AgentDarkmoon said:
I read articles about this earlier. He had a weapon (regardless of the fact that it was a sharp piece of wood) and was threatening TO KILL both teachers and the police. I'd say that pepper spray was very much justified. I'd even say tazering would be acceptable- when someone is angry, has a weapon, and is threatening to kill you, you should not take chances, regardless of their age or size.
Also, this isn't the first time that the kid had the police called on him at school, nor the second, if articles are to be believed.
Well a tazer is a bit far considering they are lethal enough to kill children, adult women and people with heart problems.
I think the child's actions warranted the use of police spray, yes the police could have talked him down but the failure of this would cause more aggression. Just because the kid gets pissed off doesn't justify a violent rampage, the mother says it s often when he has a structured event then has free time then goes back to a structured event that he gets angry. Well its pretty simple to see that hes got angry because he didn't feel like doing work.
Its hard to see him posing much of a threat, but he did have a weapon and it is probably police protocol to end the situation as quickly as possible. The police told him to drop the weapon, he didn't, the police acted accordingly. I think the mother is complaining about the "excessive" use of police force on her son, but if there was another child on a violent rampage and was about to kill her son, she would want it resolved as quickly as possible. But due to her complaints the first time, her son would die because the police tried to talk down his assailant.
I would think there is a police protocol for matters like this, the first two times the police were able to talk down the child because he wasn't able to kill anyone in the imminent area (at least to my knowledge) But this time the police acted because I think they were trained to prevent any injury as quickly as possible in a poor hostage type situations such as this.
Ah well, this seems to me like on of those grey areas were some people agree and others don't and you can't really demonize or victimize anybody in this situation without looking unfair. Example: You try to make the child a victim, and you have to deal with the fact he went on a violent rampage. You try to make him a demon, and you have to remember he is only 8. You try to victimize the police, its the freaking police. You try to demonize the police and its frivolous because the police were doing what they should be doing.