loc978 said:
I'm honestly not seeing a whole lot of parallels to hipsters as I understand them in that article. Dandies appeared to be much more on the order of affecting current high fashion to their own middle station, while hipsters affect the fashions and sensibilities of yesteryear to their own tastes while looking down on others for not being retro or underground enough. That's really quite dissimilar, not just in the content of its idiosyncrasies, but also the culture from which it springs.
Please, you're giving too much undue credit to hipsters. With your definition of hipsters, they're pretty much the (figuratively) retarded offspring of hippies, who rejected corporate something something and only shopped at thrift stores at hopes of saving the world or local businesses or something (lol). I forget.
Hipsters on the other hand are shallow pseudo-intellectuals who have failed to form an identity, so they gather like flies on anything that nobody does, just for the sake of appearing to be unique. Hey, I'm talking about the common populace here, not the individual. It's hard finding people that are worth spending time with.