Just want to point out that a fertility rate of 1.4 is drastically different than a fertility rate of 1.9. If my math is correct, a fertility rate of 1.4 means that within 2 lifetimes, the population could reduce by approximately 50% (assuming fertility rate remains constant throughout). In contrast, a fertility rate of 1.9 would take about 12 lifetimes to reduce by 50%. I guess we can assume the average lifetime is 80 years (not sure about this). I'm also not taking into account potential growth from immigration.Houseman said:He's just saying that they won't say no because of the implication.Rocket Girl said:Is that really the message you want to convey? That Japanese men want a woman that "won't say no"? That's a broad, gross brush.Artaneius said:The Japanese men don't see a point anymore in being in relationships when a sim girl is never going to tell you no or make you do things yourself after work..
I do know that several Asian countries with a fertility rate of 1.3 - 1.4 consider that pretty bad as it results in a weaker economy and increases the burden on the young to support the elderly. Singaporean and Japanese governments have taken steps to increase the fertility rate either by grants and national awareness. I am not aware of Greece's stance on this.