I don't know. I've learned from experience that reviews can't be trusted.
Fallout 3: Critical Acclaim. I thought it was an atmosphere-less pile of crap.
Medal of Honor: Mixed reviews on this one. I thought that the multiplayer was mediocre. I. Fucking. Loved. The single-player. It's the only game I've ever called too short.
Now what I mean by that is that, say a game like Kane & Lynch 2, which was short, but (Based on the demo I played) was an unpolished, nauseating experience. I wanted less after the demo, so I don't call it too short, I call it too long.
Well... Speaking of which, K&L2 got average reviews and... well I thought it was an awful game just from the demo alone.
Metroid: Other M got above average reviews and I can honestly say that it was by far the worst game I've ever played. I cannot find a single good thing to say about it.
CoD MW2 and BlOps got above average reviews and I hate the both of them. Which is strange because if you look at my summaries on paper "They are mirror opposites of each other" you'd think I love one of them. But I don't. I mean that everything MW2 got wrong, BlOps get's.. occasionally right and everything MW2 got right BlOps gets wrong.
I tried the Mass Effect 2 demo for PS3 and I honestly was not impressed. Combat and gameplay overall seemed unpolished. The other stuff was pretty good. That might have been enough to get me interested. But then I noticed that there is aim assist. That you can't turn off.
So in other words: fuck you BioWare.
I think you get the point.
If there's a demo for Brink I'll check that out once the PSN is back online and base whether I get it or not off of that. If there is no demo than... well I won't be getting it.