CantFaketheFunk said:
RobCoxxy said:
I think Microsoft would make a fuckton more money if they instead dropped XBLG subscription to a tenner, or made it free a lá PSN.
As XBL already costs the same as a new game, it puts off many players. £100 for 12 months of play would probably kill off any gamers intent on subscribing.
Bad move, drop the price.
I don't know that it does. Gold was estimated at ~20 million subscribers last I checked, which is the majority of people who own a 360. So it seems to me that people are fine with paying <$5 a month. If that doubled, though? I'm not sure.
God I hope they triple it.
I want to prove to people that you can charge suckers any amount of money and they'll take it.
Now that isn't to say everyone on XBOX live is a sucker, that would be a dumbass thing to say, but I'm certain a large portion of the community would buy a mediocre game for 60 bucks, 80 bucks, or even 100 bucks. They'd also likely pay 100 bucks a year just for multiplayer when the features aren't changed (I'm sure it would happen). The amount of people lost would likely not put Microsoft under budget.
Mr_spamamam said:
If Microsoft could get away with it then they would. There are few companies who are so happy to make you pay through the nose for everything they can think of
Yeah I can see how their systems being half as expensive as Macs is trying to get me to pay through the nose.
Plus their music service giving me a CD and access to a massive collection of music every month for the cost of a CD (and recently not even taking away my old stuff after my subscription ended) is them trying to get me to pay through the nose.
Lord knows that free antivirus I got from them specifically with Windows 7 (which I ended up getting for half as much as I've ever paid for a Windows OS and I could have gotten for free by taking one quiz at work) was them trying to get me to pay through the nose.
Likewise the dozens of programs I've gotten for free for either being in college or being a technician.
In fact other than XboX Live and their wireless adapter I can think of nothing off the top of my head currently where they are fucking me any hard than any of their competitors. Keeping in mind I no longer use live nor do I own the adapter, so I'd say they are doing fine.
Though I have heard horror stories of them charging schools for each copy of certain things at full price, but then again I never saw any evidence or news articles to back up those stories.