Why would even!?deth2munkies said:Dude, I've gotten a Dell.
Well I'm not sure what you think the initial investment is supposed to be but honestly even $600 can run plenty of games well if you know what to get (if you don't ask online) and $800-$1000 should be able to run all but some of the most graphically intense or poorly optimized. Not to mention just waiting long enough will have great parts go down in price. So far RAM and hard drives have gone down plenty over the past year and even graphics cards from the past generation (or 2 generations ago for AMD/ATI) hold up amazingly. If those are still too much money fine that's understandable but don't think it's as expensive as the rumors.Mr Smile said:I wish I could start PC gaming, but am ever too poor to make that initial investment
wait what? what sort of braindead person would want to use controller on a PC? One of the strongest PC selling points is ability to use mouse.ph0b0s123 said:Yes, if only you could use controllers on a PC. Oh, wait....Viridian said:For instance, fighting games (Soul Calibur, Mortal Kombat) just plain work better with controllers, and the buttons seem to lend themselves to combos better.
funny thing is, most of the games in this picture are actually bad and sold pretty bad. there were better examples.Qitz said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_lawFijiman said:Have we now stooped to thinking that consoles are just a blemish on the earth that needs to be eradicated? If that's the case then I seem to recall something very similar happening in World War II.lancar said:Long live the PC Master Race.
This is an age old excuse, "PC games are too complicated to get running".Viridian said:Yeah, that's probably part of it. Not to mention that at first glance, consoles just have that "ease of use" feeling, and getting a PC to run a game can be daunting, especially to people who aren't used to messing with stuff. And that's before, "Wait, I can hook it up to the tv?"
F, man. There's a lot of variables to look at there, and without studies that aren't just conjecture from dudes on a forum, who knows what the reason really is?
No the selling point of PC's was you can use what ever controller you want or what ever is best for the job. That's why I don't use mouse and keyboard for racing, I instead use a wheel. There are plenty of game I prefer a joypad to mouse and keyboard. Mouse just happens to be arguably the best controller for FPS type games. Even here thought I don't use a keyboard anymore, but a Logitech G13 gameboard which allows me to use an analog stick for analog movement. That's what the PC is about choice vs consoles forced way of doing things.Strazdas said:wait what? what sort of braindead person would want to use controller on a PC? One of the strongest PC selling points is ability to use mouse.ph0b0s123 said:Yes, if only you could use controllers on a PC. Oh, wait....Viridian said:For instance, fighting games (Soul Calibur, Mortal Kombat) just plain work better with controllers, and the buttons seem to lend themselves to combos better.
also this my look good on the surface, but if you look deeeper, the rise was coming mostly from facebook games and the co. consoles dont even attempt to compete with those, therefore putting the two together is absurd. its like saying "my truck cant float therefore it sucks". its not supposed to.
funny thing is, most of the games in this picture are actually bad and sold pretty bad. there were better examples.Qitz said:
Then why is it that developers are always talking about the ease of development on a console over a PC? It's harder to develop games for different builds. You can't tell me that you've never had a game that either took a long time to get working in a stable condition, or one that you just gave up on trying to run. Yeah, anyone can install a game. What if the game crashes to desktop as soon as you execute? There are so many reasons it could go wrong. Maybe you have a driver that needs updated. Maybe it didn't install correctly. Maybe it needed a day-one patch that you aren't aware of. Yeah, you could google it, but what if it still crashes? These things happen. And they're frustrating. Consoles don't have to deal with that shit.Li Mu said:This is an age old excuse, "PC games are too complicated to get running".Viridian said:Yeah, that's probably part of it. Not to mention that at first glance, consoles just have that "ease of use" feeling, and getting a PC to run a game can be daunting, especially to people who aren't used to messing with stuff. And that's before, "Wait, I can hook it up to the tv?"
F, man. There's a lot of variables to look at there, and without studies that aren't just conjecture from dudes on a forum, who knows what the reason really is?
I would agree that they are very complex if you are mentally challenged but for most people you simply pop in the disc, install and then play. If clicking 'next' 'next' 'place icon on desktop' is seen as complex then I really do worry for people.
My father is pretty rubbish at computers and thought that google IS the internet, but he was able to install a PC game himself due to his ability to read words and click buttons.
There is NO messing unless you really want to mess.
As for the whole 'hooking it up to the TV' point, that is relatively fair. It requires roughly 5 minutes of google searching and perhaps 20 minutes of tinkering (even for a noob) and is certainly not as easy as hooking a console up.
But again, if people are finding such a thing just too damn hard then I despair.
When you use the "PC Games are difficult and that's why people use consoles" argument it just ends up making console gamers sound like utter morons who find even putting food in their mouths a challenge, which just isn't the case.
I'm not sure why you are bringing devs into the argument when it was about the users.Viridian said:Then why is it that developers are always talking about the ease of development on a console over a PC? It's harder to develop games for different builds. You can't tell me that you've never had a game that either took a long time to get working in a stable condition, or one that you just gave up on trying to run. Yeah, anyone can install a game. What if the game crashes to desktop as soon as you execute? There are so many reasons it could go wrong. Maybe you have a driver that needs updated. Maybe it didn't install correctly. Maybe it needed a day-one patch that you aren't aware of. Yeah, you could google it, but what if it still crashes? These things happen. And they're frustrating. Consoles don't have to deal with that shit.
You're right, you didn't. I mentioned it because it was relevant. There are lots of different PC builds, and lots of issues when developing for PC because of different builds. This translates to issues that the consumer has to deal with. Go to the Steam forums. Pick a game. There's always someone with a problem. We can't pretend that ALL of these problems get solved, sometimes you just have to tinker with it on your own or give up. You and your friends never have any trouble? Good for you, other people aren't so lucky.Li Mu said:I'm not sure why you are bringing devs into the argument when it was about the users.Viridian said:Then why is it that developers are always talking about the ease of development on a console over a PC? It's harder to develop games for different builds. You can't tell me that you've never had a game that either took a long time to get working in a stable condition, or one that you just gave up on trying to run. Yeah, anyone can install a game. What if the game crashes to desktop as soon as you execute? There are so many reasons it could go wrong. Maybe you have a driver that needs updated. Maybe it didn't install correctly. Maybe it needed a day-one patch that you aren't aware of. Yeah, you could google it, but what if it still crashes? These things happen. And they're frustrating. Consoles don't have to deal with that shit.
Did I mention games development at all in my post? Nope, I didn't.
As strange as it may sound, I have actually NEVER had any of the problems you have described.
Perhaps I am the only lucky PC gamer in the world.
Strike that, I did have a problem getting Dungeon Keeper 2 to work on Windows Vista.
But given its age it would be no different to trying to get a N64 game working on a Nintendo Wii...which is impossible as you well know.
Old games don't work on most new consoles because they're not back compatible and old games don't work on Windows Vista because it's a retarded pile of poop.
But anyway, regarding your "crashes", I have really only ever had a game crash once or twice. Actually, I can say the same for games crashing on my old PS2. Once I got stuck in Cosmo Canyon whilst playing FFVII. For some reason the game glitched and wouldn't trigger the next part of the story. So lets not pretend that console games are free of crashes or glitches. Infamous RED RING OF DOOM on the Xbox360 anyone?
But in short, no, I have never had the problems you describe and neither have any of my friends. We're not magical Gods of PC gaming, we're just normal people.
Mine too. You should come round sometime, we can discuss overclocking and new graphics card coming out this year.lancar said:The view from my ivory tower is great, indeed.
Long live the PC Master Race.