Is Nintendo gonna pay for me to upgrade? Because I'm fuckin' broke. So if not, they're just gonna have to wait until I'm at a point where it seems like a semi-wise investment. Also until I can afford one.
What alternate dimension were you in? People went crazy when it was revealed that the "Revolution" would actually be called the "Wii". I remember there being online campaigns to try and make Nintendo change the name back. It was all very stupid and I'm glad Nintendo paid it no attention.Andy Chalk said:"Wii" is a silly name for a console, but nobody seemed to mind
Are you saying people bought it because they liked the name? Somehow I doubt it was a very big factor.Andy Chalk said:- certainly not the bazillions of people who lined up to buy the thing.
Why? Isn't sticking an extra letter onto the name of something is pretty standard practice? PSP, DSi, SNES, Microsoft just added a meaningless number to the name of their console. The WiiU may be uninspired, but what makes it "flat-out-aweful"?Andy Chalk said:"Wii U," on the other hand, tips into the realm of flat-out awfulness,
Why did you call this article "Nintendo Urges Wii Owners to Please Please Upgrade" when the message is literally saying that the WiiU is not an upgrade. Also, you make it sound as if Nintendo is on their knees pleading with consumers when it really comes across as fairly standard marketing BS only made special through the delivery method. "Come try our exciting new product blah blah blah." The desperation must be buried somewhere deep between the lines.Andy Chalk said:Entitled "It's time to discover Wii U," it reads, "Wii U is the all-new home console from Nintendo. It's not just an upgrade - it's an entirely new system that will change the way you and your family experience games and entertainment."
Try to keep things in perspective, all the other consoles have been out for over six years. It may not be fresh out of the gate, but it's definitely still the new console on the block.Andy Chalk said:There's nothing inherently wrong with console manufacturers pimping their new hardware but the Wii U has been out for six months, which as far as catching fire with consumers goes is very definitely pushing the envelope of "new."
And what exactly is Nintendo losing? They're still turning a profit last time I checked. They obviously would like to turn a bigger profit, but Nintendo isn't straddling the brink like some other developers I can think of.Andy Chalk said:More worryingly for Nintendo in the big picture is the old political adage, "If you're explaining, you're losing." I think that applies rather aptly here, too.
They will, much to the chagrin of those people still sulking over the Wii's motion controls and Nintendo's choice of trying to expand their audience. This also happened with the 3DS. People bashed it left and right but when the heavy hitters arrived that fall then suddenly people shut their mouths. Nintendo will be fine.OlasDAlmighty said:It's the PS3 all over again.
Previous console was a ginormous success.
New console comes out with a name that makes it sound like an upgrade.
Not many new games.
Sluggish sales.
Actually ends up competing with it's own predecessor.
I hope Nintendo gets their act together soon is all I can say.
$49? I got my Wii for $8 at EB games, and it works a treat. I then grabbed a motion plus controller. It's the older model that can play gamecube games, which is why I got it. That's right, I got a Wii to play a few cheap gamecube games lol. It's collecting dust mostly....doggie015 said:Did you already forget about Lego City: Undercover? Or that enhanced edition of DX:HR that should also be going to the PC and other consoles (Minus second screen features).ellers07 said:The article yesterday explained why there were so few launch games. Why would I buy a system that has yet to release some promising games? ...
Anyway; this reeks of desperation. I am seriously considering picking up a pre-owned Nintendo Wii (They are about $49 over in Australia now! Another $13 will get you Wii Sports. Several other preowned games are just $18) just because of that message
Console Gaming won't die until decent gaming computers start being sold for $350 or less.Faith Meade said:Console gaming is dying. So happy I have a gaming-quality laptop.
Most people spend about $300 on their gaming console and about $400 on their laptop. I spent $550 on a gaming-quality laptop PC and saved $250 (as well as another spot under my TV). It also has HDMI out so I can play it on TV if I'm really missing that. As for playing on the couch, I do that all the time and WITHOUT tying up the TV. ^_^itsmeyouidiot said:Console Gaming won't die until decent gaming computers start being sold for $350 or less.
My only computer that I own is a $400 laptop, and the most graphically intensive game on it that I can play is TF2, which was released in 2007 and was by no means technically impressive even when it first came out.
I'd rather spend $350 on a new console that can play new games than $500 dollars on a desktop computer, especially since a new computer can't do anything non-gaming related that my laptop can't.
Also, you can't play PC games on a couch in front of a TV. Major disadvantage there.
No. Make new fucking games that we can't already get on our old systems, and get 3rd party developers involved, then we might buy it.kailus13 said:Make a new Zelda, and make a new 3D Mario. That's what people really want. At current, the only game I might want is Lego City.
But Nintendo is never, EVER allowed to look like they're in control or doing better than "gamers'" preconceived notions of them. You see, Nintendo CAN'T be doing well because they just can't...even when financials and profits say otherwise. Never said this line of thinking was logical.BiH-Kira said:Isn't the title a bit misleading? Nintendo sent 1 fucking message on the Wii to inform people that the WiiU is out and that it's a new, better system.
That's neither begging nor spamming as many people (including the author) in this thread imply. It's called advertising. And it's a good move.