:
I appreciate your optimism, but it's very unlikely the Xbone and Wii U are in it for that long a haul.
I'll have to look into the Xbone more. I know I don't want one, much as I'd love to play Halo 5. But you think they're toast already?

anything is possible, but the germane, cogent question is "is it likely?" The answer to the relevant question is "no."
Waaaay to early to make that determination.

This is Nintendo. They kept producing N64s way after they realized they'd made a huge mistake not going disc. It is likely they'll keep making this thing rather than they will smother it in the cradle.

you seem blinded by a love of faux innovation, but honestly it's going to take more than buzzwords to pack in an audience
I am a lunatic. I love this stuff. I even bought a Vita in anticipation of getting a PS4. I want to be able to do that remote play for while the missus is watching something else. Then someone pointed out the vita does not have 4 shoulder buttons as the normal controller does. How well will I be able to remote play with it? I still love it though. I played Walking dead season 1 episode one while waiting for car repairs. I can't do that with the Wii tablet. But I can do remote play, likely better with it, than I can the Vita and PS4. That's not just market hype. It is a reality.

And yeah, consoles might be gone next gen. Just like people said a generation ago, and the generation before that....
New to this generation: Steam and Xbox 360 controler/receiver. I have NEVER been succesful at getting a controller pad to really work with a PC. It was a huge pain. Huge. But throwing a receiver into a PC and pairing it with 360 controller is simplicity itself. This time, it really is different than the past.

Something that does sucK: I had an android tablet that worked with a controller. Then I updated the firmware and the port stopped working. I doubt that was an accident.

But none of your predictions are particularly likely. It sounds more like what you want to happen, and I'm sorry, but you're very likely to be disappointed.
I actually think that unlikely. Again, if Nintendo could stick with the N64, I think they can stick with this. I think it likely they will.

But you largely dodged my question, which dealt with the nature of the charts to date. Only selling about a million more units than a machine that's been out a fraction of the time (at a loss, without major software boons) isn't bad news?
It is. Check this:



What do I think likely? Nintendo will slash the Wii U another $50. Peoples Wii consoles will finally start dying out (they need to stop producing them.) and parents will check out the $500 for an intrussive Xbone, $400 for the PS4, non-bc, need to pay annual fees for online play, etc. and the Wii U for $250 and it won't be a hard choice for them.

What I think likely is that Spring numbers will look decent enough and pick up. Nintendo did a lousy job selling this thing. But I bought one only after Sony and MS consoles came out, I did a real comparison and bought a Wii U. If 30 great games come out for it (which is saying a lot) and I can get it serviced if need be for another 5 years, it will have done right by me. I think it likely that the PS4 will be around for 10 years. The Wii U and Xbone? Another 5. Why so long? Look at "The Last of US". The bottleneck at this point appears to be developers. If they can do that with Gen 7 hardware, we probably haven't even scratched the surface of what is possible on the Gen 8 hardware. I don't think that used to be the case. Going from SNES to N64 was a gigantic leap in capabilities. Now we have diminishing returns. Hence, more time between generations. (360: 11/2005-11/2013. Yikes. And Halo 4, on that hardware, was also among the best looking console games I have ever seen)
 

144_v1legacy

New member
Apr 25, 2008
648
0
0
Saucycarpdog said:
144 said:
Saucycarpdog said:
Wow. My post was actually directed at the line of posts in general regarding how everyone claims to be such a business expert, in spite of how likely it isn't. People make these grand claims as to what will and won't fix problems with 100% certainty, and back themselves up using examples from other market scenarios that they argue are perfectly analogous, when I really doubt that they are.

So let me ask you this: are the iPod market and the WiiU market 1:1? People are talking as though they are. Which is terrifying. For that matter, are the PS4 market and the WiiU market 1:1? Not that they aren't comparable, but "Business 101" it ain't.

AND ABOUT the gamepad...
I don't think they cover it in Business 102, so I'll go over my impressions of your statement and its shocking quality here:
Really? It's a touchscreen. Touchscreen gaming. I figured it out. I looked at the gamepad and said, "oh, it's like an iPad, but it has tactile buttons as well, because purely haptic-feedback control mechanisms are generally terrible in hardcore scenarios." Sometimes, it's good to be able to use your fingers and slide and touch and stuff, but it sucks to cover up the screen that you are looking at with your own controlling yet immersion-breaking fingers. The gamepad is like a DS, but at home. And the DS was a good idea. After all, gamers figured that out, right? Of course, the whole "touch generation" ad campaign helped out a bit.
Are you seriously telling me that the PS4 and the Wii U aren't in the same market? The home gaming console market? I'd really like to see you elaborate on this further.

Touchscreen gaming? Just like the DS, you're right! But wait, you still aren't giving me an explanation as to why gamers haven't "figured out" the Wii U yet. All you've said is the DS is just like it and was popular, which kinda kills your argument as why should gamers buy the Wii U when they have the DS? Perhaps you could "figure out" that one out for me. Don't want to skip over anything, right? ;)
To paraphrase, I said that the markets for the various electronics companies aren't perfectly analogous. Your reaction was "are you seriously telling me that the PS4 and the Wii U aren't in the same market?" It's strange, because considering your professed fluency in Business 101, it seems you still don't realize the substantial difference between having different target markets and being in the same market.
But are you really confused? Or are you intentionally misunderstanding semantics to get angry? I have no way of knowing, but I hope for the sake of the Escapist that you didn't read the whole post, and are smart enough to actually know what I meant without needing the following example.
The SUPERMARKET EXAMPLE:
Because I hypothetically went to a supermarket the other day. There was so much food. There was a section for cheeses, a section for vegetables, and meats, and drinks, and even within sections there were duplicates of the same product but with different brand names. I went to get some milk. I didn't buy any kale, nor would I have been expected to, as I (as a consumer) am not in the kale market. I hate kale. But obviously, kale was in the same supermarket as milk. The Food Market. I also didn't buy cheese. I wasn't in the market for cheese. I don't mind cheese. I like cheese. But I didn't need any, so I didn't get any. And now we arrive at the milk section. Milk shares an aisle with cheese, you see. They are both part of the dairy market. Wow, look at all this milk. There's whole milk, 2%, 1%, skim, and lots of different brands of each. And I'm only going to get one. I'm in the market for milk, certainly, so all of these products are advertising to me. But I'm really thin, so I'm not in the skim milk market, or even the 1% milk market. Does that mean that whole milk and skim milk don't share a market now? No. It means that they have different target markets. I think. Again, consult your Wharton professor for this. But there are multiple whole milk and 2% milk brands to choose from. I pick the most appealing to me, and that's that. But as I'm leaving I buy some bacon because bacon is delicious. Jeez, this analogy is getting messy, huh? I guess the market is kind of confusing that way.

I'd liken comparing the markets of the iPod and WiiU to the markets of kale and milk.
I'd liken comparing the markets of the PS4 and WiiU to the markets of whole and skim milk.
Now let's look at some post context. You keep removing past posts when you quote (which is ironic when you say not to skip over things), so let's realize that the market comment I'd made was referencing the comparisons between the situations of Apple and Nintendo. When saying "for that matter, are the PS4 market...etc.", I was using that a means of pointing out that since the Sony and Nintendo markets are already different, comparing Nintendo to Apple seems like a stretch. I didn't expect your response to be "no, the Nintendo gamer and the Sony gamer is exactly the same," because considering how much console-warring happens on a site like this, the idea that someone would be so quick to say hat there is no viable reason for there to be any distinction between the markets of the consoles is staggering.


And before you tell me not to skip over shit, how about we refer to those past posts that you've removed (for space reasons, I'm sure...) where you say that YOU can't figure out the gamepad. I'm okay with having killed the argument you say I killed, since I wasn't making that argument in the first place. You seem to think that I'm trying to say that people should buy the WiiU, when so far I've said no such thing, and if you don't think it's worth it, don't. I'm also surprised that you think that "figuring out" is all it takes for a consumer to buy a product. I recently saw an ad for a laptop. It explains all these features it has that set it apart from other laptops. I see how those features may come in handy. Why haven't I bought it? Is it because it seems too expensive? Maybe. Is it because I don't feel any urgency? Perhaps. Is it because I want to see how other companies compare? Could be. Is it because I already have a laptop? Mostly.
Again, I could be totally contradicting Business 101. Maybe your professor said "okay, class. Today's lesson: everyone who doesn't immediately buy a product is either too dumb to figure it out, or the product has absolutely no worth and no amount of advertising, or other type of problem-solving can fix it. Also, if anything does or doesn't happen for any reason in the business world, it has to do with the ability inability of a consumer to figure stuff out."
But I doubt that.
 

Saucycarpdog

New member
Sep 30, 2009
3,258
0
0
144 said:
For someone who doesn't want to skip over things, you sure are doing a lot of it. Market does NOT equal target market. The market of a product is an audience that would be attracted to that product, in this case gamers who buy gaming consoles. A TARGET MARKET is something dictated by a single company on who they want to target, in this case whoever you who think Nintendo is targeting. You make a great explanation of a target market with your Milk analogy, but you were only fixing your mistake in your previous post, which you never said anything about a target market. Just Market. Only in this post do you actually fix this wording, so don't act like it's my fault for interpreting it so. I

And while I agree with your line about the console warring on this site, I do know of the distinctions between a PS4 player and a Wii U player, contradictory to your claim.

And I don't know why you're suggesting I'm doing this to get angry. "And before you tell me not to skip over shit," really tells me you're the one getting angry. How about we take both take a minute and chill before this blows up?
 

144_v1legacy

New member
Apr 25, 2008
648
0
0
Saucycarpdog said:
For someone who doesn't want to skip over things, you sure are doing a lot of it.
Said the guy who said snip, and also the guy who said, verbatim, "don't want to skip over anything, right?"

Saucycarpdog said:
Market does NOT equal target market. The market of a product is an audience that would be attracted to that product, in this case gamers who buy gaming consoles. A TARGET MARKET is something dictated by a single company on who they want to target, in this case whoever you who think Nintendo is targeting.
In another of your comments, you said to someone else in passive aggression "do you read posts properly?" It's clear you don't read mine. And I don't think you read your own. You're telling me that market and target market aren't equal. It's funny, because if you read the post you just responded to, you'd realize that I'm the one who was saying that to you. Here is a real, actual thing I said:
"it seems you still don't realize the substantial difference between having different target markets and being in the same market."
Read it again. What that sentence is is me telling you then what you think you are telling me now. When I said that the markets of the different consoles were different, you were the one who said they weren't.


Saucycarpdog said:
You make a great explanation of a target market with your Milk analogy
I know. Thank you.

Saucycarpdog said:
And while I agree with your line about the console warring on this site, I do know of the distinctions between a PS4 player and a Wii U player, contradictory to your claim.
Then prove it.
But so far, thank you for telling me that I'm right. Go back and reread all the posts you've omitted, and maybe you'll realize what you've done.
And I think that business doesn't hold a future for you. Perhaps in future posts, in may not be in your best interest to reference your notes from business 101. But maybe politics does, considering your almost superhuman ability to change sides and forget past statements.
 

Saucycarpdog

New member
Sep 30, 2009
3,258
0
0
144 said:
Said the guy who said snip, and also the guy who said, verbatim, "don't want to skip over anything, right?"
Thank you for noticing what I said, as you have been skipping over a lot of things. Like below

144 said:
In another of your comments, you said to someone else in passive aggression "do you read posts properly?" It's clear you don't read mine. And I don't think you read your own. You're telling me that market and target market aren't equal. It's funny, because if you read the post you just responded to, you'd realize that I'm the one who was saying that to you. Here is a real, actual thing I said:
"it seems you still don't realize the substantial difference between having different target markets and being in the same market."
Read it again. What that sentence is is me telling you then what you think you are telling me now. When I said that the markets of the different consoles were different, you were the one who said they weren't.
Love how you skip the part where I say you are only now correcting your mistake. So thank you for now admitting that. If you actually read your post over, you'll see you were only now just fixing that part and telling me " Well I was talking about target markets, so you're wrong". I was the one that had to explain why they are different and why your previous post is therefore wrong and why your post caused the confusion. I'm not wrong, you just worded your post so that you're wrong and I was pointing that out. I was only explaining where the distinction is and why you can't use market in place of target market. So I guess we both agree you made a mistake.


144 said:
I know. Thank you.
You're welcome. ;)


144 said:
Then prove it.
But so far, thank you for telling me that I'm right. Go back and reread all the posts you've omitted, and maybe you'll realize what you've done.
And I think that business doesn't hold a future for you. Perhaps in future posts, in may not be in your best interest to reference your notes from business 101. But maybe politics does, considering your almost superhuman ability to change sides and forget past statements.
What do you want me to prove? We both agree PS4 players and Wii U players are different. And you weren't right, like I say above, you just used the wrong word and then try to argue with me after you made the distinction. I was arguing market, you quickly changed to target market. My advice, don't use bait and switch for arguments. You only end up looking like the fool. Like you say, "Don't switch sides and forget past statements."

And what's with this aggression? You say I'm doing this to get angry but you're the only one getting angry here. Like I said before, take minute and chill. I'm not one for arguing if you're just going to start throwing crap like this like a little child.
 

Asuka Soryu

New member
Jun 11, 2010
2,437
0
0
Nintendo should go Third party... After buying Sony, then troll everyone by being tablet exclusive with all of Nintendo and Sony's exclusives. xD Oh, and despite the suckage of the Wii U, they're still better off then Sony's entire company, let alone its gaming division.
 

Asuka Soryu

New member
Jun 11, 2010
2,437
0
0
This reminded me, I saw an add selling Mario 3D World. The person got it as a Christmas gift and was saddened to find out their Wii was incapable of playing Wii U game.

x3 I don't think the thought that people still don't know what the Wii U actually is, is that absurd.

Also, I had gotten a 3DS game awhile back, the employee stopped me and told me that the game would only work on 3DS and not DS.


This had become such a problem, they had to tell people this when they bought these games...
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,386
1,972
118
Country
USA
Asuka Soryu said:
This reminded me, I saw an add selling Mario 3D World. The person got it as a Christmas gift and was saddened to find out their Wii was incapable of playing Wii U game.

x3 I don't think the thought that people still don't know what the Wii U actually is, is that absurd.

Also, I had gotten a 3DS game awhile back, the employee stopped me and told me that the game would only work on 3DS and not DS.


This had become such a problem, they had to tell people this when they bought these games...
As someone rooting for the Wii U, that is heartening. People have to tell buyers that 3ds games will only work on a 3ds, not a DS? Even so, the 3DS is selling very well.



I've written before: I only got interested in the Wii U once the other consoles came out and do an actual comparison. The Wii U is so much hardware for so little money while the other two consoles are a substantial investment that don't have the games yet. Until they do, they are not BC, so, now what. Use the Xbone as a voice activated TV remote! For $500! At $300, the Wii U has some games and is BC.

I think they need to stop producing Wiis as MS stopped making the Xbox so we HAD to get a 360. People whose Wii finally dies will buy a Wii U.
 

Hiroshi Mishima

New member
Sep 25, 2008
407
0
0
Asuka Soryu said:
Also, I had gotten a 3DS game awhile back, the employee stopped me and told me that the game would only work on 3DS and not DS.
Last year I was selling some old DS games I never played (and wouldn't miss) along with Sticker Star (which I loathed). A family came by during the garage sale and their kids were looking at the games. I actually did have to tell them the one wasn't for the DS, but the 3DS. Neither the child nor the parents had been able to make the distinction.

People who like to play games are making this mistake, so it's clearly an issue even among the "non-casuals".

More to the point, however, people here have mentioned advertising and this is very important. Last generation, the "Wii Would Like to Play" commercials were very well known and shown frequently. I haven't seen ANY Wii U or 3DS commercials. Hell, for more product confusion, the 3DS and DS look very similar, especially when closed.