At the Yetizen party last year:Evil Smurf said:I approve of this fan service!
But this does'n't really happen does it?
Its a reference to that but also to the various after parties at recent conferences (including by Mojang) where there were rather underdressed dancers, who quite obviously weren't conference attendees. Mojang's excuse was that they were hired by the venue, not them.canadamus_prime said:So is this about that woman who got those guys fired over a dongle joke?
I am not suggesting it makes it okay (because it was a really stupid idea), but they were dancers, not strippers, and it was at a party, not the conference itself.Irridium said:For those who don't know, this is about that conference recently (think it was an IGDA conference) that brought out strippers in what should have been a professional environment for no apparent reason other than to have strippers.
We have strippers in our malls? Since when?Kumagawa Misogi said:Irridium said:For those who don't know, this is about that conference recently (think it was an IGDA conference) that brought out strippers in what should have been a professional environment for no apparent reason other than to have strippers.
Is this another prude USA thing? as in the UK our shopping centre's (malls to you I believe) have strippers during the day all the time and people of all ages just accept it I've never seen women when with there children show any offence anyway.
Err have you been smoking some "special" tobacco? I have never even heard of strippers in shopping centres, could you provide some sort of proof? I know its hard to tell the difference between Essex girls and strippers but Essex girls don't take of their clothes in public until they have had at least 3 hours of drinking time.Kumagawa Misogi said:Is this another prude USA thing? as in the UK our shopping centre's (malls to you I believe) have strippers during the day all the time and people of all ages just accept it I've never seen women when with there children show any offence anyway.
Really? My mistake then.Legion said:I am not suggesting it makes it okay (because it was a really stupid idea), but they were dancers, not strippers, and it was at a party, not the conference itself.Irridium said:For those who don't know, this is about that conference recently (think it was an IGDA conference) that brought out strippers in what should have been a professional environment for no apparent reason other than to have strippers.
Regardless of context, I thought the comic was lampooning how "the industry" and various gamers seem to think "strippers are OK if they're into games", meaning this is a guilt comic.rhizhim said:its you.lacktheknack said:Reading this thread, I'm not sure if everyone else missed the point, or if I missed the point...
your username is lacktheknack.
plus it was during a party and not a conference...
I don't think they do, old chap. Not around these parts anyway. The raciest thing you're likely to see on a normal day in a shopping centre is a lingerie mannequin, which isn't quite the same thing.Kumagawa Misogi said:Irridium said:For those who don't know, this is about that conference recently (think it was an IGDA conference) that brought out strippers in what should have been a professional environment for no apparent reason other than to have strippers.
Is this another prude USA thing? as in the UK our shopping centre's (malls to you I believe) have strippers during the day all the time and people of all ages just accept it I've never seen women when with there children show any offence anyway.
Nothing will ever beat the quantum vagina.wackelpudding said:"Testosterzone" -- my new favourite word!