Weeell, look at it from the other side, isn't there also a rather lack of games that are exclusive to consoles with no PC release?LorienvArden said:Super Meat Boy wasn't an PC exclusive and Minecraft is an indi title, both which don't fall into the "expensive big PC exclusives" they talk about.The_root_of_all_evil said:Says the relatively unknown person who ignores things like Minecraft. And Super MeatBoy. And that console piracy does exist. And that sometimes games fail because...they fail.
Could it be that Titan Quest, despite being good, was really just Mythical Diablo?
Red Dead Redemption was the last BIG third-party title to not get a PC release and that was 2 years ago while Rockstar is now giving Max Payne 3 and GTA-5 a PC release in 2012 as well as the rest of the games made under 2K. I suppose Dark Souls but things may be changing on that, and it's hardly much of a trend.
PC still gets to enjoy all the CoD, Skyrim, Arkham City, LA Noire, Assassin's Creed and so on.
I don't think it's relevant to compare first-party games as of course Sony/Nintendo have a conflict of interest to not release their game on PC regardless of demand as they are using artificial exclusivity to increase sales of their system. This has ALWAYS been the case since the 1980's and before. It's not illustrative of anything that Uncharted is PS3 exclusive. Even Halo's exclusivity can be linked to how Microsoft can simply make more money selling on 360 than on PC hence Halo exclusivity - regardless of the state of piracy.
Halo exclusivity means people buy Xbox 360s then they buy more games for X360 at $12-16 for every game licensed on their system.
And of course there ARE big exclusives for PC that aren't tiny indie titles:
-Dota 2
-Trackmania 2
-Witcher 2 (a year of PC exclusivity)
-Dawn of War II Retribution
-Starcraft II
-Arma III
-Mechwarrior Online
-Blacklight Retribution
-Diablo 3
-Hawken
From just recently and the near future. All those are third-party of course as no one can licence PC programs there is no first-party.