secretkeeper12 said:
Did I got it correct?
Mike Krahulik and Jerry Holkins are responsible for conflict in Congo?
Oh, silly me of course not. Let me ask this one more time.
Are western consumers of electronics responsible for conflict in Congo?
On a sidenote- are you happen to be from [checks profile] ah yes, from US
It is often easy to tell if one is from US on the internet.
Especially if one fits description of SJW.
How?
Often they posses strange mixture of grandiose delusion, arrogance and self-hatred.
It is if they believe that they are only ones who can save the world and at the same time they are the reason why world needs to be saved in the first place.
Especially if they are white and talk about non-whites.
They grew up in country where non-whites are considered "minority"
So when they see non-white person they automatically think they are minorities everywhere.
As if non-whites are incapable of taking care of themselves and dealing with problems on their own.
[sub][sub]I know this observation was explained crudely, but I'm still working on it- one day I will find a way to express it in more elegant way, so please don't go too harsh on me[/sub][/sub]
My opinion on Congo is original and often not considered.
You may not agree with me, but at least consider this as an option.
So who do I consider responsible for conflict in Congo?
Mike Krahulik and Jerry Holkins? No.
You and me? No.
Western consumers of electronics? Again no.
Only ones truly responsible for current state of Congo are local warlords and their armed thugs.
I know sounds crazy that people waging war are the ones responsible for it.
But hey, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, right?