And shouldn't the suicide rate have stayed lower than average when you still had millions and millions of kids out of school for 18 months in the US? Doing certain things for short periods will cause benefits sometimes while if you did that for long periods, you'll see overall harms. Also what about how the total amount of child abuse reports plummeted during the pandemic, you think child abuse itself actually went down? You have to do entire cost-benefit analysis to see if doing something is causing benefits or harm. You guys never learn.
COVID-19 and the unseen pandemic of child abuse
For children, the collateral damage of the COVID-19 pandemic response has been considerable: ‘nearly insurmountable’ educational losses,1 deteriorating mental health,2 low routine childhood vaccination rates,3 39 billion missed school meals by January 20214 and millions of estimated life-years...
bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com
It was obvious sarcasm...Your grasp of data analysis is so poor that I'm not quite sure whether you believe this or not. I wouldn't be massively surprised anymore.
But that wasn't Prasad's point. He explicitly said it wasn't. Yet again, you're extrapolating conclusions that the researcher himself hasn't drawn, and then nonetheless proudly citing him as a source.
Of course they did: you wouldn't have seen it otherwise.
Prasad has been for doing the cluster randomized trials for 2 years. He's never said masks don't work, he's said over and over again, there's no proof of them working and to do the science so we do know. Also, I'm sure China has mask mandates, how's the spread of covid over there looking right about now?
I'm sure it popped up on my feed because of Paul Offit being a guest. That's the natural process of finding more people. Like you make a friend and then they introduce you to one of their friends and now you have another friend. You're acting like it's some bad method of finding out about other people.