No Single Player for Command and Conquer: Generals 2

[Imthatguy]

I could give a shit less about Generals but if this happens to the Tiberium series[1]... I don't know what... cry maybe...

[1] I'm aware it's already happening I'm just holding out hope EA was making some quick cash and we'll see a proper[2] C&C4/5.

[2]Proper C&C games have Kane... or mind controlled squids.

 

[GundamSentinel]

So they took one of the franchises I had a lot of fun with and made it free. And now I don't want to play it... Only EA can do such things.

 

[Imthatguy]

OFFTOPIC: Why does Kane insult you and call you weak in the Nod C&C4 (Which doesn't exist) ending but thanks you in the GDI ending? I HATE YOU EA...

 

[Elyxard]

Yes, "Bioware". It's still hilarious that EA is trying to pull that one on us.

I'm starting to believe it's not possible for EA to make a statement that's not fundamentally insulting to their paying fans.

 

[Xan Krieger]

I could cry, this is a horrible tragedy. There needs to be some way to send EA a message that we will not stand for shit of these huge proportions.

 

[Proeliator]

Oh well, Better start just playing the old ones.

Just when you think they've hit rock bottom, they pull out the jackhammers.

 

[Murmillos]

Shameless plug ahead:

I think this is a good time for all of you hating EA's bastardization of C&C as a F2P skirmish only multiplayer game to fund the hell out of Planetary Annihilation @ http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/659943965/planetary-annihilation-a-next-generation-rts

And then send a follow up email to EA stating that a F2P skirmish only multiplayer game is a reason you would rather fund PA, instead if playing their game.

 

[Sir Thomas Sean Connery]

I.... But..... How.....

Spoiler: I'll let you take this one, Mr. Dafoe.

[image/]http://gifsforum.com/images/gif/rage/grand/willem-dafoe-rage-eccbc87e4b5ce2fe28308fd9f2a7baf3-1669.gif[/IMG]

I know I'm hugely in the minority, but General and Zero Hour are some of my favorite RTS games ever.

This is a travesty for any game, but it hits me especially hard as this WAS one of my most anticipated games.

 

[RipRoaringWaterfowl]

Your....... getting rid of campaigns to "get back to the roots of what made Command & Conquer great."

[HEADING=1] Every C&C game had a campaign. Thats not going back! Its trampling over 17 years of the series.[/HEADING]
This is just another kick to the balls. I did some online skirmishes in Generals and it is unbalanced. Maybe if they could handle doing that it would be somewhat better.

This is C&C, not Total Annihilation or even SC2.

This is what made C&C good.


The story, the struggle the cause. The gameplay and cutscenes worked together so well up to about the last of the games.

Bioware, you've no idea what the hell your doing do you? *Shakes head is disbelief"

This. This. THIS.

We know what made C&C great, and it was that, and this:

<youtube=/vN2zeRbu0x4>

 

[MrGalactus]

WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT?
EA, YOU HAVE INCURRED MY WRATH FOR YOUR FINAL TIME!
YOUR PLANET IS NEXT!

 

[Imthatguy]

I could give a shit less about Generals but if this happens to the Tiberium series[1]... I don't know what... cry maybe...

[1] I'm aware it's already happening I'm just holding out hope EA was making some quick cash and we'll see a proper[2] C&C4/5.

[2]Proper C&C games have Kane... or mind controlled squids.

Even the series with mind controlled squids have Kane!

(Skip to 2 minutes and 39 seconds)

God damn Joe Kucan is a charismatic bastard! And I too wish for a proper CnC4/5

Hell even that FPS they were making for Tiberium looked pretty good compared to the crap they put out and will put out

Thats why I had to point out RA2 in particular!

 

[Sir Shockwave]

Isn't Generals the one that absofuckinlutely sucked anyway? The one with shittier AI than any previous C&C game and indeed possibly any previous RTT ever?

Y'know, the one no one would've bought anyway?

Captcha: now and forever. Okay captcha, I know I reinstalled Star Control II last night, but this is ridiculous.

Pretty much, but I would hold Generals & C&C 3 as better than RA3 and C&C 4 - by a *very* thin margin. But Generals remains the point generally regarded by most as where it all went wrong.

OT: I've been playing C&C Games as long as I can remember (for the record - my first *EVER* game *EVER* was Command & Conquer: Red Alert), and not once touched the Multiplayer, excluding a few match ups with friends. This measure turns it into LoL at best (a moderately decent game with a crap community) or End of Nations at worst (which I can't talk about due to NDA).

In a nutshell, I think I'll end up sticking it to both and supporting Iron Grip: Marauders some more.

 

[Lunar Templar]

well there's a shocker, EA going and screwing things up for the fans of a series.

snip

what's your avatar from, cause it looks like the Custodians from Darksiders 2

 

[mirage202]

Well, this seals the deal doesn't it.

C&C4. A gut shot, slow and painful but at the very least there was a tiny chance.
C&C:G2. Finally, thanks for the double tap, can finally put the greatest RTS series to rest.

I have owned every single C&C title released to date, even including unofficial bits like the Code Red map pack for RA1. I have enjoyed them all (Yes, even Renegade, please don't hurt me) right up until C&C4 came out.

Now I know I no longer need hold out hope for this series. Instead I can now focus on wasting away my days hoping Chris Taylor/GPG return to form and make SupCom 3. (2 wasn't *that* bad, but it was no true TA/SC game)

 

[Cid Silverwing]

Just when you think EA cant misunderstand their audience anymore, they out do themselves.

It's this, and/or the fact that they just don't care and literally only want to wring out more money out of a franchise that they stole from people more talented than them. It's up there with having a dipshit District Manager at your GameStop telling a customer that Ratchet & Clank is like Sly Cooper.

 

[RicoADF]

Well that just shows how EA has no idea what made C&C great, it wasn't silly competative MP, it was the campaign (and one thing RA3 did well was adding coop campaign). Congratulations EA, you've made a C&C that I will never touch.

 

[mooncalf]

Your....... getting rid of campaigns to "get back to the roots of what made Command & Conquer great."

Here's my interpretation.
"Get back to the roots of [what we think the market is into right now.]"

That cutscene is everything that was right about early C&C storytelling, It gave you a freeman perspective of few defined characteristics but connected you to events. The blend of conventional, media and environmental warfare (with a pinch of religion) was to me extremely powerful.

I think they just want to transfuse the franchise with today's sturm and drang seriousness of gritty war simulation and competitive RTS. I just can't summon up an ounce of enthusiasm for what they're describing.

 

[Thanos Rider]

It will have SP but not campaign.Just see the Command&Conquer gameplay.

 

[xSerix]

Just thought I'd post this here
http://www.commandandconquer.com/en/news/1380/a-new-future-for-command-conquer
It got cancelled.