essentially this: Pansexuality (also referred to as pans), or omnisexuality is a sexual orientation, characterized by the potential for aesthetic attraction, romantic love, or sexual desire towards people, regardless of their gender identity or biological sex...w-Jinksy said:just out of curiosity what is pansexual?smurf_you said:personally I think that would be a bit hypocritical of me, being pansexual and all.... I've also been trying to get a gay friend of mine out of the closet for almost a year now... I blame his parents, they actually kicked him out of the house for it T.T
Edit: also two cute guys making out is HOT![]()
I've got nothing against people that are gay (unless their acting stupid) as a person, but I don't aprove of sex between 2 guys or 2 girls. Reason for me is that it's not meant to be done that way, basic scientific fact is that to reproduce you need a male and female, so to do it any other way means theres something not right upstairs, I see it as a possible mental illness. Doesn't mean I think less of them as a person and if you don't agree with my view then fair enough but no-one can say its natural when our bodies are made one way and their doing it the opposite. It's just not meant to be.UnwishedGunz said:I'm not homophobic, i have 2 gay friends and a gay sister.
but i know a few people who are, its stupid because they hate man on man stuff but they all approve on lesbian sex, which is why i brought up this subject
i wanna know REAL reason why people might be homophobic or not, cause all my friends are stupid.
Precisely, their insecure about their sexual orientation and they insult those that don't agree with them.Island said:I fully agree, what if anything is scary about gay people? I don't think homophobia really exists, its more of an insulting thing people say about people that dislike homosexuality.
Biologically it is just as correct as being Heterosexual. A man sticking his shwing in the anus of another man is no different in the act than from a man doing it to a woman, simply without the breasts and vagina. If it weren't, it wouldn't work as easily (or at all) as it does for a decent size of the world's population.Loop Stricken said:No, but it's still wrong.
Not morally; biologically. It's incorrect. I don't have a problem with it, it's just not cricket.
Reminds me of somebody telling a gay man "The parts don't fit", to which he responds: "As a gay man let me assure you, the parts do fit. However your view that they do not has me curious and I must ask..."ShadowsofHope said:Biologically it is just as correct as being Heterosexual. A man sticking his shwing in the anus of another man is no different in the act than from a man doing it to a woman, simply without the breasts and vagina. If it weren't, it wouldn't work as easily (or at all) as it does for a decent size of the world's population.Loop Stricken said:No, but it's still wrong.
Not morally; biologically. It's incorrect. I don't have a problem with it, it's just not cricket.
Now if you are stating from an entirely reproductive sense, then no.. it doesn't work that way.
but in all seriousness because somebody would call me out on it, no I do not hate homosexuals as well... I have no reason to hate it, nobody has tried to shove it down my throat (pun not intended).homo- which means same for example; homozygous (which means 2 of the same chromosomes)
and phobic which means irrational fear for example; arachnophobia (scared of arachnids {spiders and I'm not but scorpions too?})