I guess we're the only ones who read past the catchy title?Zolcos said:Article is flat-out lying. That guy isn't "decrying" piracy, he is upset over the fact that his BETA got spread around. Don't you realize that if there were flaws in his untested beta that, say, bricked peoples iPhones, it would make him look like an idiot at best, or a virus writer at worst, and people would parade it around as a reason to not trust unapproved apps. It only makes sense that he would want to finish it before people started using it. Did they miss that he was going to distribute it for FREE?
There is no irony here, this is just part anti-piracy propoganda, part trolling.
Actually, I disagree. If you read the quote, what bothers him is obviously that what happened, happened to him, not that people could be hurt by it, hence all the warbling about being disrespected. Logic would dictate that since he was going to release it for free anyway, if god forbid people could get their mitts on a beta copy without his consent, he'd shrug it off, give people a warning that it could damage their products, and carry on developing. What has he really lost? Nothing, he wasn't really going to gain anything by it anyway and now people know it's a pirated release he won't take the reputation hit. But he's massively offended and threatens to cancel the project. It's the concept that really bothers him, as opposed to possible consequences of that concept, and that concept is piracy. QED.Zolcos said:Article is flat-out lying. That guy isn't "decrying" piracy, he is upset over the fact that his BETA got spread around. Don't you realize that if there were flaws in his untested beta that, say, bricked peoples iPhones, it would make him look like an idiot at best, or a virus writer at worst, and people would parade it around as a reason to not trust unapproved apps. It only makes sense that he would want to finish it before people started using it. Did they miss that he was going to distribute it for FREE?
There is no irony here, this is just part anti-piracy propoganda, part trolling.
What are you talking about? There are 17 ninjas in that title. You just have to look real close.The_root_of_all_evil said:Needs more ninjas.CantFaketheFunk said:Best headline ever.
State sponsored rapists? Eh, maybe not such a great idea.TheBluesader said:I wonder...back a couple centuries ago, during the heyday of ARR! piracy, were any of those pirates pirated themselves? Like, did one of those British corsairs knock over a Spanish galleon, only to be hit itself on the way home by a rogue Spanish privateer?
Because that would make a great movie.
I in general always get a big kick out of it when criminals get criminalized themselves. In fact, I think that should be the nature of their punishment. The State should do to you what you've done to others. We do that in America with murder, and I think we should do it with rape and assault.
You know what? When I proposed my plan for kick-ass justice, I didn't even think about the logistical consequences. I mean, I'm sure there would be guys who would volunteer to do the raping for the government if the money was good enough. But you're right, I really don't want to live in the same country with that variety of desperate bastard.Singing Gremlin said:State sponsored rapists? Eh, maybe not such a great idea.
Probably skulking in the shadows. Silly, silly ninja. Didn't Khell have a break for a while? (I missed his rants, but hassah today I recieved my next piece of epicness.)The_root_of_all_evil said:Everything gets better with more ninjas. BTW, where is Purp these days? He's gone awfully quiet.nathan-dts said:Dont you mean pirates? (The war between ninjas and pirates was won by the ninjas decades ago but pirates still deserve there credit)The_root_of_all_evil said:Needs more ninjas.CantFaketheFunk said:Best headline ever.
I'm not too well versed in law, which law would that be?Byers said:Well. For a company whose only response to my ipod suddenly ceasing to work after less than two years is that I should buy a new one (as replacing the expired battery would cost more than the price of a new ipod), I find it difficult to take Apple's side in any argument of the moral kind.
It is one's right by law to demand several of Apple's products lasting for years beyond what they generally have done so far, even with careful use, so if some people want to reimburse themselves a little, I can't say I have a strong urge to rush to the defense of the poor little multi billion dollar corporation.
First of all, give the people around here some more credit. Of course everyone read the article. Second, it still is piracy. It doesn't matter that this program was a free project or not, the early beta was leaked (which is just another word for "stolen") and then distributed against his wishes and he was getting pissy about it. That's textbook piracy. Besides, if the program did screw up someone's iPhone after downloading it, then that's just karma's way of sorting them out for downloading a program that helps them pirate software.Zolcos said:Article is flat-out lying. That guy isn't "decrying" piracy, he is upset over the fact that his BETA got spread around. Don't you realize that if there were flaws in his untested beta that, say, bricked peoples iPhones, it would make him look like an idiot at best, or a virus writer at worst, and people would parade it around as a reason to not trust unapproved apps. It only makes sense that he would want to finish it before people started using it. Did they miss that he was going to distribute it for FREE?
There is no irony here, this is just part anti-piracy propoganda, part trolling.