...I don't get why you don't think you're attacking a strawman. It doesn't matter what everyone in this country does (not that it makes it right), we're talking about whether or not in this instance, concerning a regionally distributed (or undistributed, as it were) game, it's justified/legal.Kahunaburger said:No, I'm pointing out that basically everyone in this country violates intellectual property on a pretty regular basis, and implying that perhaps some people (particularly on this site, for some reason) respond to software piracy as if this were not the case.LiquidSolstice said:A strawman is a strawman. I'm surprised that even a picture wasn't enough to clarify this to you.Kahunaburger said:Intellectual property is intellectual property. I'm surprised this is such a tricky concept for you.
Maybe I need to explain, before you do the usual forum response of "omg troll". If we were arguing about piracy as a whole, I'd lend what you say to have credence. Otherwise, what you are doing is a picture perfect definition of attacking a strawman.
As clever as you might have thought you were being, that logic isn't required in this thread.