Warcraft 2. More intuitive than Warcraft 1, better story, the lore hadn't been destroyed yet, and it hadn't become Herocraft either.squballs1234 said:what was your favorite time period in Warcraft?
actually its 41 points for 85 levels. one point every 2 levels at odd numbered levels such as 11, 13, 15, etc.Macheteswordgun said:That and looked at all the fourms for the other classes *have an 80 lock warrior and rouge* and to me at least looks like there talking all the skill out of it all the passives and only 31 skill points per 85 lvls W.T.F.jasoncyrus said:Have you played the beta?Macheteswordgun said:Vanalla wow BC second Wrath is ok cata looks to be shit honestly
"lfm icc10 1,203,446,403,645gs+ only"Protocol95 said:Wrath. Would've had more fun if 1337 raiders didn't ruin the endgame for me though.
Slightly offtopic, but how was the lore ruined exactly, and what does "Herocraft" even mean?Desaari said:Warcraft 2. More intuitive than Warcraft 1, better story, the lore hadn't been destroyed yet, and it hadn't become Herocraft either.squballs1234 said:what was your favorite time period in Warcraft?
If only Warcraft 3 was to Warcraft 2 what Starcraft 2 is to Starcraft.
I can only speak for myself, but some of the retconning that goes into the story in WoW does tend to set some people on edge.Karathos said:Slightly offtopic, but how was the lore ruined exactly, and what does "Herocraft" even mean?Desaari said:Warcraft 2. More intuitive than Warcraft 1, better story, the lore hadn't been destroyed yet, and it hadn't become Herocraft either.squballs1234 said:what was your favorite time period in Warcraft?
If only Warcraft 3 was to Warcraft 2 what Starcraft 2 is to Starcraft.
Burning Crusade for me. The Warcraft 2 expansion campaigns were my favorites, and it was awesome seeing Khadgar and the old fighting locations from a one-person perspective (alá third-person-game, I mean)
I see your point, I suppose.Diddy_Mao said:I can only speak for myself, but some of the retconning that goes into the story in WoW does tend to set some people on edge.Karathos said:Slightly offtopic, but how was the lore ruined exactly, and what does "Herocraft" even mean?Desaari said:Warcraft 2. More intuitive than Warcraft 1, better story, the lore hadn't been destroyed yet, and it hadn't become Herocraft either.squballs1234 said:what was your favorite time period in Warcraft?
If only Warcraft 3 was to Warcraft 2 what Starcraft 2 is to Starcraft.
Burning Crusade for me. The Warcraft 2 expansion campaigns were my favorites, and it was awesome seeing Khadgar and the old fighting locations from a one-person perspective (alá third-person-game, I mean)
One of the most notable examples being the Draenei being an uncorrupted offshoot of the Eredar that had been living on Draenor before the Burning Legion corrupted the Orcs.
Personally I have to admit I'm a little peeved at their current lore twisting by including Mages as a playable class for the Night Elves. It completely flies in the face of everything the Night Elves back story was based on.
I'm not even an Alliance player and that kinda ticks me off a bit.
OMG UR GS IZNT 5.7K U CANT COM 2 ICC CAUSE U NOOB LOL. GS MAEKS UR PENOR BIGGERGralian said:It feels like expansions killed the community, but maybe that's just exclusive to my server.
Don't even get me started on the fucking gearscore addon.
GS is simply something idiots use because they don't have the skills to actually play. All gearscore shows is that someone got lucky in loot rolls. Nothing more.Gralian said:It feels like expansions killed the community, but maybe that's just exclusive to my server.
Don't even get me started on the fucking gearscore addon.
OH GOD THERE WAS SO MUCH PURPLE.Vhite said:I vote for Burning Crusade era, I really liked classic dungeons because they were mostly non-linear but BC was really colorfull in ALL aspects of the game.