Weird, Agrincourt. I've learned about it as "Azincourt", but whatever.Trivun said:I'd go for ranged. Reason? The English won pretty much every war that they were in, and managed to win most battles even when massively outnumbered (see Agincourt) simply because our young male children were trained, by law, to use a longbow from childhood. It was a legal requirement that every male above a certain age had to practise at the archery butts with a longbow (size increasing as they got older) for a certain amount of time per week. The result? Almost every English soldier was deadly with the bow and could wipe out masses of enemy troops with a few quick volleys, which is one of the ways we managed to win at Agincourt. If you had a crossbow as well for close quarters or indoor fighting, you were pretty much guaranteed to be on the winning side.
So yeah, ranged weaponry for me.
England won because they had archers, yes. But France lost, because they had crossbows instead of normal bows. While they had 100m range advantage over the archers, the English could fire 5 arrows in the same time a French archer would fire 1 bolt.
The English didn't use crossbows.