Um... isn't the whole main point of buying a vita is to, you know, play Vita games?Zouriz said:Ah, but here is the thing. It discourages people to upgrade their PSP to a Vita. Why should they upgrade if the Vita can't play any of their PSP games?Korten12 said:Plus, isn't the whole main point of buying a vita is to, you know, play Vita games?Fiz_The_Toaster said:That's what I was thinking, I don't know many people that have a PSP, i.e. only one other person, so I don't think it's going to hurt Sony that much in the long run. Yeah it sucks for the people that want to transfer over to the Vita, but really, if you already own the PSP, why would you want to get ride of it when you know for a fact that you can still use it to play games?Korten12 said:It sucks but honestly... The west won't care. Despite what many think, The PSP IS DEAD in the west. It never sold well here, so this probably will have little effect on sales. Plus, I understand the want to have the ability to play old games, but if you didn't have a PSP (which most likely sales will be full of) then this will have little to no effect.
Would I want this UMD system? Hell yes.
Will it effect sales heavily? No.
Still plan on getting the Vita though, even though this news kinda blows.
Here's a different scenario that a lot of gamers have:RikuoAmero said:No-one is has said that Sony is obligated to give us downloadable copies of our PSP games. No, what we're complaining about is poor customer service. Here's the scenario.
Let's say I now have a PSP in my hand (one with a UMD drive, the less said about the Go, the better). I've got a bunch of games on it I've paid money for (let's also assume I bought them all new, so we don't get into the arguments over new vs used). I now hear that Vita is on its way, its the shiny new handheld console, its more powerful and generally better.
However, the main thing keeping me from then buying the Vita is the fact its a separate console. The point of a handheld console is the fact you can carry it around with you, preferably stick it in a pocket, or keep it in the inside pocket of my coat. Now, I have to worry about which of the two handhelds from the same manufacturer I will bring with me. I'm not going to bring both, I already bring my smartphone with me (and that's competition right there, smartphones already have a bunch of great games, at better prices).
So, one way Sony could have persuaded me to buy their new product would have been to offer me downloads of any UMD games I have for the PSP. One way it could have worked would be to stick the disc in the PSP drive, log in to my Sony Account on the PSP and have the option to then register the game to my account. I then log in to my Sony account on the Vita and I'm able to download. Once my downloads are complete, I toss the PSP, and keep the Vita, and then on buying Vita games.
As the Vita is right now, its competing with its manufacturer's own products (which is never a good thing). At the moment, the only Vita game I'm interested in getting is Persona 4, but one game is not enough to get me to buy a machine.
They have a PSP and some games. They have a 3DS and some games. They don't want to bring both. What to do? Well, you make a decision. The same can be said of your PSP/PSV dilemma. You want to play the UMD games? Bring your PSP. No? Then bring your PSV.
Of course the other thing that you've failed to take into account is that the only games available for transfer in Japan are games that are already available digitally. So anything that's a UMD release only isn't even an option for the transfer program.
Furthermore, I don't understand the mindset that is so rigidly attached to UMDs and how many people seem to want a Vita so they can play PSP games on the PSV instead of the PSP they already own.
Where did you come up with that malarkey? I just googled "first rule of business" and nowhere did "be nice" show up. Certainly it can be beneficial to "be nice" to your customers, whatever that means, but it's hardly a rule of business. It sounds more like some pithy bit of wisdom someone who knows nothing about running or building a business.Rainboq said:Alright, Sony, time to go back to business school. Rule one of business is BE NICE TO YOUR CUSTOMERS.
I don't get it... why do you need to play War of the Lions on the Vita? Why not just play it on your PSP? What is the point of spending $250 on hardware to play a game you already own for a system you already own? If there's no games for the PSV that you want right now, then don't buy it and stick with your PSP. The more people that do that, the more reason there is for Sony to consider reducing the price sooner rather than later.Redd the Sock said:If I want to play War of the Lions on the vita, I'd have to pay full PSN price to download it, even though I own the physical copy.
If, like a bunch of dumbass sheep, people go out and buy a PSV all the while bitching they can't play their UMDs, what message does that send to Sony? People are stupid?
This should be such a huge non-issue. The ridiculous emphasis on the ability, or lack thereof, to play old games on new hardware is bizarre, to say the least. When I get a PSV, it will be to play Vita games, not PSP games. I have a PSP for that purpose that works just fine.