Nintendo Switch....DOA

Recommended Videos

EternallyBored

Terminally Apathetic
Jun 17, 2013
1,434
0
0
So, from watching the announcements and followups, articles, and interviews, I don't know exactly what to think, mixed feelings would be the best way to describe it.

A kind of lackluster launch lineup, that's normal for consoles, but the tiny number is a bit concerning.

Battery life is kind of as good as you would expect for a console like that, not really great for a truly mobile use though, gonna have to bring battery backups if you want to bring the thing on a long plane flight

The storage capacity sounds like an inconvenience at best, or a disaster at worst. I am already running into issues with filling up my 1 Tb harddrive on my PS4 and Xbox, the Switch having a 32 gig storage capacity isn't even enough to store some single games today, I guess we can upgrade with micro SD cards, but that still puts you at around 200-250 gigs max storage, and that's going to run you an extra 100-200 dollars on top of what you are paying for the console. There's 500 gig micro SD cards coming out in June or July, but the companies are stating those are launching at around $1000, so yeah, fuck that, I'm not paying $1000 for half the storage capacity of my current consoles. Micro SD cards are also inferior to regular harddrives for load speeds, and tend to break down sooner in my experience, they develop write errors a lot faster than a mechanical harddrive or scaled up SSD. So it seems to heavily encourage buying physical copies of everything rather than utilizing a digital library, unless they launch one hell of a cloud system with their online service.

The paid online is a pain in the ass, I already pass Xbox gold and just stick with PS+ for my online console needs, their service sounds questionable at best, only getting bonus games for one month rather than getting them for free like PS+, even then it sounds like old NES and SNES games I've likely already played. There's also the report that their voice chat is a friggin phone app, so not even native to the console itself. I would imagine it synchs with the console through bluetooth or something so you can get the game audio too, if not then its officially worthless and makes me want to pay for online services through them even less.

Lastly, before this gets too long, the price of accessories, the lan stuff is cool with multiple consoles, but the controllers are friggen expensive, the pro controller costing more than the regular controllers for the other consoles. an extra docking station is $90.

Overall, I really don't see this being the next Wii, sales and popularity wise, maybe not DOA, but I will honestly be surprised if the console beats the sales of the WiiU by any significant margin.
 

EscapeGoat_v1legacy

New member
Aug 20, 2008
2,786
0
0
I have to admit I'm not exactly wildly excited about the Switch.

I'm not surprised by the lower specs but that's fine - I'm pretty sure Nintendo are aware that they won't be attracting the biggest AAA titles or developers and so we'll see a bigger focus on first-party development with some third-party stuff, much like the Wii and Wii U. In the end the specs probably won't be an issue for the first-party games and while some third-party games might run poorly on the Switch, I suspect most consumers will primarily be buying the Switch for the Nintendo staples, again just like with the Wii and Wii U.

I do wish its USP wasn't there to blur the distinction between handheld and home consoles - for one, it might well create a marketing/identity issue for the Switch with consumers and developers unsure of what it's best suited for and for two, most of my up-to-date gaming is done on handhelds and I rather like the fact that the 3DS and its games are affordable but if focus is changing over to the Switch as a hybrid handheld/home console I worry that the 3DS will be phased out sooner rather than later.

The base price for the Switch is pretty good but the peripherals are clearly where Nintendo and whoever is manufacturing them are hoping to see some major profit. The little Switch controllers are interesting from the standpoint of Nintendo's multiplayer ambitions but I reckon they look a bit uncomfortable to use sideways; the Pro controller is more what I prefer but they are looking kind of pricey.

Oh yeah, the paid online thing - so paid online looks to be a staple for consoles, which is a shame. Heard it's pretty cheap which would be a benefit (sort of) except Nintendo's online stuff is easily the worst out there. None of its online stores have been designed well or run well and we'll have to wait and see how well they can handle online gaming with consumers getting angry if their paid services aren't running well. Also, the free NES/SNES game thing is utter bollocks - that they're pushing one game (which is essentially just a ROM) a month is pathetic and that it's a rental is a real slap in the face.

And then there's the games. Breath of the Wild looks pretty cool, not gonna lie. I'm always up for a new Zelda game and this one looks pretty cool. Super Mario Odyssey looks naff - not sure who decided Mario should run around in the real world but it looks awful. Most of the other stuff is either rereleases or standard Nintendo stuff, though I am interested in the new Shin Megami Tensei game. The Ultra Street Fighter II reveal made me unreasonably annoyed though; as if that game hasn't been rereleased enough times since 1991.
 

Yoshi178

New member
Aug 15, 2014
2,108
0
0
Skatalite said:
I don't know about DoA (it'll definitely sell more than the Wii U at least), but nothing they've shown interests me. Doubt I'll ever be buying anything Nintendo again.

Yoshi178 said:
Fox12 said:
The Last Guardian
LOL reviews have been saying that is actually meant to be so freaking bad
It's got an 82 on Metacritic, which is higher than your favorites The Wonderful 101 and Splatoon.
least they don't control like garbage like Last Guardian does
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
20,022
4,734
118
Yoshi178 said:
Skatalite said:
I don't know about DoA (it'll definitely sell more than the Wii U at least), but nothing they've shown interests me. Doubt I'll ever be buying anything Nintendo again.

Yoshi178 said:
Fox12 said:
The Last Guardian
LOL reviews have been saying that is actually meant to be so freaking bad
It's got an 82 on Metacritic, which is higher than your favorites The Wonderful 101 and Splatoon.
least they don't control like garbage like Last Guardian does
"It's got terrible reviews!"
"82 on Metacritic"
"Well the controls suck!"

You know what they say about haters, and what they're gonna do, right?
 

Skatalite

New member
May 8, 2007
197
0
0
Yoshi178 said:
least they don't control like garbage like Last Guardian does
You haven't even played The Last Guardian though. Its controls are physics-based, the same as in Shadow of the Colossus (another game you probably haven't played). It's not supposed to be a tight platformer, which I guess is what some critics were expecting.
 

Yoshi178

New member
Aug 15, 2014
2,108
0
0
Johnny Novgorod said:
Yoshi178 said:
Skatalite said:
I don't know about DoA (it'll definitely sell more than the Wii U at least), but nothing they've shown interests me. Doubt I'll ever be buying anything Nintendo again.

Yoshi178 said:
Fox12 said:
The Last Guardian
LOL reviews have been saying that is actually meant to be so freaking bad
It's got an 82 on Metacritic, which is higher than your favorites The Wonderful 101 and Splatoon.
least they don't control like garbage like Last Guardian does
"It's got terrible reviews!"
"82 on Metacritic"
"Well the controls suck!"

You know what they say about haters, and what they're gonna do, right?
Call of Duty has better metacritic scores than the Last Guardian.

i guess those games are soooooooo much better than last guardian.
 

EternallyBored

Terminally Apathetic
Jun 17, 2013
1,434
0
0
Yoshi178 said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
Yoshi178 said:
Skatalite said:
I don't know about DoA (it'll definitely sell more than the Wii U at least), but nothing they've shown interests me. Doubt I'll ever be buying anything Nintendo again.

Yoshi178 said:
Fox12 said:
The Last Guardian
LOL reviews have been saying that is actually meant to be so freaking bad
It's got an 82 on Metacritic, which is higher than your favorites The Wonderful 101 and Splatoon.
least they don't control like garbage like Last Guardian does
"It's got terrible reviews!"
"82 on Metacritic"
"Well the controls suck!"

You know what they say about haters, and what they're gonna do, right?
Call of Duty has better metacritic scores than the Last Guardian.

i guess those games are soooooooo much better than last guardian.

Which call of duty? because the original absolutely I would consider a better game, it changed the FPS genre. MW1 also changed multiplayer shooters for its entire generation and beyond, couple with a good single player campaign, so I would also call that a better game than the last guardian. Looking at metacritic, most of the rest are hovering within a couple points of the Last Guardian, and the more modern lazy entries are sitting below or at the same score.
 

Dirty Hipsters

This is how we praise the sun!
Legacy
Feb 7, 2011
9,030
3,712
118
Country
'Merica
Gender
3 children in a trench coat
Yoshi178 said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
Yoshi178 said:
Skatalite said:
I don't know about DoA (it'll definitely sell more than the Wii U at least), but nothing they've shown interests me. Doubt I'll ever be buying anything Nintendo again.

Yoshi178 said:
Fox12 said:
The Last Guardian
LOL reviews have been saying that is actually meant to be so freaking bad
It's got an 82 on Metacritic, which is higher than your favorites The Wonderful 101 and Splatoon.
least they don't control like garbage like Last Guardian does
"It's got terrible reviews!"
"82 on Metacritic"
"Well the controls suck!"

You know what they say about haters, and what they're gonna do, right?
Call of Duty has better metacritic scores than the Last Guardian.

i guess those games are soooooooo much better than last guardian.
YOU'RE the one who brought up review scores in the first place. So good job winning an argument against yourself I guess.
 

Yoshi178

New member
Aug 15, 2014
2,108
0
0
EternallyBored said:
Yoshi178 said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
Yoshi178 said:
Skatalite said:
I don't know about DoA (it'll definitely sell more than the Wii U at least), but nothing they've shown interests me. Doubt I'll ever be buying anything Nintendo again.

Yoshi178 said:
Fox12 said:
The Last Guardian
LOL reviews have been saying that is actually meant to be so freaking bad
It's got an 82 on Metacritic, which is higher than your favorites The Wonderful 101 and Splatoon.
least they don't control like garbage like Last Guardian does
"It's got terrible reviews!"
"82 on Metacritic"
"Well the controls suck!"

You know what they say about haters, and what they're gonna do, right?
Call of Duty has better metacritic scores than the Last Guardian.

i guess those games are soooooooo much better than last guardian.
Which call of duty? because the original absolutely I would consider a better game, it changed the FPS genre. MW1 also changed multiplayer shooters for its entire generation and beyond, couple with a good single player campaign, so I would also call that a better game than the last guardian. Looking at metacritic, most of the rest are hovering within a couple points of the Last Guardian, and the more modern lazy entries are sitting below or at the same score.
Advance Warfare, Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2 and Modern Warfare 3 all have better scores so does Black ops II
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
20,022
4,734
118
Yoshi178 said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
Yoshi178 said:
Skatalite said:
I don't know about DoA (it'll definitely sell more than the Wii U at least), but nothing they've shown interests me. Doubt I'll ever be buying anything Nintendo again.

Yoshi178 said:
Fox12 said:
The Last Guardian
LOL reviews have been saying that is actually meant to be so freaking bad
It's got an 82 on Metacritic, which is higher than your favorites The Wonderful 101 and Splatoon.
least they don't control like garbage like Last Guardian does
"It's got terrible reviews!"
"82 on Metacritic"
"Well the controls suck!"

You know what they say about haters, and what they're gonna do, right?
Call of Duty has better metacritic scores than the Last Guardian.

i guess those games are soooooooo much better than last guardian.
"LOL, reviews have been saying it's bad"

Two posts later.

"LOL, reviews mean nothing because COD gets good ones"

 

Yoshi178

New member
Aug 15, 2014
2,108
0
0
Johnny Novgorod said:
Yoshi178 said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
Yoshi178 said:
Skatalite said:
I don't know about DoA (it'll definitely sell more than the Wii U at least), but nothing they've shown interests me. Doubt I'll ever be buying anything Nintendo again.

Yoshi178 said:
Fox12 said:
The Last Guardian
LOL reviews have been saying that is actually meant to be so freaking bad
It's got an 82 on Metacritic, which is higher than your favorites The Wonderful 101 and Splatoon.
least they don't control like garbage like Last Guardian does
"It's got terrible reviews!"
"82 on Metacritic"
"Well the controls suck!"

You know what they say about haters, and what they're gonna do, right?
Call of Duty has better metacritic scores than the Last Guardian.

i guess those games are soooooooo much better than last guardian.
"LOL, reviews have been saying it's bad"

Two posts later.

"LOL, reviews mean nothing because COD gets good ones"

hey you guys were the ones saying metacritic scores are the reason last guardian is better than games like Wonderful 101

i'm just saying if you're going to think like that you must also think that Call of Duty is one of the best game series of all time and that those games are soooooooooo much better than Last Guardian.

your logic. not mine.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
20,022
4,734
118
Yoshi178 said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
Yoshi178 said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
Yoshi178 said:
Skatalite said:
I don't know about DoA (it'll definitely sell more than the Wii U at least), but nothing they've shown interests me. Doubt I'll ever be buying anything Nintendo again.

Yoshi178 said:
Fox12 said:
The Last Guardian
LOL reviews have been saying that is actually meant to be so freaking bad
It's got an 82 on Metacritic, which is higher than your favorites The Wonderful 101 and Splatoon.
least they don't control like garbage like Last Guardian does
"It's got terrible reviews!"
"82 on Metacritic"
"Well the controls suck!"

You know what they say about haters, and what they're gonna do, right?
Call of Duty has better metacritic scores than the Last Guardian.

i guess those games are soooooooo much better than last guardian.
"LOL, reviews have been saying it's bad"

Two posts later.

"LOL, reviews mean nothing because COD gets good ones"

hey you guys were the ones saying metacritic scores are the reason last guardian is better than games like Wonderful 101

i'm just saying if you're going to think like that you must also think that Call of Duty is one of the best game series of all time and that those games are soooooooooo much better than Last Guardian.

your logic. not mine.
You said a game was inequivocally bad because of negative reviews.
When it was proven the majority of its reviews were positive, you said reviews meant nothing.
Which contradicts your first statement.

Do you see the contradiction?

YOU: The Last Guardian is bad because it has bad reviews.
NOT YOU: It has mostly good reviews.
(proof)
YOU: It's bad because COD is bad and that has good reviews.

"Logically" this translates as:

YOU: A is bad because it has B.
NOT YOU: It doesn't have B.
YOU: A is bad because it doesn't have B.

Do you see it yet?




All I have to do is quote you. Look, I'll even screencap it. I can't make this any more easy for you. A puppet show maybe.
 

Yoshi178

New member
Aug 15, 2014
2,108
0
0
positive reviews that have also been saying the game controls horribly. for example:


maybe you should actually listen to the actual words reviews say and not focus solely on the review scores
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,580
7,223
118
Country
United States
WeepingAngels said:
altnameJag said:
Maximum Bert said:
altnameJag said:
Seriously, Nintendo's never played the power game, and if I recall correctly, none of their consoles or handhelds ever beat out their competitors in that realm.
The SNES and N64 did also the gamecube was more powerful than the PS2 and the NES was a step up as well from what was available at the time. The handhelds they have had very little competition. Basically they were interested in keeping up with their competitors (or even esclipsing them) in the power race until the Wii.
It's cheating to play the power game by releasing a console a couple years after your competitor, which is what happened with the SNES.
No it isn't. It's ok not to release your console at the same time as your competition, there is an advantage to releasing first too. It's a fact that until the Wii, Nintendo didn't release the weakest console of the generation.

I want to hit post but I find what I bolded so laughable that I now have to ask what your acceptable time frame is for a console to be released and not be cheating.

Edit: So, using your logic, the PS4 and Xbox One cheated by releasing a year after the Wii U.
Missed the part where the TurboGrafx-16 was the start of the 16 bit generation for Nintendo, not the SNES. It'd be like claiming victory for the Xbox One S over the baseline PS4 instead of comparing the One S to the PS4 Pro. It's not a good comparison. Did Nintendo come out with a more powerful console later? Well, yeah, when the cost of technology made it feasible. Until the WiiU, every console Nintendo made was priced to make a profit, unlike Sony and Microsoft who're happy to sell consoles at a loss and make up the rest with licensing and games.

And yeah, the PS4 and the Xbox One releasing after the WiiU gave them a tech advantage, one Nintendo was willing to give up. Could they have released the GameCube or the N64 earlier? Yeah, if they were interested in direct power competition. They didn't because of cost. They don't play the power game.
 

irish286

New member
Mar 17, 2012
114
0
0
To all the people claiming the switch is too under powered, just stop. It can run play a slightly downscaled Skyrim Special Edition. Screen shot comparisons prove this. Additional foliage and the enhanced shadow textures added in the special edition were present in the screen shots. Granted they appear downscaled but it's still far and above the capabilities of the old consoles. While the switch is obviously weaker, how many of you would honestly scoff at being able to play games with better graphics than a ps3 but not quite as good as a ps4 on the go?
 

votemarvel

Elite Member
Legacy
Nov 29, 2009
1,353
3
43
Country
England
Samtemdo8 said:
Valve makes so much money with Steam that they don't need an Online Subscription.
Microsoft also take a 30% cut of everything sold on Xbox (360, One, and Windows Store). Sony take a similar cut.

Do you remember when Microsoft were charging for Games for Windows Live players to game online, they swiftly dropped that fee because they knew they were killing their brand (not that dropping it helped, the damage was done by that point).

Microsoft, Sony etc charge on their consoles because they can, because they know they can get away with it.
 

Samtemdo8_v1legacy

New member
Aug 2, 2015
7,915
0
0
votemarvel said:
Samtemdo8 said:
Valve makes so much money with Steam that they don't need an Online Subscription.
Microsoft also take a 30% cut of everything sold on Xbox (360, One, and Windows Store). Sony take a similar cut.

Do you remember when Microsoft were charging for Games for Windows Live players to game online, they swiftly dropped that fee because they knew they were killing their brand (not that dropping it helped, the damage was done by that point).

Microsoft, Sony etc charge on their consoles because they can, because they know they can get away with it.
Really? Well from the reaction I see from people about this I doubt it.
 

WeepingAngels

New member
May 18, 2013
1,722
0
0
irish286 said:
To all the people claiming the switch is too under powered, just stop. It can run play a slightly downscaled Skyrim Special Edition. Screen shot comparisons prove this. Additional foliage and the enhanced shadow textures added in the special edition were present in the screen shots. Granted they appear downscaled but it's still far and above the capabilities of the old consoles. While the switch is obviously weaker, how many of you would honestly scoff at being able to play games with better graphics than a ps3 but not quite as good as a ps4 on the go?
So it's a glass half full scenario for you because you see it as a powerful handheld instead of a weak console. Reggie though, said that it's more console than handheld and the 3DS will live right alongside the switch (see below). The complaints about it's power are related to it's high price compared to its more powerful competition. Now let's be clear, its competition is not the 360/PS3, that was the Wii. It's competition is not the Xbox One and the PS4, that was the Wii U. No, it's competition is the Xbox One S and PS4 Pro.

http://www.itechpost.com/articles/74441/20170114/nintendo-switch-vs-playstation-4-pro-xbox-one-s-now.htm

Reggie Fils Aimee: said:
I think there's a sense that Nintendo Switch is a portable device. It is portable. But at its heart, it's a home console that you can take with you on the go.
http://nintendoeverything.com/reggie-talks-switch-online-service-info-teased-on-rebuying-classic-games-supply-concerns-3ds-here-to-stay/
 

WeepingAngels

New member
May 18, 2013
1,722
0
0
altnameJag said:
WeepingAngels said:
altnameJag said:
Maximum Bert said:
altnameJag said:
Seriously, Nintendo's never played the power game, and if I recall correctly, none of their consoles or handhelds ever beat out their competitors in that realm.
The SNES and N64 did also the gamecube was more powerful than the PS2 and the NES was a step up as well from what was available at the time. The handhelds they have had very little competition. Basically they were interested in keeping up with their competitors (or even esclipsing them) in the power race until the Wii.
It's cheating to play the power game by releasing a console a couple years after your competitor, which is what happened with the SNES.
No it isn't. It's ok not to release your console at the same time as your competition, there is an advantage to releasing first too. It's a fact that until the Wii, Nintendo didn't release the weakest console of the generation.

I want to hit post but I find what I bolded so laughable that I now have to ask what your acceptable time frame is for a console to be released and not be cheating.

Edit: So, using your logic, the PS4 and Xbox One cheated by releasing a year after the Wii U.
Missed the part where the TurboGrafx-16 was the start of the 16 bit generation for Nintendo, not the SNES.
...or maybe the TG16 cheated (your word, not mine) by coming years after the NES? You can't define generation borders by CPU bits or the PS1 and N64 would be in different generations.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,973
5,852
118
WeepingAngels said:
So it's a glass half full scenario for you because you see it as a powerful handheld instead of a weak console. Reggie though, said that it's more console than handheld and the 3DS will live right alongside the switch.
See, this is how it could've gotten me excited; By being a console that merged both Nintendo's home console and handheld games. If the Switch had the ability to play 3DS games on your TV I'd be very tempted to buy one on release, as I haven't owned a handheld since the original Gameboy. But as it stands the Switch just feels like a repeat of the Wii-U.

I mean honestly, what makes the Switch different from the Wii-U, apart from a handful of gizmos and the ability to play it for three hours in handheld mode? It's going to be just as severely underpowered compared to the competition, and it's going to have the same lack of third-party support.