Poll: Breast feeding

[spartan231490]

Do it in private. Nobody else wants to see your kid suckling away. We don't care if you think breastmilk is bestmilk, they invented breast pumps for a reason.

When a kid's hungry, a kid's hungry. There isn't always a "decent" place to go and do it. Like, say, an airplane. Surely you wouldn't expect women to try and squeeze into that little bathroom and try to feed? Plus, you're talking about feeding...in a bathroom. A public bathroom. I wouldn't eat my lunch in a public bathroom, and so I wouldn't expect or even want a woman to feed her baby (who will be much more sensitive to germs) in one.

Also, I worked at Disney World for a while. Since it's Florida state law, women are allowed to breastfeed anywhere in the park. The only thing they are required to go and sequester themselves for is "pumping," or filling bottles with breastmilk to use to feed at a later time (which they could do at the park First Aid center). And the more I thought about that, the more it made sense. Like the airplane, there are few sanitary and private areas to go.

I'm sorry that you find it visually displeasing, but if I have to put up with fat, hairy old men strutting about topless and showing off their disgusting belly-buttons, forced to be outies due to their obesity, I think you can handle a woman breastfeeding a child.

He did point out that there are breast pumps, so it was a little odd of you to go jumping down his throat saying how there aren't private areas to breast feed everywhere. Since mothers can easily carry breast milk in bottles to feed their infants without breastfeeding in public.

OF: That said, I'm kinda in the middle on this one. I don't particularly want to see it, and I think it would just be polite to find a spot that was, if not private, at least out of the way. That said, it's polite to hold the door for someone, I don't launch a shit-storm if someone doesn't.

 

[Ramzal]

There's no issue with breast feeding in public. However, if you try to do it, without covering the breast and your child you have no right to complain if some guy/girl is just looking at your bare breast. If someone complains about it still then for pete's sake, the baby is only eating.

 

[BreakfastMan]

Well, I am personally fine with women walking around topless (why the hell is this still illegal in the states?), so I see no problem with it. I find the "controversy" over it inane.

 

[pandorum]

When a kid's hungry, a kid's hungry. There isn't always a "decent" place to go and do it. Like, say, an airplane. Surely you wouldn't expect women to try and squeeze into that little bathroom and try to feed? Plus, you're talking about feeding...in a bathroom. A public bathroom. I wouldn't eat my lunch in a public bathroom, and so I wouldn't expect or even want a woman to feed her baby (who will be much more sensitive to germs) in one.

Hey, lemme show you this new invention that negates this issue.

See, this miracle invention lets you feed a baby pretty much anything without whipping the girls out. So what you do before taking the kid into public is you pump a bit of breastmilk out, fill a few of those with said breastmilk, and then put them in a bag alongside the fresh diapers and whatnot. When the kid starts annoying everyone in a three block radius because it's hungry you feed it from the bottle. That way you don't have to latch it onto a tit in public, yet at the same time it still gets the same nutritional benefit as if you had done so.


An additional benefit of doing this is that, if he's crazy, dad can also take the kid out on his own and still feed it! See, he doesn't have working tits, but if mom fills a few bottles in the morning with her milk he can still take care of this basic need without resorting to formula. Gosh, isn't modern technology absolutely wonderful?



I swear it's like nobody in this world can not fathom putting anything but formula in a baby bottle or something. Holy shit people. They're fancy cups with a fake nipple on 'em, you could put any liquid you wanted to in one. There's nothing stopping you from filling one with gasoline, although using that bottle to feed a baby is for obvious reasons not a good idea.

You Sir make a lot of sense glad to see that brains still exist, in an age where children are not allowed to watch road runner because they might copy it these types are all over forums nowadays.

 

[Hazy992]

I don't have a problem with it and I don't understand why anyone would. Breasts aren't just a sexual thing, she's feeding her baby. That's what they're for

If it bothers you so much then don't look.

 

[The Mighty Stove]

I think it's fine in most public settings except in say, a restaurant or diner. Seriously I'm trying to enjoy my meal, I'm glad you love your child and want to nurture him/her. But I don't want to see all that going on. This rule especially applies if your baby is screaming... LEAVE then come back when he/she is done.

Other then say that setting it honestly doesn't bother me.

 

[ElPatron]

I don't see how it's unsanitary, it's just a breast and milk, if it's THAT unsanitary then a woman wouldn't be allowed to feed by formula either.

Just like urine and spit are just urine and spit. They won't kill you or anything, but you don't want them on your swimming pool or on your restaurant floor.

I didn't even want to take part in this argument, but come on. Milk not being that unsanitary is a very fair point but hair isn't that unsanitary either, and we flip if we see a bunch of them floating on our soup.

 

[Screamarie]

I don't see how it's unsanitary, it's just a breast and milk, if it's THAT unsanitary then a woman wouldn't be allowed to feed by formula either.

Just like urine and spit are just urine and spit. They won't kill you or anything, but you don't want them on your swimming pool or on your restaurant floor.

I didn't even want to take part in this argument, but come on. Milk not being that unsanitary is a very fair point but hair isn't that unsanitary either, and we flip if we see a bunch of them floating on our soup.

Yes, but hair is dead cells growing out of your head, milk is...milk. Just like the stuff you put in your coffee or cereal. And she's not squirting it around the room, the baby is suckling it.

 

[teebeeohh]

not a problem at all.
just apply some common sense when doing it, i am OK with you loving your kid and the fact that you have bodily functions but if you insist on feeding your kid in a restaurant try to cover it up or fill a bottle in advance or something. it's the same issue i have with people making out or smoking where other people eat.

 

[Evilsanta]

I never had a problem with this. Sure it makes me slightly uncomfortable but that it. It's not like it's hard to look the other way or just ignore it.

If it bothers you so much then don't look.

Also this. You don't have to look at the mother breastfeeding her baby, It's not like they force you watch them do it.

 

[I.N.producer]

I'd say bottles are better for in public. I recently went out to dinner with my sister, brother-in-law, and my new nephew. My sister started breastfeeding while we were waiting for our food, and it was a bit awkward for me.

Yeah, when the baby's hungry you feed it, but the bottle just makes it a bit less awkward for everyone else. Of course, when there isn't a bottle readily available, the obvious choice is just breastfeeding.

In short, public breastfeeding is okay, but bottle feeding is preferable.

 

[ElPatron]

Yes, but hair is dead cells growing out of your head, milk is...milk. Just like the stuff you put in your coffee or cereal. And she's not squirting it around the room, the baby is suckling it.

Dead cells. Sterile. Piss. Stinks but it doesn't hurt, who hasn't heard about urinating on wounds if there is nothing around to clean them?

At least I am sure that the milk on my cereal was properly controlled. For all I know human milk from someone I don't know might contain diseases.

 

[game-lover]

I have no real opinion.

Can't say it offends or anything. But I do think it can be distracting and perhaps even gross to some people.

That being said, I just say, whip it out all you want but don't get all pissy if someone ends up straight up staring. Because I probably would. When it's something that stands out, and it would. Exposure of flesh amongst everyone covered up, these things get your attention. So if I see it, I'm gonna look.

Would it be more polite to look away? It's thought impolite to breastfeed in public, I hear but ladies wanna do it anyway.

Fair? I think it's fair.

 

[Lilani]

I've got no issue with females being topless. What I take offense to is the babies feeding off said exposed tits.

Again, I'm afraid that's your issue, not theirs. I also don't have a problem with men being topless. I only take offense when they're old, fat, hairy, smelly, and very close to me.

And surely it's not a regular thing for you, anyway. I only catch a glimpse of a woman breastfeeding, like, once a year at most. And I know I see a lot more smelly topless men than breastfeeding women.

 

[frizzlebyte]

I'm not actually voting in the poll, since I'm not quite sure how I feel about it. I do know that I think if you have to feed your kid, you gotta feed your kid no matter the place. However, I think a blanket covering the action is not too much to ask, and really should just be common sense.

abyss gazes is right, we are odd about the body in general in the USA. Quite a few people here think it is indecent for a woman's pregnant stomach to be visible.

I suspect that it has a lot to do with the religious conservatism that has been a cultural force here for hundreds of years. Even before the so-called Christian Conservative movement.

 

[AnnaIME]

Well "breast milk is better" is true, but then you can bottle breast milk too you know.

Well, some women can, and others can't. Babies and pumps don't actually suck the milk out, they stimulate the breast to sort of shoot the milk out. (Yes, the pressure can be quite high. Yes, if baby chooses to let go, nosey spectators can get an eye-ful.) For some women, the milk just won't come unless there is a warm, hungry, hormone-triggering baby ready to recieve.

Then there's the matter of breastfeeding being a skill that both mother and baby have to learn. Eating from a bottle is a matter of just swallowing fast enough and not choking. Suckling is hard work for a small baby. If they don't learn the skill and build enough strength, they can lose the ability to suckle altogether.

Thirdly: milk from the breast is fresh, at the right temperature and nearly always ready. Pumped milk from a bottle has to be refrigerated and heated, risking loss of quality. Pumps and bottles have to be cleaned. When you have a baby, there is plenty of necessary work without adding more.

Forthly: when a baby feeds from the breast, the first sucks have a different composition than the last, ensuring that the baby gets enough liquid before it gets sated. Pumped milk is the same all through the bottle.

Should all these aspects be disregarded because some people feel "awkward"?

 

[KingsGambit_v1legacy]

Yes it is natural, and yes it is unequivocally healthier for a baby, but whether or not all the teenage boys in this thread agree or not, breasts are more than just their biological purpose. Breasts, if not a woman's entire body has a sexual effect. Breasts can and most likely will cause arousal in men, even (or despite) serving their biological purpose. Breast feeding in public isn't "disgusting" by any means, but it is awkward. We have rules of decency (which are satanic by islamic standards for one thing!) and exposing breasts goes against those rules.

Anyone who compares a woman's chest with a man's is being foolish. A man's chest might well be masculine but it doesn't represent or provoke sexuality. It is accepted the world over as such. While many societies don't think anything of breasts (and their being exposed is commonplace and unexciting), in western societies at least, that is not the case. There are breast pumps which can be used to bottle breast milk for feeding babies in public.

 

[Helmholtz Watson]

-snip-

Rather than typing out an elaborate response, I'll put it this way. Some women don't want to bother storing and carrying around the bottle, and some women just want to breastfeed.


Not your body, not your baby, not your problem. Nasty old men get to strut around in public with their shirts off, and they have no constructive reason for doing so. They just do it for the hell of it, because they want to. And I don't go around asking them to stop doing it because I don't like it. I look away and move on with my life.

First off, "I don't feel like it" is a poor answer. TestECull provided a reasonable alternative to showing breast in public and your justification is childish. As for the old men comment, TestECull already stated that he was in favor of allowing women to walk around topless, and the old men are not breast feeding. When you start seeing old men breast feed, then your comment might be relevant. Until then however, it is just a red herring.

OP:As long as the women isn't doing it in a confined space and she has a blanket covering it, I'm fine with it. Also, no restaurants.

Capcha:Close quarters <---A place I definitely don't want to be when a women is breast feeding.

 

[Conn1496]

Well it's natural isn't it? Quite a lot of human behaviour decribed as "odd", "unnatural" or otherwise is actually pretty common in humans as well as other species. After all, we are animals at the core of it. Highly sentient animals capable of creating wonderous things, but all in all still animals.

 

[karloss01]

All I can say it was an interesting experiance when my high school teacher did it in class...