even IF timetravel is possible isn't there a outcome where the present time would be fucked up (like killing the guy that invented the light bulb or microchip)
LOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!! all food from the past tastes like cardboard! i used to love that film! hahahhaahurricanejbb said:Of course time travel is impossible. Everyone knows the Langoliers eat the past.
Destroy Casualty? As in the TV show? Fuck it, I'll risk it for thatSilentHunter7 said:You can time travel into the future (Technically, everyone is doing it as we speak), but not into the past. Because the closer you get to the speed of light, the slower time goes for you.Megacherv said:Actually, he's not ruled out time travel into the future, which is sort-of possible. The faster you're moving, the slower time goes for you. Here's an example
You have 2 (theoretically) identical clocks. One stays in the exact same spot in on the planet, moving at the speed of the earth's orbit, whilst one is sent round the earth at such a speed that it returns to to its starting position (next to the other clock) in exactly one hour. The clock that orbited the earth in an hour would be slightly behind the other one, as it travelled faster.
Sure, it's not instant time-travel, but it's similar
For example; Alpha Centauri is 4 light years away. If you were to take a ship and travel there near the speed of light, it would take you 4 years to get there, but for everyone on the ship, it would only seem like a few hours. You essentially travel 4 years into the future.
Going into the past would require exceeding the local speed of light, which would require more than an infinite amount of energy to do. It would also destroy causality, which opens up a whole new can of worms, physics-wise.
Well, that's the theory, anyway.
I saw that too, and im more inclined to believe Mr. Hawking!joeman098 said:I saw this Stephen Hawking show about time travel and he believed that going backwards was impossible but going forward by traveling at near light speed was! just it is a one way ticket