Pokemon Black and White Version 2 Review

Sarah LeBoeuf

New member
Apr 28, 2011
2,084
0
0
Pokemon Black and White Version 2 Review

It's more of the same, but you?ll still want to catch ?em all

Read Full Article
 

Dragoon

New member
Jan 19, 2010
889
0
0
Black and White are still the only generation I haven't finished but I may give it another go with this.
 

Sarah LeBoeuf

New member
Apr 28, 2011
2,084
0
0
DustlessDragoon said:
Black and White are still the only generation I haven't finished but I may give it another go with this.
Same, however I just have had a lot of other games to play instead. I need to sit down and beat those last few gym leaders and finish off the Elite Four.
 

subtlefuge

Lord Cromulent
May 21, 2010
1,107
0
0
I'm glad the preorder bonus is oh so unimpressive. I can give it a pass until Black Friday or later. Still want to do this, just because of how much I loved B/W compared to any other game other than HG/SS.
 

ItemCrisis

New member
Sep 17, 2012
5
0
0
There is nothing I can do about it. Ever since the first game, each new one really is the same thing over and over again, but I am addicted. This is compounded by the fact that I have no new 3DS game to play instead. Here we go again...
 

neonsword13-ops

~ Struck by a Smooth Criminal ~
Mar 28, 2011
2,771
0
0
DustlessDragoon said:
Black and White are still the only generation I haven't finished but I may give it another go with this.
Same here.

I didn't have it in me to finish the White. I just didn't like any of the new Pokemon desgins (except Snivy, Roggenrola, and Emolga. Those guys were boss) and I felt like the battles felt a little same-y after a while.

But I will not say that it was terrible. I liked the story and walking to the Elite 4 on Victory Road was epic. I really loved how all of the music layered.

Anyway, I can't wait to pick this one up. Battling all of the past gym leaders and champions will be a good challenge. :D
 

gardian06

New member
Jun 18, 2012
403
0
0
indentured servitude away. what the theme song should have been:
I wanna be the very best
like no one ever was
to enslave them is my real test
to own them is my cause

I will travel across the land
searching far, and wide
each pokemon to do the work
the power I control
...

I think this is a lot more accurate.
captcha: dog's dinner. oh ownership.
 

chozo_hybrid

Jund 'Em Out!
Jul 15, 2009
3,456
0
0
I'm glad to see they are starting to make use of the systems graphical capabilities, aside from Stadium etc is this the first main Pokemon game to have 3d graphics in it? I'm curious, I don't play them but I used to, from red up to silver.
 

Roroshi14

New member
Dec 3, 2009
193
0
0
Black and White were the first game that I played competitively. And mastered. So I am so psyched for Black 2! FINALLY I CAN CATCH AN EEVEE AND GROWLITHE!!!! Woo!
 

TJC

New member
Aug 28, 2011
398
0
0
It baffles me that people actually review the main pokemon games which remain unchanged from pretty much gold/silver onwards (except for recolouring... everything D: )
Nothing has changed and I can already forsee the "innovation" of the next pokemon game (aside from another 100ish of them pokemans):

QUADRUPLE BATTLES (quintuple if they're feeling generous)

*sigh*

Hey, capcom, gamefreaks, you're so hot on cross-overs nowadays. How about a monster hunter/pokemon game? I long for hunting down a herd of zebstrika and blitzle while actually riding on my muthafucking arcanine or actually explore a mind-blowing distortion world.
 

hickwarrior

a samurai... devil summoner?
Nov 7, 2007
429
0
0
You know what I would like? A pokémon game that just doesn't follow suit. One like a tale of shin megami tensei, but with a happier start, a middle and then an end. And the gym leaders would be optional except for the first one. The badges give interesting benefits, but would discard the whole 'pokémon will keep disobeying you if you don't have this badge.'

That is wishful thinking though. And I do agree, whenever I felt I wanted to train pokémon, well I would buy a pokémon. However, I'll probably be waiting for the next gen to come out and pass on this gen. I've got enough games to finish as it is.
 

Sarah LeBoeuf

New member
Apr 28, 2011
2,084
0
0
TJC said:
It baffles me that people actually review the main pokemon games which remain unchanged from pretty much gold/silver onwards (except for recolouring... everything D: )
Nothing has changed and I can already forsee the "innovation" of the next pokemon game (aside from another 100ish of them pokemans):

QUADRUPLE BATTLES (quintuple if they're feeling generous)

*sigh*

Hey, capcom, gamefreaks, you're so hot on cross-overs nowadays. How about a monster hunter/pokemon game? I long for hunting down a herd of zebstrika and blitzle while actually riding on my muthafucking arcanine or actually explore a mind-blowing distortion world.
"Nothing changes...ever"

This comment is invalid when a new Madden is released. It is invalid when a new CoD or Halo or FF is released. It is invalid when a new Pokemon is released. A lot of stuff is changed, but if you only look at the superficial, you won't see it.

OT: Like the games, don't own a DS, so...
 

Terminate421

New member
Jul 21, 2010
5,773
0
0
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
TJC said:
It baffles me that people actually review the main pokemon games which remain unchanged from pretty much gold/silver onwards (except for recolouring... everything D: )
Nothing has changed and I can already forsee the "innovation" of the next pokemon game (aside from another 100ish of them pokemans):

QUADRUPLE BATTLES (quintuple if they're feeling generous)

*sigh*

Hey, capcom, gamefreaks, you're so hot on cross-overs nowadays. How about a monster hunter/pokemon game? I long for hunting down a herd of zebstrika and blitzle while actually riding on my muthafucking arcanine or actually explore a mind-blowing distortion world.
"Nothing changes...ever"

This comment is invalid when a new Madden is released. It is invalid when a new CoD or Halo or FF is released. It is invalid when a new Pokemon is released. A lot of stuff is changed, but if you only look at the superficial, you won't see it.

OT: Like the games, don't own a DS, so...
Actually Halo changes, its quite the stereo type that Halo 3 is the exact same as Halo: Reach.....

Pokemon is no exception, it changes enough to be different from its predecessors, yes you have the same gameplay and usage but it changes enough to feel and flow totally different.
 

The Knightly Gamer

New member
Jan 5, 2011
176
0
0
karloss01 said:
So basically its a GOTY edition. i would think about it if i had a 3DS.
It's for the DS so you can still play. I dont think enough 3DS have sold yet for Nintendo to risk a 3DS only Pokemon game.
 

TJC

New member
Aug 28, 2011
398
0
0
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
TJC said:
It baffles me that people actually review the main pokemon games which remain unchanged from pretty much gold/silver onwards (except for recolouring... everything D: )
Nothing has changed and I can already forsee the "innovation" of the next pokemon game (aside from another 100ish of them pokemans):

QUADRUPLE BATTLES (quintuple if they're feeling generous)

*sigh*

Hey, capcom, gamefreaks, you're so hot on cross-overs nowadays. How about a monster hunter/pokemon game? I long for hunting down a herd of zebstrika and blitzle while actually riding on my muthafucking arcanine or actually explore a mind-blowing distortion world.
"Nothing changes...ever"

This comment is invalid when a new Madden is released. It is invalid when a new CoD or Halo or FF is released. It is invalid when a new Pokemon is released. A lot of stuff is changed, but if you only look at the superficial, you won't see it.

OT: Like the games, don't own a DS, so...
Oh yes, the introduction of EVs and IVs, egg-moves, breeding, natures etc added a lot to promote a pretty decent competitive experience and I do think that gamefreaks will continue to hone and build that background to give more to players who want more out of the games. The overworld and dungeons are vastly different and there are new monsters that freshen up my teams. also, there's always some sort of other competition or play or thing going on but I could never give enough of crap because I was a manly man and manly man's pokemon need to BATTLE!

Still, the comparisons don't really hold. CoD and especially FF always had new things to offer that were new for both fans of the series and newcomer. And I see that kids who never played a pokemon game before won't have any of these issues I have. But after 6 games (blue, silver, emerald, diamond, heartgold and white) is it asking for much to avoid some of the cookiecutter things? Like not being a 10-year-old boy (or GIRL) out to become Pokemon Master by beating progressively stronger gymleaders and eventually the best four trainers plus master while beating one or two ominous teams with a hidden/evil agenda on the way.

They don't even have to deviate from the "collect 8 MacGuffins to unlock boss rush" formula. Instead of badges make it elemental stones required to save the world or something. And you have to fight your rival for possession of these again and again because he beat you to the chase or something. ANYTHING, really to make the experience feel new again.
 

karloss01

New member
Jul 5, 2009
991
0
0
The Knightly Gamer said:
karloss01 said:
So basically its a GOTY edition. i would think about it if i had a 3DS.
It's for the DS so you can still play. I dont think enough 3DS have sold yet for Nintendo to risk a 3DS only Pokemon game.
Really? oh i'll consider it then.
 

Sarah LeBoeuf

New member
Apr 28, 2011
2,084
0
0
To be honest, I find the combat in Pokemon very slow and very dated, it's slow, even for a turn-based game. I keep trying to force myself to play Black...but I would like to try this...but I will wait.
 

CrazyCapnMorgan

Is not insane, just crazy >:)
Jan 5, 2011
2,742
0
0
Of all of the things I'm looking forward to in these games, the music is amongst the top of the list. GameFreak outdid themselves with the music they put together.

Not to mention with the Pokemon World Tournament, you can face off against all of your favorite Gym Leaders and Champions from the past. I am SO looking forward to kicking Cynthia's arse all over the place...again.
 

The Ubermensch

New member
Mar 6, 2012
345
0
0
I'll get it, cause god damn, fuck you statistics! You drive me to battle! ...EV and IV *shudder*

But one thing, I want my leading pokemon to follow me around like in heartgold/soulsilver/Yellow

Nintendo; why isn't that a staple of the franchise yet!?!

My Gardevoir should not be confined to a damn pokeball

Neither should my Ponyta
 

disgruntledgamer

New member
Mar 6, 2012
905
0
0
This game is getting criticized on other sites for being the same as the 1st Black and white. Not that it matters IMO you just use Water on Fire, Fire on Grass and Grass on Water and call it strategy. Sorry but Rock, Paper, Scissors strategy is not hard to master unless you're 12 or touched in the head. Using whatever the other person is weak against isn't hard to figure out.
 

Skeleon

New member
Nov 2, 2007
5,410
0
0
Heh, yeah, I've stopped playing part 1 at the Elite Four. I'd have to really grind, grind, grind to get powerful enough to defeat them and I'm just not interested right now.
I seriously doubt I'll buy any of these new ones, unless they release a "Grey Edition" with parts 1 and 2 meshed together or something (maybe along the lines that you could go back to the original games' map in Silver and Gold).
Has there ever been a game where you could get all Pokemon on your own, by the way? I have zero interest in trading, conventions or whatever. I'm an old dude by now.

disgruntledgamer said:
Sorry but Rack, Paper, Scissors strategy is not hard to master unless you're 12 or touched in the head.
Hm, a big rack could surely knock me out as well. What Pokemon-type would that make me I wonder?
 

Sonic Doctor

Time Lord / Whack-A-Newbie!
Jan 9, 2010
3,042
0
0
CrazyCapnMorgan said:
Of all of the things I'm looking forward to in these games, the music is amongst the top of the list. GameFreak outdid themselves with the music they put together.

Not to mention with the Pokemon World Tournament, you can face off against all of your favorite Gym Leaders and Champions from the past. I am SO looking forward to kicking Cynthia's arse all over the place...again.
Totally agree with that.

----------------------
If I ever reviewed new main franchise Pokemon games, I would never mark off for similarity in formula(Battle system, gym battling to get to the top, parts of story style). The formula is pretty much perfect. All I've ever cared about is new events and things to do, and I can see that B&W2 gives that, plus even new places to go on the same map. The people wanting change and different kinds of games, that is what the Pokemon side franchise games are for.

The only big change lately that Game Freak has made to the main franchise was in the first B&W with TMs now being infinite use, which really was the last needed change for the formula.

Heck, I wouldn't even take off for Game Freak using the same Pokemon sprites from B&W into this sequel, since this isn't a generation changing game, so there really isn't a need to do all the work to change the sprites now, when it will happen with the actual next generation(most likely on the 3DS).

I would most likely give B&W2 a four out of five. One off only because there isn't a new generation wow factor. No reason to take any more off than necessary.
 

Padwolf

New member
Sep 2, 2010
2,062
0
0
I will still be getting it because god damn I'm a pokemon addict. I have to have all the pokemon games! Have to play and enjoy them all, have to enjoy all the amazing music in the games, all the wonderful and weird and silly pokemon. B&W2 sounds really good. I want it now!
 

Neoseek

New member
Mar 14, 2010
37
0
0
CrazyCapnMorgan said:
Of all of the things I'm looking forward to in these games, the music is amongst the top of the list. GameFreak outdid themselves with the music they put together.

Not to mention with the Pokemon World Tournament, you can face off against all of your favorite Gym Leaders and Champions from the past. I am SO looking forward to kicking Cynthia's arse all over the place...again.
I agree, the remixed themes are awesome.




It is a shame they didn't include the e4 from all the gens too.
 

Buizel91

Autobot
Aug 25, 2008
5,265
0
0
You can trade with the 4th gen games as well? o_O not just sending Pokemon over, but actually...Trade?

FUCKING STOKED! finally i can send Pokemon from Gen 4 and send them back if i want to! i have wanted to do that since Gen 3!
 

Buizel91

Autobot
Aug 25, 2008
5,265
0
0
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
I'll get it, cause god damn, fuck you statistics! You drive me to battle! ...EV and IV *shudder*

But one thing, I want my leading pokemon to follow me around like in heartgold/soulsilver/Yellow

Nintendo; why isn't that a staple of the franchise yet!?!

My Gardevoir should not be confined to a damn pokeball

Neither should my Ponyta
Agreed, even if it is only the starter Pokemon that can follow you, it should be kept that way!

It's one of the main reasons i keep going back to SS.
 

Buizel91

Autobot
Aug 25, 2008
5,265
0
0
disgruntledgamer said:
This game is getting criticized on other sites for being the same as the 1st Black and white. Not that it matters IMO you just use Water on Fire, Fire on Grass and Grass on Water and call it strategy. Sorry but Rack, Paper, Scissors strategy is not hard to master unless you're 12 or touched in the head. Using whatever the other person is weak against isn't hard to figure out.
But that isn't just it, Quilava can learn Wild Charge by TM which is an Electric move, so if you are battling a guy with a Wartortle, and your Quilava is quicker, it can potentially K.O that Wartortle or at least do a lot of damage, where as normally a Quilava wouldn't be any match.

You can confine your Fire types to just fire moves, or your psychic to just psychic moves, but if you do that your missing the point entirely.

It is possible to teach your Pokemon moves to counter it's weakness's and don't forget that, it really isn't as simple as you think.
 

wyldchyld337

New member
May 24, 2011
24
0
0
I've been playing the Pokemon games starting from Blue, Gold, Sapphire, Pearl, Platinum, Heart Gold, and White. In all those iterations, the core gameplay has changed very little. What has changed is the subtle, behind-the-wall, things such as EVs/IVs and the Meta-gameplay. For the Meta alone am I excited for these new ones as well. All they would need to make this perfect, in my eyes, would be to bring back the Battle Arcade from Heart Gold/Soul Silver (I was a big fan of the Battle Factory and "renting" 'Mons to use for battling).

As an added benefit, I am now 32 and my daughter will be turning 9 in Dec. She learned how to read thanks to playing an old copy of Fire Red that we had around the house. This is yet another reason why any Pokemon game is "serious business" around my house. Having two copies makes it that much easier to "Catch Them All."

--Captcha--
"It's Super Delicious"
 

Sarah LeBoeuf

New member
Apr 28, 2011
2,084
0
0
disgruntledgamer said:
This game is getting criticized on other sites for being the same as the 1st Black and white. Not that it matters IMO you just use Water on Fire, Fire on Grass and Grass on Water and call it strategy. Sorry but Rack, Paper, Scissors strategy is not hard to master unless you're 12 or touched in the head. Using whatever the other person is weak against isn't hard to figure out.
But you get a strategy when you can choose from a giant roster of Pokes, all with different combinations of types (electro/bug, fire/fight, fire/bug and so on), all with several possible movesets and different stat and EV spreads (aka different speed, attack strength, defensive strength) and items. If you have to build a team of 6 where each one has to hold a purpose and you have to be able to be able to beat all kind of builds you build yourself up a strategy.

There is so much more to this game than just "rock, paper, scissors".
 

TurtleCannon

New member
Mar 6, 2012
21
0
0
I'm not going to get either of them. They look too similar to the first two for my likings. And seeing how I didn't care much for the 5th gen. games much that's no surprise.
 

Shnazaholic11

New member
Sep 17, 2012
2
0
0
TheKasp said:
disgruntledgamer said:
This game is getting criticized on other sites for being the same as the 1st Black and white. Not that it matters IMO you just use Water on Fire, Fire on Grass and Grass on Water and call it strategy. Sorry but Rack, Paper, Scissors strategy is not hard to master unless you're 12 or touched in the head. Using whatever the other person is weak against isn't hard to figure out.
But you get a strategy when you can choose from a giant roster of Pokes, all with different combinations of types (electro/bug, fire/fight, fire/bug and so on), all with several possible movesets and different stat and EV spreads (aka different speed, attack strength, defensive strength) and items. If you have to build a team of 6 where each one has to hold a purpose and you have to be able to be able to beat all kind of builds you build yourself up a strategy.

There is so much more to this game than just "rock, paper, scissors".
Stopped playing Pokemon after Gen 4 since I felt that repetition bug kick in. But I seriously think that arguments defending the depth to the strategy are bogus, because I got through just fine on Platinum, beating every trainer, the Elite 4, the Champion, and the Battle Frontier with only 6 mons that I slapped together with little thought on strategy and none for EV/IV training, all with damage based moves. And I will say that the effort even then wasn't worth it. Yeah I know there's online battle where that stuff is necessary but what's the point? To beat the part of the game that matters, that "Rock, Paper, Scissors" strategy is all you need. The depth is there, I won't deny it, but it's largely unnecessary for the core game.

Personally, I find the battle system to be dull ,lifeless, and outdated. And there's just no point for me to invest enough time to create "proper" team builds for online battle when there is no foreseeable reward for it. To me, Pokemon is just a pointless grind-feast with anemic personality and charm. There is no point to it and if there is one, I don't see it and it's definitely not worth it.

In other words, I'll be avoiding this one as I did it's predecessor.
 

disgruntledgamer

New member
Mar 6, 2012
905
0
0
TheKasp said:
disgruntledgamer said:
This game is getting criticized on other sites for being the same as the 1st Black and white. Not that it matters IMO you just use Water on Fire, Fire on Grass and Grass on Water and call it strategy. Sorry but Rack, Paper, Scissors strategy is not hard to master unless you're 12 or touched in the head. Using whatever the other person is weak against isn't hard to figure out.
But you get a strategy when you can choose from a giant roster of Pokes, all with different combinations of types (electro/bug, fire/fight, fire/bug and so on), all with several possible movesets and different stat and EV spreads (aka different speed, attack strength, defensive strength) and items. If you have to build a team of 6 where each one has to hold a purpose and you have to be able to be able to beat all kind of builds you build yourself up a strategy.

There is so much more to this game than just "rock, paper, scissors".
Nope sorry you're wrong even when you pick your roster your still using the same Rock, Paper, Scissors strategy, your just hoping yours matches his nicely which is luck, yes you could play it safe and pick a broad roster but it still boils down to using whatever the other person is weak against which is the simplest type of strategy to the point where most wouldn't even consider it strategy.
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
I wasn't excited for this and pretty much seemes like I was right not to be. Though to be fair I don't liek it because it feels too much like nintendo and gf are just caving in to fan whining that they didn't like the idea of starting fresh. And it feels llike they made it too easily and added unecessary gym leaders.
 

The Ubermensch

New member
Mar 6, 2012
345
0
0
arc1991 said:
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
I'll get it, cause god damn, fuck you statistics! You drive me to battle! ...EV and IV *shudder*

But one thing, I want my leading pokemon to follow me around like in heartgold/soulsilver/Yellow

Nintendo; why isn't that a staple of the franchise yet!?!

My Gardevoir should not be confined to a damn pokeball

Neither should my Ponyta
Agreed, even if it is only the starter Pokemon that can follow you, it should be kept that way!

It's one of the main reasons i keep going back to SS.
... Who the fack wants a samurott following them around everywhere? gen 5 starters suck dick man.

I want my Gardevoir, Rapidash (Twilight) or Zebrastrika (Zecora) to follow me everywhere

Anything less will incur all of my fan boy rage... and based on the fandoms I'm in I apparantly have a lot
 

Navvan

New member
Feb 3, 2011
560
0
0
disgruntledgamer said:
TheKasp said:
disgruntledgamer said:
This game is getting criticized on other sites for being the same as the 1st Black and white. Not that it matters IMO you just use Water on Fire, Fire on Grass and Grass on Water and call it strategy. Sorry but Rack, Paper, Scissors strategy is not hard to master unless you're 12 or touched in the head. Using whatever the other person is weak against isn't hard to figure out.
But you get a strategy when you can choose from a giant roster of Pokes, all with different combinations of types (electro/bug, fire/fight, fire/bug and so on), all with several possible movesets and different stat and EV spreads (aka different speed, attack strength, defensive strength) and items. If you have to build a team of 6 where each one has to hold a purpose and you have to be able to be able to beat all kind of builds you build yourself up a strategy.

There is so much more to this game than just "rock, paper, scissors".
Nope sorry you're wrong even when you pick your roster your still using the same Rock, Paper, Scissors strategy, your just hoping yours matches his nicely which is luck, yes you could play it safe and pick a broad roster but it still boils down to using whatever the other person is weak against which is the simplest type of strategy to the point where most wouldn't even consider it strategy.
The single player aspect of the game is entirely beatable with "rock paper scissor" strategy. It is easily beatable without any strategy. Go into any sort of competitive environment with that as you're only aim and you're not going to have a good time.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
Capitano Segnaposto said:
DustlessDragoon said:
Black and White are still the only generation I haven't finished but I may give it another go with this.
Same, however I just have had a lot of other games to play instead. I need to sit down and beat those last few gym leaders and finish off the Elite Four.
Elite 4 isn't the end in this one >_>.

I mean I guess they basically are, but they aren't.

...is this a spoiler? I want to tag it but it doesn't feel like a spoiler.

Roroshi14 said:
Black and White were the first game that I played competitively. And mastered. So I am so psyched for Black 2! FINALLY I CAN CATCH AN EEVEE AND GROWLITHE!!!! Woo!
Want to be pokemon buddies? :) I'm going to get it when it launches.

Navvan said:
The single player aspect of the game is entirely beatable with "rock paper scissor" strategy. It is easily beatable without any strategy. Go into any sort of competitive environment with that as you're only aim and you're not going to have a good time.
I dunno if you like to do this so if you do just ignore me.

BUT if these kind of people annoy you I would suggest not trying to debate with folks who have an agenda. Their name is literally "disgruntled" and they are being hyperbolic, I'd save your time <.<.

Plenty of valid complaints about Pokemon to be had, if they can't be bothered to pick ANY of them then others shouldn't need to explain it to them.
 

Buizel91

Autobot
Aug 25, 2008
5,265
0
0
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
arc1991 said:
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
I'll get it, cause god damn, fuck you statistics! You drive me to battle! ...EV and IV *shudder*

But one thing, I want my leading pokemon to follow me around like in heartgold/soulsilver/Yellow

Nintendo; why isn't that a staple of the franchise yet!?!

My Gardevoir should not be confined to a damn pokeball

Neither should my Ponyta
Agreed, even if it is only the starter Pokemon that can follow you, it should be kept that way!

It's one of the main reasons i keep going back to SS.
... Who the fack wants a samurott following them around everywhere? gen 5 starters suck dick man.

I want my Gardevoir, Rapidash (Twilight) or Zebrastrika (Zecora) to follow me everywhere

Anything less will incur all of my fan boy rage... and based on the fandoms I'm in I apparantly have a lot
The Gen 5 starters are fine, the weakest design out of them is the Tepig line. And personally, i'd love a Samurott following me, a Sea Lion with swords...what's so wrong about that? ;D
 

Sarah LeBoeuf

New member
Apr 28, 2011
2,084
0
0
disgruntledgamer said:
Nope sorry you're wrong even when you pick your roster your still using the same Rock, Paper, Scissors strategy, your just hoping yours matches his nicely which is luck, yes you could play it safe and pick a broad roster but it still boils down to using whatever the other person is weak against which is the simplest type of strategy to the point where most wouldn't even consider it strategy.
This is applieable to every game that has SP. While you can apply tactic or strategy it can also be simply "bumrushed", overrun the enemy by building more shit or just hardcounter his setup. Because the AI sucks (always) and is only capable of countering your decisions if the game limits you. On the other hand, if the designer apply limitations to the AI (like themed Gyms) they fuck any kind of strategy you might want to use and let you roll with "Excadrill pracitcally dominates everything the game throws at you. Always". Though there is no ground to discuss the reasoning behind those limitations: The Pokemon SP is basically just aimed at kids - it is obvious since they 'hide' everything that makes the game complex from any viewer who does not want to start with this things.

Give me any game you might find "oh so strategic" where you play against AI and I find you the easiest way to exploit weaknesses of the AI and limitations set up by developers.

But since we are talking about strategic possibilietes we should include the only area where different strategies and decisions actually do count: Multiplayer.
 

The Ubermensch

New member
Mar 6, 2012
345
0
0
arc1991 said:
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
arc1991 said:
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
I'll get it, cause god damn, fuck you statistics! You drive me to battle! ...EV and IV *shudder*

But one thing, I want my leading pokemon to follow me around like in heartgold/soulsilver/Yellow

Nintendo; why isn't that a staple of the franchise yet!?!

My Gardevoir should not be confined to a damn pokeball

Neither should my Ponyta
Agreed, even if it is only the starter Pokemon that can follow you, it should be kept that way!

It's one of the main reasons i keep going back to SS.
... Who the fack wants a samurott following them around everywhere? gen 5 starters suck dick man.

I want my Gardevoir, Rapidash (Twilight) or Zebrastrika (Zecora) to follow me everywhere

Anything less will incur all of my fan boy rage... and based on the fandoms I'm in I apparantly have a lot
The Gen 5 starters are fine, the weakest design out of them is the Tepig line. And personally, i'd love a Samurott following me, a Sea Lion with swords...what's so wrong about that? ;D
We all know Gen II has the best starting pokemon

Ok, well, I know. I had a Feraligatr, and it was the pokemon game I brainwashed myself on. I named him "Todonumega lord".

Anyway; off track. If we think "Oh, I'll be OK with just the starter pokemon" then that's all we'll get. Where as ALL THE POKEMON, everyone can choose. Think of someone else for a change!
 

minuialear

New member
Jun 15, 2010
237
0
0
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
Anyway; off track. If we think "Oh, I'll be OK with just the starter pokemon" then that's all we'll get. Where as ALL THE POKEMON, everyone can choose. Think of someone else for a change!
As if the poster has any direct control over which it ends up being...?

OT: Dunno if this is worth buying since I already have Black, but it sounds like it has enough for those who haven't come to the current generation yet.
 

The Ubermensch

New member
Mar 6, 2012
345
0
0
minuialear said:
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
Anyway; off track. If we think "Oh, I'll be OK with just the starter pokemon" then that's all we'll get. Where as ALL THE POKEMON, everyone can choose. Think of someone else for a change!
As if the poster has any direct control over which it ends up being...?

OT: Dunno if this is worth buying since I already have Black, but it sounds like it has enough for those who haven't come to the current generation yet.
>Forgetting Mass Effect 3 fiasco

When anon is loud enough...

>Implying that Pokemon isn't digital crack and you must have all the games.

I've decided this game I'm going to EV train... Its gonna hurt so much

Navvan said:
disgruntledgamer said:
TheKasp said:
disgruntledgamer said:
This game is getting criticized on other sites for being the same as the 1st Black and white. Not that it matters IMO you just use Water on Fire, Fire on Grass and Grass on Water and call it strategy. Sorry but Rack, Paper, Scissors strategy is not hard to master unless you're 12 or touched in the head. Using whatever the other person is weak against isn't hard to figure out.
But you get a strategy when you can choose from a giant roster of Pokes, all with different combinations of types (electro/bug, fire/fight, fire/bug and so on), all with several possible movesets and different stat and EV spreads (aka different speed, attack strength, defensive strength) and items. If you have to build a team of 6 where each one has to hold a purpose and you have to be able to be able to beat all kind of builds you build yourself up a strategy.

There is so much more to this game than just "rock, paper, scissors".
Nope sorry you're wrong even when you pick your roster your still using the same Rock, Paper, Scissors strategy, your just hoping yours matches his nicely which is luck, yes you could play it safe and pick a broad roster but it still boils down to using whatever the other person is weak against which is the simplest type of strategy to the point where most wouldn't even consider it strategy.
The single player aspect of the game is entirely beatable with "rock paper scissor" strategy. It is easily beatable without any strategy. Go into any sort of competitive environment with that as you're only aim and you're not going to have a good time.
Umbreon (Dark[I was super envious, but my leafeon kicks ass]) vs Gardevoir (Psychic[weak to dark])

U:Dark pulse - super effective - G health down to red
G:Double team -evasiveness increased
U:Bite - Miss
G:Double team - Evasiveness increased
U:Quick attack - Miss
G:psychic (Just to make him think I was a noob)
U:Shadow Ball - Miss
G:THUNDER BOLT - Critical hit - U down to yellow/Paralysed
U:paralysed, It can't move!
G:Magic leaf - U has fainted
me: I FUCKED YOU SHIT *****, OH YEAH, I AM THE POKEMON MASTER MOTHER FUCKER. I'mma lend you my ditto so I can fuck all ya pokemon

There is a poker aspect to the game as well. Rock doesn't beat titanium diamond coated scissors
 

Sarah LeBoeuf

New member
Apr 28, 2011
2,084
0
0
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
arc1991 said:
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
arc1991 said:
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
I'll get it, cause god damn, fuck you statistics! You drive me to battle! ...EV and IV *shudder*

But one thing, I want my leading pokemon to follow me around like in heartgold/soulsilver/Yellow

Nintendo; why isn't that a staple of the franchise yet!?!

My Gardevoir should not be confined to a damn pokeball

Neither should my Ponyta
Agreed, even if it is only the starter Pokemon that can follow you, it should be kept that way!

It's one of the main reasons i keep going back to SS.
... Who the fack wants a samurott following them around everywhere? gen 5 starters suck dick man.

I want my Gardevoir, Rapidash (Twilight) or Zebrastrika (Zecora) to follow me everywhere

Anything less will incur all of my fan boy rage... and based on the fandoms I'm in I apparantly have a lot
The Gen 5 starters are fine, the weakest design out of them is the Tepig line. And personally, i'd love a Samurott following me, a Sea Lion with swords...what's so wrong about that? ;D
We all know Gen II has the best starting pokemon

Ok, well, I know. I had a Feraligatr, and it was the pokemon game I brainwashed myself on. I named him "Todonumega lord".

Anyway; off track. If we think "Oh, I'll be OK with just the starter pokemon" then that's all we'll get. Where as ALL THE POKEMON, everyone can choose. Think of someone else for a change!
god no, gen 4
of fact that the whole gen was a awesome but broken mess of super powered pokemon almost all of the pokemon in that regieon you could play and do good-to-awesome with with ,and that fact that infernape ended up being insanely powerful, aswell as grass starter in its own right
 

The White Hunter

Basment Abomination
Oct 19, 2011
3,888
0
0
chozo_hybrid said:
I'm glad to see they are starting to make use of the systems graphical capabilities, aside from Stadium etc is this the first main Pokemon game to have 3d graphics in it? I'm curious, I don't play them but I used to, from red up to silver.
Diamond and Pearl had 3D stuff in them, progressively more of it as the games have gone on.

OT: Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaay I want now : DD
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
arc1991 said:
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
I'll get it, cause god damn, fuck you statistics! You drive me to battle! ...EV and IV *shudder*

But one thing, I want my leading pokemon to follow me around like in heartgold/soulsilver/Yellow

Nintendo; why isn't that a staple of the franchise yet!?!

My Gardevoir should not be confined to a damn pokeball

Neither should my Ponyta
Agreed, even if it is only the starter Pokemon that can follow you, it should be kept that way!

It's one of the main reasons i keep going back to SS.
... Who the fack wants a samurott following them around everywhere? gen 5 starters suck dick man.

I want my Gardevoir, Rapidash (Twilight) or Zebrastrika (Zecora) to follow me everywhere

Anything less will incur all of my fan boy rage... and based on the fandoms I'm in I apparantly have a lot
To be fair pretty much every starter sucks from every gen.
 

minuialear

New member
Jun 15, 2010
237
0
0
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
minuialear said:
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
Anyway; off track. If we think "Oh, I'll be OK with just the starter pokemon" then that's all we'll get. Where as ALL THE POKEMON, everyone can choose. Think of someone else for a change!
As if the poster has any direct control over which it ends up being...?

OT: Dunno if this is worth buying since I already have Black, but it sounds like it has enough for those who haven't come to the current generation yet.
>Forgetting Mass Effect 3 fiasco

When anon is loud enough...
>Forgetting that it wasn't one poster who directly influenced that, but a multitude of posters protesting that it be done...
 

The Ubermensch

New member
Mar 6, 2012
345
0
0
minuialear said:
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
minuialear said:
Sargent Hoofbeat said:
Anyway; off track. If we think "Oh, I'll be OK with just the starter pokemon" then that's all we'll get. Where as ALL THE POKEMON, everyone can choose. Think of someone else for a change!
As if the poster has any direct control over which it ends up being...?

OT: Dunno if this is worth buying since I already have Black, but it sounds like it has enough for those who haven't come to the current generation yet.
>Forgetting Mass Effect 3 fiasco

When anon is loud enough...
>Forgetting that it wasn't one poster who directly influenced that, but a multitude of posters protesting that it be done...
>Not realising I'm an insurrectionist

COME MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS, FOR OUR POKEMON