True, I mean that's the nature of man and sports, right? Any competition, from MMA to downhill skiing you may want a certain character/personality to win for just reasons, whatever they are. And that's what makes it entertaining.mduncan50 said:No such thing as a bad reason. I love seeing people's different motivations for choosing one side or the other. I've seen everything from which actor is cutest to which side would actually win in a fight. If it gets you into the struggle of the movie then who's to say that one reason is better than any other.JohnnyDelRay said:I'd go with Iron Man simply for that fact that it'd be more interesting. I know this probably doesn't have much bearing on anything, but just going for the goody-two-shoes is kind of too expected. Just going from Stark's issues in Ultron, I mean...he was basically the villain of that movie. And his higher intelligence and overcompensated reasoning in protecting the human race just always ends badly. So I'd like to see where he goes with it.
In the recent Bats vs. Supes it was an easy choice for me, because Supes was boring and Bats would have to think of a functional approach. Even though here I believe Iron Man has the upper hand, the downside for him is if anything goes wrong or interferes with his suit he's done for.