So the publisher is doing the whole copyright thing, because she doenst have the rights.
and this is all her fault?
and this is all her fault?
maybe she needed a publisher and this was the only way to do it?ThatDarnCoyote said:I can think of 100,000 reasons why.McMullen said:Not sure why she did what she did.
All the complaints that blame the publisher miss an important point. Namely, that a prominent member of a political organization that almost exclusively focuses on copyright issues is now pretending (after cashing the fat check) that she was too stupid to understand the nature of the fairly standard copyright contract she was signing.
She'd probably be better off admitting to hypocrisy.