1. To give a name or title to.Squidbulb said:That's not what entitled means.Kinguendo said:What are you talking about? I am a Gamer and I have never had a game named after me, but now that you have mentioned it... I SHOULD have a game named after me!
I don't see how any of that applies to anything but the bethesda series, and even then only tangentially.LiquidSolstice said:I don't get why everyone thinks this is just in response to the ME3 bullshit. Want to see entitlement in action? Look at any old MW2 or Black Ops PC thread you can find.
I promise you you'll find numerous complaints from people about not having dedicated servers or modding tools. They were never promised them, nor were they told to expect them. But they felt entitled to them.
I hate hate HATE how this sounds like flamebait, but from every observation I've ever made, this "self-entitlement" thing only occurs to PC gamers. I can't remember the last time I met one of my console-owning friends and discussed how sad it was that we didn't have dedicated servers or mods.
It of course can't be for any other reason than the publisher hating you and wanting to extract money from you. Not handing you a sandbox to fuck around with their work is the ultimate disservice, apparently. And because of this "we deserve mods" mentality, they also feel entitled to any form of DLC, claiming that "they could have made it themselves if you had given them the chance".
I'll say this again; I don't wish to offend any PC gamers and what I've noticed may not apply to you indivudually, so don't take it personally. But for people who enjoy video games and are getting tired of the drama and politics, I genuinely feel that console gaming makes for a far more pleasant experience.
I have you specific examples of MW2 and Black Ops and you don't think it applies?Darkcerb said:I don't see how any of that applies to anything but the bethesda series, and even then only tangentially.
Wait....what?I've seen people complain they didn't get there moneys worth from dlc but never that they need to pay for it see horse armor...in fact everything but shivering isles.
Oh? You've met every single one of us in the XBL community? Damn, I wish I had all the time that you did. Using that same logic (since we're generalizing), I'll just go ahead and say that the PC gaming community is the worst and most arrogant gaming collective I've ever encountered in all MY time of gaming. That's fair, isn't it?And even if console gamers didn't complain incessently that pc gamers get anything more then they do the community especially the xbox live community is the worst of any gaming collective I've ever encountered in 20 years of gaming.
Calm down junior, how about you re-read your post that implies the whole of pc gaming community is how you say it is.LiquidSolstice said:I have you specific examples of MW2 and Black Ops and you don't think it applies?Darkcerb said:I don't see how any of that applies to anything but the bethesda series, and even then only tangentially.
Wait....what?I've seen people complain they didn't get there moneys worth from dlc but never that they need to pay for it see horse armor...in fact everything but shivering isles.
Oh? You've met every single one of us in the XBL community? Damn, I wish I had all the time that you did. Using that same logic (since we're generalizing), I'll just go ahead and say that the PC gaming community is the worst and most arrogant gaming collective I've ever encountered in all MY time of gaming. That's fair, isn't it?And even if console gamers didn't complain incessently that pc gamers get anything more then they do the community especially the xbox live community is the worst of any gaming collective I've ever encountered in 20 years of gaming.
Knock knock, you play with people on the internet. It's the fricking internet. No shit there will be assholes on the internet, ergo, of course there will be assholes on whatever gaming medium you choose. You know what genuine issue I take with the majority of PC gamers? The essence of the game itself appears to be lost in complaints. I genuinely feel that as a console gamer, I'm able to appreciate the work put into the games I play because I know how far gaming has progressed, and rather than be a political activist about it, I sit down, shut up, and I enjoy it.
Oh no, you don't get to use that against me because you've done the exact same thing to the console community. Why have different rules?Darkcerb said:Calm down junior, how about you re-read your post that implies the whole of pc gaming community is how you say it is.
And I don't have to know that in every game of TF2 I'll meet complete dickheads, ergo it's alright for me to decide all PC gamers are dickheads. I don't need to know every single one of them either, right? Do you have a point?And no it's not a few bad apples as you'd find in any online endeavor on xbox live it's the majority, I don't have to meet every single one of them to know that in every game of halo2-3 gears(all) there are arsehats.
That fucking sucks for you. You purchased it. You experienced it. Deal with it. You don't go bitching to the director after a movie you paid to see wasn't want you wanted, right?If you want to sit and eat crap go for it, me I complain when I feel I haven't got my moneys worth
When I say it's a content director's right to create their content how they wish, I am not protecting them.and I say how I feel any given game could be improved from my point of view. Nothing ever improved without criticism and the developers don't need protecting they're big boys now and they can handle it.
Yes, because no one ever bitches about DLC. Do you live under a rock?People didn't complain that they had to pay money for content. At least in bethesda games cases.
Oh yes it does. PC games are known for having mod tools. So when a game comes out and doesn't offer them, people are pissed off and feel entitled to said mod tools. That is called entitlement.And no it doesn't relate when you imply a series that's never had modding tools suddenly...doesn't
My post was concerning how this "entitlement" thing has been around a lot longer than all the people bitching about ME3.did you even read your post what exactly was your point? that it should?
Seeing as Valve is the master at copying their own games, changing a few textures, and reselling them, I guess you're right.I agree but then I feel like most company's could do alot worse then copying valve.
I agree that ME3 is not a case of too much self-entitlement.Blade_125 said:snip
Except when you read a book and decide the ending didn't match what you expect you don't demand a better one replace it. You also don't petition the publishers not to sell it at Barnes and Noble for whatever bullshit reason you have. Gamers are one of the worst consumers for their own false entitlement. As if the consumer has ever had any sway in deciding what distribution will be used other than which is used most or what would.ResonanceSD said:For the most part, no. The concerns are legitimate. People see gamers acting like consumers of any other product, and ddcide that they're all self-entitled little twerps.
Go read up on Sherlock Holmes.The Unworthy Gentleman said:Except when you read a book and decide the ending didn't match what you expect you don't demand a better one replace it. You also don't petition the publishers not to sell it at Barnes and Noble for whatever bullshit reason you have. Gamers are one of the worst consumers for their own false entitlement. As if the consumer has ever had any sway in deciding what distribution will be used other than which is used most or what would.ResonanceSD said:For the most part, no. The concerns are legitimate. People see gamers acting like consumers of any other product, and ddcide that they're all self-entitled little twerps.
If you have to have every little thing pertaining to your hobby suit your personal desires then you're a fucking moron.