Physicist Definitively Rules Time Travel Impossible

Recommended Videos

Wintermoot

New member
Aug 20, 2009
6,559
0
0
even IF timetravel is possible isn't there a outcome where the present time would be fucked up (like killing the guy that invented the light bulb or microchip)
 

mattsipple4000

New member
Mar 2, 2011
77
0
0
hurricanejbb said:
Of course time travel is impossible. Everyone knows the Langoliers eat the past.
LOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!! all food from the past tastes like cardboard! i used to love that film! hahahhaa
 

mattsipple4000

New member
Mar 2, 2011
77
0
0
how does anybody know that people haven't travelled back in time ?? how does anyone know if Hitler wasn't assassinated ?? if people had gone back from the future then they would bounce about saying hey i just came back! it would be like those episodes of Star Trek when they want to observe a civilisation in its making! using futuristic technology's to hide themselves and their plans while watching and maybe intercepting in some major points in history!
i dont know the science of time travel at all! just arguing that 1 point made!
 

tehweave

Gaming Wildlife
Apr 5, 2009
1,942
0
0
WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY WHY MUST YOU MURDER MY INNOCENCE AND DREAMS WITH SCIENCE? WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
 

ImmortalDrifter

New member
Jan 6, 2011
661
0
0
People 500 years ago, said it was impossible to light a room with the flip of a switch. It's only a matter of time before people find a loophole.
 

SL33TBL1ND

Elite Member
Nov 9, 2008
6,467
0
41
I'm pretty sure that if time is just another dimension we could find a way to move through it.
 

Megacherv

Kinect Development Sucks...
Sep 24, 2008
2,650
0
0
SilentHunter7 said:
Megacherv said:
Actually, he's not ruled out time travel into the future, which is sort-of possible. The faster you're moving, the slower time goes for you. Here's an example

You have 2 (theoretically) identical clocks. One stays in the exact same spot in on the planet, moving at the speed of the earth's orbit, whilst one is sent round the earth at such a speed that it returns to to its starting position (next to the other clock) in exactly one hour. The clock that orbited the earth in an hour would be slightly behind the other one, as it travelled faster.

Sure, it's not instant time-travel, but it's similar
You can time travel into the future (Technically, everyone is doing it as we speak), but not into the past. Because the closer you get to the speed of light, the slower time goes for you.

For example; Alpha Centauri is 4 light years away. If you were to take a ship and travel there near the speed of light, it would take you 4 years to get there, but for everyone on the ship, it would only seem like a few hours. You essentially travel 4 years into the future.

Going into the past would require exceeding the local speed of light, which would require more than an infinite amount of energy to do. It would also destroy causality, which opens up a whole new can of worms, physics-wise.

Well, that's the theory, anyway.
Destroy Casualty? As in the TV show? Fuck it, I'll risk it for that
 

Rainforce

New member
Apr 20, 2009
692
0
0
but what about the whole "the closer to s.o.l. the slower your time" thing?
I mean, that MAKES it semiposible to travel "through" time.
(oh wait, totally covered with above post. damn.)
 

Soviet Steve

New member
May 23, 2009
1,509
0
0
It was impossible for humans to survive going faster than 30 kilometers per hour two centuries ago. Not saying he's wrong but science is always up for updates.
 

TilMorrow

Diabolical Party Member
Jul 7, 2010
3,246
0
0
If we can travel back in time in an alternative universe via travel from Uni A (ours) to Uni B then shouldn't it theoretically be possible the other way round? Travel from Uni A to a point in time in Uni B then travel back again to Uni A to a different time period. Problem solved, Time Travel is now possible in our Universe, that guy didn't think his theory all the way through.
 

NoNameMcgee

New member
Feb 24, 2009
2,104
0
0
joeman098 said:
I saw this Stephen Hawking show about time travel and he believed that going backwards was impossible but going forward by traveling at near light speed was! just it is a one way ticket
I saw that too, and im more inclined to believe Mr. Hawking!
 

the1ultimate

New member
Apr 7, 2009
768
0
0
If there is one thing we know it's that you can't 100% disprove anything.

Admittedly I want to believe in time travel for my own selfish reasons, but even so, this is just a paper at the moment, and we've yet to see these results properly digested by the rest of the scientific community.
 

Live4Lotus

New member
Dec 5, 2009
70
0
0
This explains why marty started to disappear earlier than he should have...some other time traveler was doing the same thing in another dimension...about 1 minute earlier.
 

mrF00bar

New member
Mar 17, 2009
591
0
0
As it so happens I know a time traveler, or he could just be mentally unstable but I prefer to believe the latter. So meh.