radioactive lemur said:This is awesome, who wouldn't want to shoot Bin Laden in the face?
(skip to 04:15)
radioactive lemur said:This is awesome, who wouldn't want to shoot Bin Laden in the face?
Yeah, it's going to be bad in every way imaginable I'm sure. I certainly won't buy it at least.Ice Azure said:Because we were making video games about WWII a week after it ended, right? No.l33tness08 said:Yes they have every right to do it. It's now a historical event. We make games about WWII don't we? How would this be different?
OT: Sounds interesting. Though it is probably going to just be a rushed game that isn't worth picking up.
Best reply.rokkolpo said:If you're not going to respect the dead can you at least ignore them?
This just seems fucking awful to me.
You make a very good point I think its a big shame that got cancelled seeing as if it was well done it could have actually helped legitimatise gaming as a medium that is fit for exploring more mature real life situations in a respectful way.Speakercone said:Meanwhile 6 Days In Fallujah will never be released.
I would play it.Kathinka said:how about a game where you have to hijack some planes and ram some certain high buildings with them then? historic event, right?l33tness08 said:Yes they have every right to do it. It's now a historical event. We make games about WWII don't we? How would this be different?
Note: I am American.TheDarkEricDraven said:Well, thats just bad taste. Right after he died even, I mean thats awOF COURSE ITS FINE ITS OSAMA BIN LADDEN!
And it should be at least as large as collosi.TheRealCJ said:Only if, and ONLY IF, you have to defeat him once, and then he runs away and you have to defeating him AGAIN in a Quad-minigun-armed mecha suit.
It's only fair.
Why respect those in death that could not be respected in life?rokkolpo said:If you're not going to respect the dead can you at least ignore them?
This just seems fucking awful to me.