Since I found avast 5 years ago that's all I've used, it's free and catches most things so I'm happy with it.
oppositepiinyouri said:Used AVG for quite some time and was fairly happy with it. After a point though it started to become bloated and unnecessarily convoluted, so I dropped it and picked up Avast and I've been pleased with it since switching.
I also have MalwareBytes and SpyBot just for active scans.
Hmm, maybe it's gotten better - I've seen it slow down normal desktop PCs before and a friend of mine finally had to switch to a different AV because of it. I know a couple of other people also had issues with slowdowns but were fine with them, so they didn't move over to anything else.MorganL4 said:Define Heavy.... I have it running on my PC as we speak, If you combine Kaspersky and Malwarebytes (Which I use in tandem) it is still taking up only 5MB of RAM..... (Steam and Firefox are taking up the lions share.... its at 32% out of 8 gig)DoPo said:Best how? Kaspersky is quite thorough, but also very heavy duty - I wouldn't want it on my PC because it would take up too much resources. I'm using Avast! at the moment and that's OK, as it's free. If I was going to pay for something, then I would probably go with Nod32. And so on. What criteria are we applying here?
As far as my processor is concerned..... I have one core at 5% and the other three are fluctuating between 2% and 0%....
So I wouldn't call it a resource hog, considering my PC is 5 years old now....
Granted... When it is doing a full scan it is a REAL hog, but that only takes about 4 hours, and I do it every three days.... It runs while I'm at work, and I don't care how slow my computer is when I am not using it...
Same, even if they're getting better about the resources that they use up they've still got a shitton of catch-up to play before I'll ever consider them for my machines. Like having a decent free version.devotedsniper said:As for Norton and Mcafee I wouldn't touch them with a barge poll.
You sneaky ninja you. Diving out of the trees and swiping the wind from my sails.Esotera said:Linux...
My PC is about 7 years old (GPU is 4 or 5..) and a dual core so... Yeah kaspersky isn't THAT hungry a beast when it's only idling and noscoping malware scripts as it does. A full scan is a surefire way to make everything run like arse though!MorganL4 said:Define Heavy.... I have it running on my PC as we speak, If you combine Kaspersky and Malwarebytes (Which I use in tandem) it is still taking up only 5MB of RAM..... (Steam and Firefox are taking up the lions share.... its at 32% out of 8 gig)DoPo said:Best how? Kaspersky is quite thorough, but also very heavy duty - I wouldn't want it on my PC because it would take up too much resources. I'm using Avast! at the moment and that's OK, as it's free. If I was going to pay for something, then I would probably go with Nod32. And so on. What criteria are we applying here?
As far as my processor is concerned..... I have one core at 5% and the other three are fluctuating between 2% and 0%....
So I wouldn't call it a resource hog, considering my PC is 5 years old now....
Granted... When it is doing a full scan it is a REAL hog, but that only takes about 4 hours, and I do it every three days.... It runs while I'm at work, and I don't care how slow my computer is when I am not using it...