Poll: Capitalism or Communism?

BlackStar42

New member
Jan 23, 2010
1,226
0
0
Government regulated capitalism. The corporations and government will act as a check on each other, therefore neither can get enough power to start fucking the people over too badly. In general, the middle ground is the best place to be- go too far in either direction, and things go to shit.
 

Toby Kitching

New member
Oct 24, 2011
53
0
0
in capitalism, man exploits his fellow man. In communism, it's the other way around.

I can't remember who said that. But seriously, pure capitalism doesn't work, and pure communism doesn't work (or rather, it works, but quickly degenerates into maoism or stalinism or some equally hellish format). It's just that communism fails to work a bit faster.
 

kiwi_poo

New member
Apr 15, 2009
826
0
0
UltraHammer said:
kiwi_poo said:
dj Facchiano said:
Capitalism. The ideals of communism are better, but capitalism is more in tune with human nature.
what, you mean "fuck everyone but me"?
A misconception people have with economics is that in a transaction, one party becomes richer and the other party becomes poorer. Sort of like how sports work; if one team wins, that means the other team lost. But that's not at all what happens.

Here's the basic rundown:
When person Y gives something to person Z, and person Z gives something to person Y, in an agreed upon manner; that works. That's the basic element that fuels a productive, free society.

However...
When person Y takes something from person X against person X's will, that fails. That's the basic element of poverty and misery.

Person B taking something from person C, D, E, F, G and H against their wills, that's what socialism and communism is. Person B is the government.
no, person B taking from C, D, E, F, G and H and redistributing it equally is communism.
what you discribed is liberalism.

oh, and socialism is very different from communism
 

jyork89

New member
Jun 29, 2010
116
0
0
Capitalism. Or rather a mix of the Capitalism and Socialism. In pure socialist countries the people may not be starving. However, Eastern Europe was a continent of people who had no hopes, dreams or aspirations.
Workers with dreams and goals work harder than workers whose sole purpose it is to work. Even if the dream is only an illusion. Of course, with pure capitalism we encounter the same problems as eventually large companies will dominate and the average Joe won't stand a chance of competing.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Jak23 said:
I was wondering what the general consensus is, please comment and tell us why.
My vote goes to Capitalism, because imo if you say Communism, you haven't seen/been in a Communist country.
Not many Capitalist countries either. Oligarchies, Monarchies and Republics, but no Capitalist societies.
 

Jimmybobjr

New member
Aug 3, 2010
365
0
0
Jak23 said:
you haven't seen/been in a Communist country.
Very few people have, if any. Technically, Russia was Stalinist, not Socialist, not Communist. China is Capitalist, not Socialist, not Communist, Cuba was just as Fascist as Communist, and not a single European state owned by Russia was Communist. They all call themselves communist to pacify the working population.

If the communism that was on that above poll was TRUE Communism- which hasnt ever existed yet -then i would vote for that.

Unfortunately, True communism is impossible, and would never ever work in a modern world. Ever.

If it would, i would be all for it, though.

Capitalism is a horrible, horrible system, but its all we got.
 

Sangreal Gothcraft

New member
Feb 28, 2011
298
0
0
Communism NEVER EXSISTED...and NEVER WILL.... What people confuse with Communism they comfuse it with Socialism.... Not the same really. Communism=Utopian Society with no goverment...Sounds Sexyon paper by never worked though it did in Really Small Communities.....
I'm more into a Market Driven Economy...Supply and deman and what not..
 

A Satanic Panda

New member
Nov 5, 2009
714
0
0
It would be interesting to retry communism sense we now have supercomputers that could micro-manage every aspect of the economy. I'd still go for capitalism because in its current state, it works well enough.
 

Squaseghost

New member
Jan 25, 2010
86
0
0
Capitalism; where the rich get richer, and the poor get richer.


but seriously. Property rights are pretty damn important.
 

Howard.Murdock

New member
May 27, 2010
5
0
0
The problem with most modern political theory is that we seem to be determined to say "x or y, nothing in between". This wild fluxuation between extremes does not work - if you look at the current economic situation in the United States right now, for example, where the wealth of 96 million Americans is equal to the wealth of a grand total of 6 members of the Walton family, you see a continuing pattern of poverty caused by accumulation of wealth and power at the top. Without government regulation and (horrors!) socialist policies, that accumulation continues ad infinitum.

On the other hand, go too far in the socialist bent (specifically, fly right into communist territory) and you end up with a system that is a: incredibly easy to manipulate and b: results in the stagnation of society, due to a lack of incentives to work or advance culture, science, art, etc, on the individual level. Pure government control does not and cannot work as well as allowing some level of independence - the question is how much is too much, how little is too little.

So, my long answer to the poll is, I refuse to answer the poll as it only propagates this idea of x or y, and damn the compromise position that may work better if only because is cannot be easily quantified in a single sentence.
 

DPeteD

New member
May 29, 2011
107
0
0
Capitalism, as Communism just bloody well never works, but really no system is perfect as humans are running it but at the end of the day Capitalism, while not perfect is the best we got.
 

Tooshay

New member
Dec 23, 2011
10
0
0
Jimmybobjr said:
Jak23 said:
you haven't seen/been in a Communist country.
Very few people have, if any. Technically, Russia was Stalinist, not Socialist, not Communist. China is Capitalist, not Socialist, not Communist, Cuba was just as Fascist as Communist, and not a single European state owned by Russia was Communist. They all call themselves communist to pacify the working population.

If the communism that was on that above poll was TRUE Communism- which hasnt ever existed yet -then i would vote for that.

Unfortunately, True communism is impossible, and would never ever work in a modern world. Ever.

If it would, i would be all for it, though.

Capitalism is a horrible, horrible system, but its all we got.
Marxist-Leninist Socialism (which is what the USSR was) is communism. Because you know, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin were the ones who started the USSR experiment.
 

Adam Jensen_v1legacy

I never asked for this
Sep 8, 2011
6,651
0
0
Kopikatsu said:
Communism works. In theory.

Capitalism works. In theory.

Both are shitty in reality, but Communism sounds better on paper.
In a nutshell.

Democratic socialism is like a middle ground. Just ask the Scandinavians. They live in real democratic socialist countries and they're the richest and most developed (culturally) countries in the world. They actually have internet as human right in Sweden! How awesome is that?
 

scorptatious

The Resident Team ICO Fanboy
May 14, 2009
7,405
0
0
Well, seeing as how I was raised in a capitalistic country, I sort of feel inclined to vote for capitalism.
 

Robert Ewing

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,977
0
0
Communism is great in theory. Too bad people are bastard covered bastards with bastard fillings.

Communism is a good ideal to have, but compared to capitalism it's incredibly weak, and flimsy. It can take just one man to act out of line, or try to be ambitious for communism to come crumbling to it's knees. See Russia. China has only succeeded through questionable social experiments and embracing capitalism as a quite integral support beam.

Capitalism itself is great for the individual. It works for the worthy, and the ones who know how the system works. Which sounds a good deal in theory, why shouldn't the ones who deserve it get what they want right?

Well, it WOULD make sense, until you figure out that not everyone can get worthy, no matter how worthy they actually are. And capitalism needs middle classes and lower classes, they are absolutely essential to making a capitalist country work, yet they get so much schtick for being either less intelligent, less well off or even less ambitious. Capitalism is basically an astronaut poking his air supply with a blowtorch. He needs it if he wants to survive, but he can never forgive it for sleeping with his wife... Wait...

Basically capitalism is extremely divided. You have massive winners, and massive losers. With communism, if you've done it right, which seems unlikely, means that everyone will correlate somewhere in the middle of the 'content' zone.
 

Mad Sun

New member
Jul 15, 2011
53
0
0
I voted Capitalism, simply because eventually a few philanthropists will give back what they had taken, but is impossible in a "Communist" (the governmental form, not the economic theory) society.

The thing is, I much prefer Socialism, because, while I like being able to advance up the ladder at my own pace, I also want to start off on an even footing with my neighbor, with his neighbors, etc. Basic Socialism is different from basic Communism, however, you simply cannot have a pure economic system. You cannot have a purely Capitalist system, as eventually our human compassion will kick in and we'll say "Protect the workers!" or a purely Communist system, as eventually our human competitiveness will kick in and we'll say "Give me more shit I don't need so I can show off!" Socialism makes sure to provide all with the basic means to start off. As in, a poor person need not stay poor simply because he was born so. The government is tasked with paying for housing, utilities, education, and healthcare. That doesn't (or at least shouldn't) mean that they'll pay for it forever. Just until you don't need it anymore. That doesn't mean you won't still pay taxes, you'll just have a larger house of your own.

What we have here in America is far similar to Socialism that it is to Capitalism, however, it's not great, or even good, as some people still think we're Capitalists, and refuse to pass any laws that make us "Communist" (See: Healthcare, Education), and refuse to raise taxes, even though the potential revenue is just the windfall we need to get the government back on its feet.

Side Note: Eff you, you ARE going to pay taxes anyway. Better your tax money go to furthering human progress than lining a politician's back pocket, eh?
 

A Free Man

New member
May 9, 2010
322
0
0
trooperpaul said:
erttheking said:
Communism has been tried again and again and again and it JUST DOESN'T WORK! It's well intentioned but fundamentally flawed.
Capitalism has been tried again and again and again and it JUST DOESN'T WORK! It's well intentioned but fundamentally flawed.
I wouldn't agree with this. I mean sure there are plenty of issues with the system and I'm no politician but the bottom line comes down to I and pretty much everyone I know lives in a capitalist society and we like the majority of how it works. Even if there are flaws, if the majority of people like how a country is being run I would say the system is working.
 

SlideRail

New member
Jun 16, 2011
4
0
0
Adam Jensen said:
Kopikatsu said:
Communism works. In theory.

Capitalism works. In theory.

Both are shitty in reality, but Communism sounds better on paper.
In a nutshell.

Democratic socialism is like a middle ground. Just ask the Scandinavians. They live in real democratic socialist countries and they're the richest and most developed (culturally) countries in the world. They actually have internet as human right in Sweden! How awesome is that?
Actually, they don't. They have no corporate income tax, a downright regressive income tax (Working and middle class wages are stable over time. The wealthy's are not owing to multiple fluctuating income streams. With the huge income stream and planning needed to administer a welfare state, it falls to the regular working stiffs to pay their own way) less regulation than we have here in the states and the highest national average scores on the individualism index.

Back in the 1850s Sweden was a barely developed peasant state before they embraced capitalism and then they embraced it with a zeal and fervor rarely seen and they developed rapidly. In the seventies and eighties a large tide of social democrat sentiment swept the country and when the economy slowed down in the nineties, they threw them out of office and it shows. Currently, they're privatizing the fuck out of their healthcare system (with 25% of clinics and emergency facilities privately owned because, surprise surprise, the government is not the most efficient service provider.)

Even in their last parliamentary election, the socialists ran on the platform of throwing out the recent market liberalization reforms that were put in place. They got spanked.