Brilliant idea for a Skyrim shout mod \o/Deviate said:... be right back, I gotta lie down and laugh for a while imagining Doctor Insano shouting "LOGIC!" at someone, shooting debate rays from his gloved hands.
Brilliant idea for a Skyrim shout mod \o/Deviate said:... be right back, I gotta lie down and laugh for a while imagining Doctor Insano shouting "LOGIC!" at someone, shooting debate rays from his gloved hands.
I think I'm your polar opposite here, I can't grasp how music is anything more than something to listen to, 9 times out of 10 being background noise, let alone the people that allow their music preferences to suggest how they act and dress it's just alien to me.CrashBang said:...you try to be, there's always that one thing you can't wrap your head around.
For me, it's people who aren't moved by music, people who are fine with listening to the radio or club music because it's easy to dance to or it's simple, people who don't go looking for music that inspires them or brings out all manner of emotion/feeling to the surface (be it joy, excitement, anger, passion etc). These are the things I can't accept/understand, no matter how wide I open my mind.
So what's your one thing that you can't grasp?
Well, it's not the fact that I believe in Heaven or Hell, it's the thought of absolute nothingness after death that scares the shit out of me. I'm all for the "treat others as they've treated you" thing, and I'm a believe in human kindness. I'm not a gung-ho "DO GOOD SHIT UNCONDITIONALLY OR GO TO HELL" guy, I'm more of an act at least partially civilized. So like I said, I just don't like the thought of total oblivion after death. It's not really a me being religious thing.cgaWolf said:Why do you think atheists believe what we do is "for nothing"?OutcastBOS said:I just can't understand atheists...Nothing against them, but I know that I wouldn't be able to go through life at all knowing that everything I've done was for nothing. Not to mention, I don't think I could have the heart to believe that NOTHING happens when you die...it makes me feel a little better thinking that I could live on somewhere, or be re-incarnated, or something. And...It's also nice to think that all this terrible shit happens for a grander plan, rather than just science and nature being an asshole.
I'm generally a nice guy, and if i help someone, why do i need to be motivated either by promise of paradise or threat of eternal damnation? How is a good deed i do "for nothing"? As secular humanist (in addition to my weak atheist position and my anticlericalism), i recognize an innate worth in good deeds. Just because i'm a materialist does not mean i'm a nihilist.
As to a belief in what happens after death - ever religion i've come accross until now has had some rules that simply did not fit well with my personal system of ethics. Thus, i could be religious & happy, and go to hell; or religious and unhappy, and go to heaven. Neither seems very appealing to me. In contrast, my unbelief in life after death brings me to the conclusion that i have this one, and only this one, life to do as best i can, and live as best i will. I may be somewhat hedonistic, but i'm really not faced with a feeling of impending doom or emptiness.
As to nature: it's not an asshole. It's indifferent, and not even that.
It simply is.
No reason not to enjoy it.
Well, for your first point, I believe that God does not (or maybe cannot (I'm not sure he is ALL powerful, since I have not really thought as much on that specific point)) intervene in human affairs. Perhaps he chooses not to for whatever reason. Maybe he doesn't want us to grow dependent on him. Maybe he wants the human race to have experiences, both good and bad. Maybe he knows that the bad things will inspire others, bringing about a greater good. Can we ever really know? Probably not.TheDooD said:The bad thing about that comfort from religion is that it turns people into zealots just so they have more comfort in their hearts. Overall I just can't believe all that comfort mess I know they world is bad really bad yet if there was an all holy being they wouldn't allow a majority of the shit humans do on a daily bases. Not to sound mean it's just I find those so desperate for comfort as weak spirited.
I gone... Well I pretty much forced to a baptist church when I was younger and it kinda pissed me off that people bought into the bullshit these "holy men" were speaking I just couldn't stand the reasoning to get up early to listen to 3 hours of dribble. I can 100% agree with the good will to man and not do stupid part yet the whole fairy tales and undertones of hate I just can't agree with at all.
Yeah, but most religions frown on that sort of logic, to the point of saying that if you worship whatever god BECAUSE you want a chance to win, instead of no chance, then you'll go to hell anyways.Soods said:German grammar...
IT MAKES NO SENSE!!
Edit: So many people saying they can't understand religious people. Here is a slightly logical answer:
If [insert deity here] does exist: you will go to heaven or be reborn as a cow or something.
If it doesn't exist: doesn't matter now that you're dead, does it?
The problem with that argument, however, arises when you look at just how damn many religions there are. Then add to that the fact that many preclude believing in other religions at the same time. How can someone justify the argument that the Greek gods aren't real but the Christian god is?Soods said:German grammar...
IT MAKES NO SENSE!!
Edit: So many people saying they can't understand religious people. Here is a slightly logical answer:
If [insert deity here] does exist: you will go to heaven or be reborn as a cow or something.
If it doesn't exist: doesn't matter now that you're dead, does it?
If you've just shaken the foundation of belief in something, forcing someone to re-evaluate their position, then you need to realize this needs time. Rearranging their view of the world around the new viewpoint isn't instant, and as it's usually accompanied by settling into a previous unknown, it's scary.conflictofinterests said:I don't get people who don't accept when they've been logically proven wrong and refuse to add anything to the conversation after that, even an "Well, that may be, but I still feel this way."
It just boggles the mind.
I'm using that on my next math test.Grunt_Man11 said:1+1=2 is only a fact because people have faith that it is a fact.
If mankind as a whole were to decide that the order the numbers 0-9 are to be changed say 0, 1, 3, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 instead of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.
Then suddenly 1+1=2 stops being a fact.
Facts aren't always concrete. If you really think about it, many are quite fragile and only exist because we allow them to.
I don't find either incomprehensible, but I understand why you do. But one think I don't understand is why bestiality is illegal. I mean, sure it's bad to rend Fido's [expletive deleted] open with your throbbing [expletive deleted] and [expletive deleted] his [expletive deleted] until you're both covered in [expletive deleted], but we already have laws against animal abuse that covers that sort of torture. Like it or not, there are ways to have sex with animals that don't hurt anyone, least of all the animal. I thought we as a society had generally gotten over the notion that gross stuff should be illegal, which is why viagra is legal even though it means your grandpa gets to [expletive del- *is smacked by thread gods* ok I'll stop that...OctoH said:Furries. I cannot fathom that sort of thing. Bestiality also. That's really weird.
I wouldn't call argument a science so much as an art, nor would I call a ray gun science so much as technology, but I would call that scenario hilarious and us both in violation of the edict to not derail shit. So in the spirit of things I offer this:Deviate said:Derail/Off-topic:
It's always amused me that there's an actual science of argumentation. Of course, it's closely tied to a lot of other things that aren't actually about debate or winning/losing them, but it's still amusing as hell once you get into the mindset of imagining a mad scientist (Doctor Insano anyone?) inventing a new Death Ray of Argumentation whereupon he holds the entire audience captive on threat of making their minds explode with SCIENCE!
... be right back, I gotta lie down and laugh for a while imagining Doctor Insano shouting "LOGIC!" at someone, shooting debate rays from his gloved hands.
... what? I've already contributed. I'm allowed nonsensical derails, aren't I? No? Bugger.
I just want to squeeze into this conversation here...Sinclair Solutions said:As for the "more comfort" point, one must remember the old saying: "everything in moderation." Obsessing about anything, from religion to business to even science, will usually bring about a negative effect. It is up to the person, not the religion, to decide whether they should be wholly obsessed. Religions might teach you to devote your whole life to its word, but that is your decision. That is the blessing of free will!TheDooD said:Not to sound mean it's just I find those so desperate for comfort as weak spirited.
It's abusing a position of power.summerof2010 said:But I mean, it's just sex. What's the fuss about?