Poll: "Benevolent Sexism"...Wait, what?!

Recommended Videos

Ramzal

New member
Jun 24, 2011
414
0
0
Phasmal said:
Ramzal said:
Did you tell him "Knock it off" in those exact words? Because that's probably why he flipped if that's the case. Am I saying "OH IT'S YOUR FAULT!!"? No. But he was doing something he found to be socially acceptable and appropriate with no ill will towards you, and if you responded with a hostile "Knock it off!" then I can understand him being frustrated. It sucks when you're being nice and someone flips at you.

Oh the other hand if you told him that you've got it and he persisted and he became morose trying to take the bags from you, then yeah. I can get you being upset by that.
Nope, didn't use those exact words, back then I was trying to let him down gently.

But that's exactly my point. This guy had known me for many years, but as soon as he decided he wanted to date me, he started treating me like a delicate flower when anyone who's known me more than five minutes could tell I would absolutely hate that. Because that's what he thought women should like/be like, regardless of what the individual he was trying to impress (I guess) actually wanted.

So, yeah, that whole thing was dumb.

We should all be polite to strangers, and making a show of yourself trying to be a `gentleman` is often more to do with you than the other person. (General `you`).
I get where you are coming from. But a thing to understand is that sometimes when men do these things, it's not to insult or undermine as it is just as we are raised. My mother had raised me to handle more groceries than she does when we go shopping, even when I was a child. Her reasoning was that I am able bodied and a male who will someday have to be physically strong. Incredibly sexist and very manipulative which infuriated me but I had developed a different mentality of it. If I can by any means make someone's burden physically or mentally easier I would do it. Not all of us help women with tasks because we think they're weak. But if someone says "No thanks", that should be respected.

The whole "you women" thing is a rarer mindset in men than you would think. The guys who say things like that usually were put through a ringer by their mother or someone else who happened to be a female that gave them a bad experience. That mindset doesn't come from no where, it is either taught or drilled into one's head by abusive behavior. Still, he did cross a clear line when he said it and I don't blame you for being upset as you have every right to be. Just understand that many men are just... raised to be helpful to women and they're not trying to insult women by doing these gestures as for the majority they are taught to do these things by women.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
This seems like one of those "over there" problems. Problems that I can't seem to find anyone who has a personal experience with, but it totally happened to someone sometime.
 

The Lunatic

Princess
Jun 3, 2010
2,291
0
0
There's a notion which people are calling "Pussypass" these days. (It's a terrible name. Don't blame me, I didn't come up with it.)

Which essentially is the phenomenon in which women are get lighter sentences, or no sentences at all for the crimes they commit.

It seems perhaps to be born from the idea that women aren't as responsible for their own actions, and as such have mitigating factors that mean they're not due as much punishment in law as male offenders are.

It may also be cultural attitudes to typically consider males to be more violent and aggressive, and women to be the opposite, thus women committing crimes is sometimes seen as "Having misguided intentions".

It's rather hard to say if this falls into the category of "Benevolent sexism" or just discrimination against men. However, it's seemingly a well documented thing. I'm not sure if there's been any studies into it however.
 

ryderawsome

New member
Apr 23, 2009
138
0
0
Intention and observation play a key part in this. If it is only your intention to be nice then no its not sexism. If she does not like what you are doing, because the individual opinion of the woman in question really plays the biggest part of it, then it was an honest mistake. If you keep doing it after she asks you not to then that's sexism. If she flies off the handle the first time it happens she is probably on drugs.

Simple.
 

RobXSIQ

New member
Feb 22, 2015
18
0
0
Reasonable Atheist said:
So.... are we just goin to ignore the elephant in the room? You know the one, the sexual attraction elephant. I do kind thing for women because they are women, this is true. I do said kind things for women because i am sexually attracted to beautiful women. Yes that means I will step out of the way to let an attractive woman onto an elivator before me because she might smile at me if i do, and i do not let fat women on elivators before me because i dont care if they smile at me. Deal with it.

Next we will be claiming flirting is sexist.

Captcha: public good
i am becoming paranoid about captchas
Oh, well hell, I wouldn't put my pants on if not for sexual attraction. sort of the overriding trait of people is to do things in order to better situate ourselves for breeding..it has kept the species (all species) going due to that.
 

RobXSIQ

New member
Feb 22, 2015
18
0
0
its funny though if you put perspective on things.

over in the middle east, men throw acid in womens faces if she goes to school, or will kill her if she disgraces the family by kissing the wrong boy.

lets talk about the pig men here who will open a door for a woman.
heh


...1st world problems.
 

The Bucket

Senior Member
May 4, 2010
531
0
21
I always hold the door for women, but then let it go just as they're about to cross the threshold as a show of respect for their strength /joke

Edit:
RobXSIQ said:
its funny though if you put perspective on things.

over in the middle east, men throw acid in womens faces if she goes to school, or will kill her if she disgraces the family by kissing the wrong boy.

lets talk about the pig men here who will open a door for a woman.
heh


...1st world problems.
To be fair, you can say that about most things; in some countries people dont have enough food or water to live, and we're getting angry about poorly optimized PC ports and sub standard FPS.
 

Tsun Tzu

Feuer! Sperrfeuer! Los!
Legacy
Jul 19, 2010
1,620
83
33
Country
Free-Dom
The Rogue Wolf said:
Okay, I'm seeing a sort of trend here with other men saying "well, great, now I can't even hold a door open for a woman".

Um, no.

You can hold a door open for anybody. You can stop at the side of the road during a rainy night to help anybody with a flat tire. You can carry a heavy bag for anyone who needs the help. But here's the thing: If you do those things for a woman because you think "a woman can't do that herself", then that's sexist. If you do those things for a woman because you think "a woman shouldn't have to stoop to doing that", that's also sexist.

And if a woman believes that you did something for her because you're a man, and are therefore sexist? Well, guess what: She's sexist. She's no more a member of some overarching, misandric "matriarchy" than you are a member of a "patriarchy"; she's just a sexist asshole. Adjust accordingly.


Nail on the head, right there.


the December King said:
EDIT: Of course we must bear in mind that I am from Canada, where overt politeness is pumped into several of our local water supplies.
I knew that tonic water would come back to haunt me.

Granted, its taste was haunting enough, but the after effects have lasted for decades.

As for opening doors in general... I'll do it for everyone, depending on, as has been mentioned, proximity.

Which has the potential to suck, massively, if you misjudge or the person in question decides that right at that moment would be a perfect time to reach into their bag/answer a call/move at the pace of a partially frozen snail, so you're kind of left standing there feeling like a total tool for doing the automatic kind thing.
 

HankyPanky

New member
Jan 29, 2015
22
0
0
I'd argue there is benevolent sexism, just not that type of behavior. I'd say benevolent sexism is what white knights do: infantilize women and treat them as perfect, uncorruptable angels.
 

cleric of the order

New member
Sep 13, 2010
546
0
0
This isn't surprising
sexism, originally is the attribution and or acknowledgement of sex traits.
Thus showing that sort of kindness to a lady is sexist
but it not chauvinistic, which is the words all of you want
sexism has overtaken sexual-chauvinistic oddly enough just the latter had.
 

Cid Silverwing

Paladin of The Light
Jul 27, 2008
3,133
0
0
This COULD have happened to me.

A month or two back I was out to see The Battle of The Five Armies at the cinema. While on the ferry rides to and from the city I noticed nobody wanted to keep the bigass door to the second-floor salon open, so I dutifully stepped in and did my part. The most I got was a bemused "You a door guard or somethin'?" from some presumably elderly gentleman.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
20,163
4,516
118
Cid Silverwing said:
This COULD have happened to me.

A month or two back I was out to see The Battle of The Five Armies at the cinema. While on the ferry rides to and from the city I noticed nobody wanted to keep the bigass door to the second-floor salon open, so I dutifully stepped in and did my part. The most I got was a bemused "You a door guard or somethin'?" from some presumably elderly gentleman.
Eh, you can't do anything nowdays without elderly gentlemen giving you bemused comments. So unfair.
 

Cid Silverwing

Paladin of The Light
Jul 27, 2008
3,133
0
0
thaluikhain said:
Eh, you can't do anything nowdays without elderly gentlemen giving you bemused comments. So unfair.
I didn't see if the guy actually was as old as he sounded like. Regardless it was a pretty positive remark to hear, as opposed to the stereotypical "whippersnapper" bullshit I'm so used to hearing others getting exposed to.
 

Trippy Turtle

Elite Member
May 10, 2010
2,119
2
43
Doing it just because they are a girl is pretty stupid but hey. If they get a door held open who are they to complain? Its not sexism either way. Sexism is discrimination based on gender. Doing something because of someones gender is not inherently sexist or a bad thing.
I treat both genders equally. I'd hold a door open for a guy just as often as I would for a girl. I'd slam it in their faces if I didn't like them regardless of gender. Even while growing up the whole 'ladies first' thing annoyed me. And in a sinking ship I'd save a guy that I liked or a guy that was easier to help over some random girl any day. Same for a girl I liked or was easier to help.

On a semi unrelated note, I was brought up being told to be a gentleman and polite to girls and such. And was/will be to any girls I go out with. However I'd definitely be less willing to have someone as a girlfriend if she expected to be treated like that just because shes a girl.
 

Mikeybb

Nunc est Durandum
Aug 19, 2014
862
0
0
I cannot vote as when there's someone behind me and I spot them, I hold the door.
Gender and age are irellevant in this decision.
It's a matter of courtesy, primary concern being that the door doesn't slam shut on their face as I walk away.
 

persephone

Poisoned by Pomegranates
May 2, 2012
165
0
0
I think benevolent sexism is a thing -- but only in some conditions. If someone *insists* on treating someone in a certain way even if she doesn't want it, that's bad. If they're okay with not doing so, but want to offer, that's just fine.

And here's the difficult bit: it's not really the action, but the intentions behind the action. Pulling someone's seat out can be either a genuine gesture of kindness or a demeaning declaration of status. The problem that pops up is when people start interpreting one as the other, either because of cultural coding or because of bad past experiences.

Is there an easy solution to that? No. No there's not.

Incidentally, I hold doors open for everyone; it's what my father taught me to do. I am, by the way, a woman. I got some surprised looks in college when I started holding doors open for men and women alike, but no one was ever offended, and they always accepted gratefully and gracefully.

Another interesting story, semi-related. I used to be sensitive to cursing (nowadays I swear like a sailor, though; age has mellowed me out quite a bit), and I once mentioned to my grandmother that all of my friends (basically all of whom were guys) always cursed around me and it annoyed me. She then gave me the most astonishing advice: that I should inform them that I was a lady, and they were not to do such things in a lady's presence!

I barely managed to keep my various reaction to this idea in until I was out of my grandmother's presence (she wouldn't have liked any of them). My first reaction was, "I am NOT a lady!" I realized then that I found the idea of being a lady very offensive. I'd known on some level I was just one of the guys, but this was the day it really sunk in. My male friends weren't being crass around me, they were just being themselves. And that was a far greater compliment, to me, than them watching their language to protect my delicate lady-ears or whatever. I realized that my problem wasn't them, but that I myself was just being far too uptight.
 

Riot3000

New member
Oct 7, 2013
220
0
0
Why does everytime benevolent sexism comes up it this hold doors open crap that misses the forest of the trees.

I would go into because Dizzy summed it up well and I don't feel like a wall of text.

The in my opinion yes benevolent sexism is real and is more prevasive than malevolent because benevolent can conceal itself way better because of its machinations. I think it has invaded even suppose feminist places and discussion which has caused me to avoid them or just grow irksome with them for a time.

The whole to be or not be a gentlemen aspect of this does not really do this conversation the justice it so rarely gets.
 

Ieyke

New member
Jul 24, 2008
1,402
0
0
Yea, they can go and fuck off.

Regardless of if I do it just for women or not, if I hold open a door for a girl and she takes offense, then that just highlights that I want nothing to do with her.

Because if I do something nice for a woman and can't be bothered to do the same for a guy, it doesn't really matter. I'm still being nice.
The world should NOT prefer that I be apathetic to all instead of benevolent towards some.

Do I do it because I think they're weak?
No.

Do I think they're weak?
I think (know) they're less physically powerful than men on average, and very probably weaker than me specifically (most men are too), but no, I don't assume they're actually weak.

Why do I do it?
I don't always. I do it because it's convenient and it's someone I want to be nice to, and that's pretty much true of anyone, but more so women.
Because....I like women. I tend to get along with them better than guys just in general. Most of my closest friends are women.
For all I know, it could be because of the whole "women are only bitches to other women" thing, which means I always get their pleasant side, whereas a guy who's an asshole is usually just an asshole to everyone.... Or not. I'm told that's a thing. I dunno. Don't really care either.

Point is, if I hold open a damn door for you, don't be a jackass and get offended.


Swap out "holding doors" for whatever the fuck example you want.
 

mecegirl

New member
May 19, 2013
737
0
0
Phasmal said:
Ramzal said:
Did you tell him "Knock it off" in those exact words? Because that's probably why he flipped if that's the case. Am I saying "OH IT'S YOUR FAULT!!"? No. But he was doing something he found to be socially acceptable and appropriate with no ill will towards you, and if you responded with a hostile "Knock it off!" then I can understand him being frustrated. It sucks when you're being nice and someone flips at you.

Oh the other hand if you told him that you've got it and he persisted and he became morose trying to take the bags from you, then yeah. I can get you being upset by that.
Nope, didn't use those exact words, back then I was trying to let him down gently.

But that's exactly my point. This guy had known me for many years, but as soon as he decided he wanted to date me, he started treating me like a delicate flower when anyone who's known me more than five minutes could tell I would absolutely hate that. Because that's what he thought women should like/be like, regardless of what the individual he was trying to impress (I guess) actually wanted.

So, yeah, that whole thing was dumb.

We should all be polite to strangers, and making a show of yourself trying to be a `gentleman` is often more to do with you than the other person. (General `you`).
Sorta reminds me of my first boyfriend in highschool. He learned the lesson quickly, mostly because we were friends before he started liking me so he kinda knew better. I guess he felt the need to start treating me more like a "girl" than on of the guys since he was crushing on me. But he knew the sort of person I was so I don't even know why he bothered outside of tradition.

The day that he decided to ask me out he, and a mutual male friend, popped up at my locker that morning. I guess the mutual friend was there for emotional support or whatever. Anyway, old boyfriend asked if he could carry my books. I said "No I got it." without even thinking. The mutual friend leaned over and whispered to me that I should stop being so independent. Like what the fuck? We'd known each other for a year, he knew were my locker was, he or none of my other male friends had ever offered to carry them before. I must have given them the meanest glare after that because they shut up real quick.
 

CpT_x_Killsteal

Elite Member
Jun 21, 2012
1,519
0
41
Scratch everything I just wrote, I don't wanna get involved in this shit.

Now that I've cooled off, I'll try and understand things and articulate my thoughts.

1. It's a study with a tiny sample size. Is this peer reviewed? Probably not.

2. I can't actually read the study as it's behind a pay-wall. I sometimes fall for click-bait, but I'll never fall for click-bait behind a pay-wall.

3. From what I've read, some of the questions were pretty vague yes or no questions.

4. The "Ambivalent Sexism Index" sounds like bullshit. (It's on the Washington Post article that the National Review links)

5. Why do people think tabloids matter. I've never been able to comprehend this.