Poll: Choose your weapon!

Zacharine

New member
Apr 17, 2009
2,854
0
0
I'm tempted to go with a bow or a crossbow just for the range factor (I'm assuming that you didn't know about how long guns have existed and so they are out of the running...)

but I'm going to go for a sword without a shield. A Zweihänder to be more precise, from the renaissance, though it is often called the Greatsword in laymans terms.

Why?

Because I have some basic training with it. We are about to go to war and while the crossbow has a definitive advantage, reloading takes time and up close it is fairly useless as a melee weapon.

Of course if I could take two, then it would be the crossbow as main weapon, with an arming sword or a side-sword to go with it as close-range weaponry.
 

RelexCryo

New member
Oct 21, 2008
1,414
0
0
SakSak said:
I'm tempted to go with a bow or a crossbow just for the range factor (I'm assuming that you didn't know about how long guns have existed and so they are out of the running...)

but I'm going to go for a sword without a shield. A Zweihänder to be more precise, from the renaissance, though it is often called the Greatsword in laymans terms.

Why?

Because I have some basic training with it. We are about to go to war and while the crossbow has a definitive advantage, reloading takes time and up close it is fairly useless as a melee weapon.

Of course if I could take two, then it would be the crossbow as main weapon, with an arming sword or a side-sword to go with it as close-range weaponry.
I already made a post about guns (and Fantasy Gun Control in general), as well as the OP's incorrect assumption that conscripts get armor.
 

m.zajac

New member
Jan 25, 2010
151
0
0
There is a little overlap with Option #1 and Option #2 seeing as how a Bastard Sword is a Longsword, but nonetheless I'd choose a Morningstar and a Kite Shield.
 

RicoADF

Welcome back Commander
Jun 2, 2009
3,147
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
Considering I've had no martial weapon training, I'd probably go with a crossbow. Any idiot can use one of those.
So would I, also I prefer to stay a distance from my enemy and pick them off.
 

Summerstorm

Elite Member
Sep 19, 2008
1,433
81
53
Depends... do i get an armor? I mean a REAL armor? If not than sword and shield, if yes, two-handed sword. Why? Because its the only thing i have at least a tiny bit of training in. I am not going into a fight with something i am horrible at.

If it is a formation-fight a nice longspear is good too though. And if i can stay back and do nothing: Bow is fine too *g*.
 

flaming_squirrel

New member
Jun 28, 2008
1,031
0
0
gagagagagagaga said:
What weapon do you take and why?
Bastard sword and longsword are essentially the same thing, you're not going to be using one with a shield.
Swords are really not a viable choice as a main weapon as they simply were not used as one when on foot (with a few exceptions), for infantry you'd be stuck with a polearm.

I'd take a poleaxe, very versatile.
 

Vondrakenhof

New member
Apr 15, 2009
90
0
0
Since I've done some archery I'd have to go with the bow. Problem is, since you said you can only have one weapon I'd be screwed If anyone charged me. Every archer brings a back up weapon...
 

AnarchistAbe

The Original RageQuit Rebel
Sep 10, 2009
389
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
Considering I've had no martial weapon training, I'd probably go with a crossbow. Any idiot can use one of those.
Yea, I'm gonna go ahead and agree. However, I'd take a longbow over a crossbow. I already know how to shoot one of those, and have decent accuracy as well.
 

Eliam_Dar

New member
Nov 25, 2009
1,517
0
0
Sword with shield, close and personal, with a shiny armor. Hit with shield, finish with sword style. A shield could easily deflect an arrow or spear and open your oponents guard.
 

Julianking93

New member
May 16, 2009
14,715
0
0
This:



Impractical? Yes.

Most likely useless in one on one combat? Yes.

Look like a badass using it? Fuck yeah!
 

axle 19

Bearer of the Necronomicon
Aug 2, 2008
3,444
0
0
A claymore or broadsword. It has more than enough power with its two handed grip and allows me a fair amount of reach.
 

HuntrRose

New member
Apr 28, 2009
328
0
0
Colour-Scientist said:
Daystar Clarion said:
Considering I've had no martial weapon training, I'd probably go with a crossbow. Any idiot can use one of those.
Crossbows are actually really difficult to use. You have to build up alot of muscle in your arms and such, Men who used them had alot of training from quite a young age generally.
Nope. The crossbows were "loaded" with a winch mechanism and were very easy to use. Drawback is seriously low rate of fire, as in about 1 shot every 1-2 min.

The longbow on the other hand, hard to use, but very high rate of fire.

OT: I'd take a Katana. Can be used as both a 1-handed and 2-handed sword. It's lightweight, compared to it's european counterparts, and let's fave it, it's just cooler!

Oh, and I'd also go for leather armor. None of that seriously heavy metal thingies for me. I'd rather avoid the blows than hope my armor stops them for me.
 

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,831
0
0
I'd go for ranged. Reason? The English won pretty much every war that they were in, and managed to win most battles even when massively outnumbered (see Agincourt) simply because our young male children were trained, by law, to use a longbow from childhood. It was a legal requirement that every male above a certain age had to practise at the archery butts with a longbow (size increasing as they got older) for a certain amount of time per week. The result? Almost every English soldier was deadly with the bow and could wipe out masses of enemy troops with a few quick volleys, which is one of the ways we managed to win at Agincourt. If you had a crossbow as well for close quarters or indoor fighting, you were pretty much guaranteed to be on the winning side.

So yeah, ranged weaponry for me.
 

Ze_Reaper_Of_Zeath

New member
Feb 20, 2010
635
0
0
Crossbow, **** everyone before they get to you. Unless, they run like some kinda mutated car, then your the one who's dead.
 

Abedeus

New member
Sep 14, 2008
7,412
0
0
Why would you want a shield (smaller than 20cm in diameter, a circle) with a rapier? They're meant for fast and agile combat, not slashing and hacking.

I'm going to go with a huge war hammer. Or a sledgehammer. Or "Horseman's pick". Or a morning star.

Polish pick:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f9/Polish_Horseman%27s_picks_from_XVII_century.PNG

Another Polish weapon, this time a flail:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7a/Cep_bojowy_0211.jpg

Morning star?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Klassischer-Flegel.jpg

All awesome and superior to swords in armored combat.

Gundam031415 said:
Crossbow, **** everyone before they get to you. Unless, they run like some kinda mutated car, then your the one who's dead.
You miss, and by the time you reload, everyone will be at your feet, ready to crush your head open.