Yeah there's a difference between being in your face and being a nazi. They are the latter.Indigo_Dingo said:And you would go about showing people how these animals are treated how? They tried peaceful solutions and they just got called hippies and written off. Now they try to be a bit more in your face.Nimbus said:Yes, but, like scientologists, they are also pants-on-head retarded.Indigo_Dingo said:PETA are an independent, liberally minded group with a generally younger-than-average membership and a passion for a cause - they are effectively the only group likely to catch on at this point.Nimbus said:I know, right? Next it'll be scientologists.Limos said:How is it PETA is the only organization to recognize Video Games a legitimate medium? I mean really? PETA?
I wouldn't mind them being "in [my] face" so much if they didn't lie so much. Telling primary-school kids that drinking milk will make your face break out in zits... or that they're "rescuing" animals only to kill them...Indigo_Dingo said:And you would go about showing people how these animals are treated how? They tried peaceful solutions and they just got called hippies and written off. Now they try to be a bit more in your face.
I dunno, as long as you tenderise it first and marinate it well, could be quite succulent.HalfShadow said:Let's eat PETA members.
Sure, their meat will be stringy and probably poisonous, but we'll be making a point.
Actually there is a game called scientology pwned were you mow down hords pf scientologists trying to headbutt you to death. But i dont think scientologist endorse it in any way.Nimbus said:I know, right? Next it'll be scientologists.Limos said:How is it PETA is the only organization to recognize Video Games a legitimate medium? I mean really? PETA?
I love how PETA said that in a press release when there's a blood-stained Majesco logo in the picture of the opening post. Did anyone else see that after reading their statement and think that was kinda odd?Malygris said:Mama Kills Animals wasn't meant as an attack on either the Cooking Mama series or publisher Majesco [http://www.majescoentertainment.com/], the group claimed...
Considering that herbivore animals tend to taste better, I wonder if human vegetarians/vegans taste better than human meat eaters?HalfShadow said:Let's eat PETA members.
Sure, their meat will be stringy and probably poisonous, but we'll be making a point.
Well that and humans are omnivores thanks to evolution and meat (and meat byproducts such as milk) carries essential nutrients the body needs to work properly, but why let facts get in the way of outright lying, right?Indigo_Dingo said:Thank you for giving me the perfect example of why PETA keep doing this.HalfShadow said:...overlooking the fact that most people do not care.Indigo_Dingo said:And you would go about showing people how these animals are treated how? They tried peaceful solutions and they just got called hippies and written off. Now they try to be a bit more in your face.
The last time I checked, meat is dead; why should I or anyone give a damn if it had 'a happy life'? It's dead and I just cooked and ate it. It's irrelevant. It's only purpose is to be killed, cooked and eaten.
For the record, I am not a member of PETA. What I am is a person who doesn't believe that animals should be born into a living hell and then slaughtered just cause you guys prefer the taste slightly over tofu.
You tell them Dingo! **munches on celery (with peanut butter in the middle, it's really nice)**Indigo_Dingo said:Don't piss us off, we'll do it.
Actually, I prefer the taste VASTLY over tofu, but that's beside the point. I have no problem with vegetarians and vegans... they can eat what they want to eat, no skin off my nose. PETA on the other hand tries to dictate what I should be eating, wearing, caring for, using, etc. They'd like me to stop eating meat (my ancestors did NOT claw their way to the top of the food chain so I could eat lettuce), they demand I stop wearing leather (find me another natural material that works, wears and protects as well and we'll talk), they don't even want me keeping my beloved pets! If they had their way, I wouldn't even be allowed to take the gelatin capsules I take for my joints.Indigo_Dingo said:Thank you for giving me the perfect example of why PETA keep doing this.HalfShadow said:...overlooking the fact that most people do not care.Indigo_Dingo said:And you would go about showing people how these animals are treated how? They tried peaceful solutions and they just got called hippies and written off. Now they try to be a bit more in your face.
The last time I checked, meat is dead; why should I or anyone give a damn if it had 'a happy life'? It's dead and I just cooked and ate it. It's irrelevant. It's only purpose is to be killed, cooked and eaten.
For the record, I am not a member of PETA. What I am is a person who doesn't believe that animals should be born into a living hell and then slaughtered just cause you guys prefer the taste slightly over tofu.
More likly a little zinger by Blizzard.HSIAMetalKing said:I'm wondering whether or not PETA had any involvement with the creation of DEHTA (Druids for the Ethical and Humane Treatment of Animals) in the new WoW expansion. For those of you that don't play, they are a small group in the game that sends you on quests to kill poachers and rescue trapped animals.
While it's likely that Blizzard simply inserted them into the game as a reference to PETA, with all this "video game" related press PETA is creating I can't help but wonder if they, perhaps, had something to do with it.