Poll: Circumcision - What is your opinion?

Recommended Videos

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
OldRat said:
Ultratwinkie said:
OldRat said:
Hellz_Barz said:
awesomeClaw said:
PROS:

Lasts longer (during sex)
Prove this fact op, cause it sounds like bull to me.
Less sensitivity means slower orgasm. And since sensitivity is lowered by circumcision, you blow your load slower. So it's kinda just rephrasing one his cons, the fact that your penis loses sensitivity.
... what?

You do realize that varies from person to person right?
Sure, but generally, less stimulation will make for a slower orgasm. And generally, circumcision has been found to lower sensitivity. So yeah, there are exceptions, but that doesn't make it any less true.
That's not necessarily a good thing - some people already have trouble achieving orgasm and circumcision would make that even harder. Now, granted, men have much higher chance of achieving orgasm as a population, but still.

Now, that said, I have no objection to an adult choosing to have a circumcision, especially if he has no other way to 'go the distance', but forcing circumcision on a child who's not even remotely close to being sexually active yet is just robbing them of their ability to decide for themselves.
 

Mr Montmorency

New member
Jun 29, 2010
513
0
0
Circumcision has about as much use as sanding off your nipples.

Sure, there isn't really a use for it, but even so, why go to the trouble of getting it removed?
 

xDarc

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
1,333
0
41
LEAVE BABY PENIS ALONE!

My circumcision was too aggressive, they took too much skin away from me. As a young boy, erections were PAINFUL. My skin was having trouble growing with me.

Mostly, as I grew, more and more scrotal skin ended up being pulled onto my shaft. So instead of having a nice smooth uncut penis, I had a ballsack that, at one point, connected half way up my shaft- and hair. Also, downward curve from being pulled so taught is not optimum.

I have been trying to correct this by manually stretching the skin myself, not the whole thing- just the skin. Skin grows if it's stretched often enough. The new skin is much lighter in color and so far I've managed to create an extra inch patch on the dorsal side.

Anyway, I wish I had a choice. Or at least wait until I'm fully grown for fucks sake. I would have had a porn star member.
 

xDarc

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
1,333
0
41
And all these people saying uncircumcised look nicer? Compared to what? Have you seen Ron Jeremy in 90's porn? It looks like a dried out piece of leather for fucks sake.

The penis is supposed to be a mucosal organ, it's supposed to be kept moist. Cutting a cock dries it out until it's as smooth and sensitive as a piece of elbow skin.

When do they look nicer? When they are soft? Does it really matter what a limp dick looks like?

When they blow up... guess what happens? Roll that stuff back and oh my! There's a smooth, shiny glans that puts a gnarly/bumpy cut one to shame.

Sorry- i just hear this uninformed nonsense so much and I get sick of it.
 

Soviet Steve

New member
May 23, 2009
1,509
0
0
You can do what you wish with your body at your own risk, but you cannot do what you wish with the bodies of others at their risk.

Your God might say that you should, but Gods are easy to invent or recycle, so if we make laws on that basis then I may as well make a God who says that all parents who circumsize must be skinned alive and set on fire, and then us opponents would have a free card to do so.
 

phantasmalWordsmith

New member
Oct 5, 2010
911
0
0
I was circumcised at an early age but not as a baby. I'm not Jewish but apparently the foreskin was going to be too tight so I had to get it circumcised much like my father and grandfather who had the same problems.

I think reasons such as cases like my own and religion make it okay to get snipped but otherwise you might as well leave it there till the boy is 16 or something like that then they can decide for themselves
 

MelziGurl

New member
Jan 16, 2009
1,096
0
0
incal11 said:
MelziGurl said:
As long as my reasons for doing so are in the interests of my own children's welfare I don't see what business it is of anyone else's.
That's the thing, it is not for your children welfare, it is for your own peace of mind.
When they grow up it will be their biseness, not yours, and it is very unlikely they will develop something that will make them regret not being circumcised before. Also because it is proven that it will lessen their sexual pleasure.
I guess it sucks then that until the they reach such an age the child's business IS their parents which is 18-21 depending on where you live. Therefore, whether I circumcise my children or not will be my business. And my reasons have nothing do with sexual pleasure as I believe that is just a ridiculous excuse in some cases and they do have everything to do with the welfare of said child regardless of whether you believe my reasons to be for my own piece of mind.
 

dogenzakaminion

New member
Jun 15, 2010
669
0
0
I'm sure whatever I say has been said, but in today's world, hygiene isn't an issue in this area. I'm not circumcised and it's not hard to clean at all...if it is easier it can't be more than marginal, not warranting a significant "pros" spot.

The sex argument about feeling less is to my knowledge true, which does suck, but lasting longer depends on a lot of things. One could train themselves to last longer without removing the foreskin. Besides, I'm sure a guy would rather it felt better but lasted shorter.

I think it's wrong to do it to a child when they have no say, but if a responsible adult wants to make that decision then why not. His body.
 

xDarc

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
1,333
0
41
The Dr0w Ranger said:
Hell, I would go so far as to posit that a lot of guys who were circumcised and ***** do it because they overestimate the loss in pleasure.
Or they get a fuckwit to perform it and end up with their balls attached half way up their shaft when they're fully grown, like I did.

No baby mutilation. Not all circumcisions are performed to the same standard; and I'm not just talking about execution- there are actually different basic types that are more or less aggressive in their removal of extra skin.

I had an aggressive complete removal of all of it and they were a litle too aggressive or I grew too big...

As I child, I remember crying to my father about why pee pee hurt so bad when it got hard. He told me it was just muscle cramps and to stop being a baby.

Fuck you dad.
 

MelziGurl

New member
Jan 16, 2009
1,096
0
0
xDarc said:
When they blow up... guess what happens? Roll that stuff back and oh my! There's a smooth, shiny glans that puts a gnarly/bumpy cut one to shame.
Just putting it out there that I've had both and uncircumsised in my opinion...was as annoying as hell -_-
 

Snor

New member
Mar 17, 2009
462
0
0
i dont really get why people say uncircumcised is weird looking etc.... if erect they are pretty much the same, its not like you have a huge flap of skin hanging around.

also fapping is easier + i dont do cutting of body parts neither does the rest of this country


why is it such an important thing america anyway? I mean its a jewish tradition and america is predominantly christian so...how did that happen
 

xDarc

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
1,333
0
41
MelziGurl said:
xDarc said:
When they blow up... guess what happens? Roll that stuff back and oh my! There's a smooth, shiny glans that puts a gnarly/bumpy cut one to shame.
Just putting it out there that I've had both and uncircumsised in my opinion...was as annoying as hell -_-
annoying?
 

MelziGurl

New member
Jan 16, 2009
1,096
0
0
xDarc said:
MelziGurl said:
xDarc said:
When they blow up... guess what happens? Roll that stuff back and oh my! There's a smooth, shiny glans that puts a gnarly/bumpy cut one to shame.
Just putting it out there that I've had both and uncircumsised in my opinion...was as annoying as hell -_-
annoying?
Yes, annoying as in very big turn off.
 

xDarc

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
1,333
0
41
MelziGurl said:
xDarc said:
MelziGurl said:
xDarc said:
When they blow up... guess what happens? Roll that stuff back and oh my! There's a smooth, shiny glans that puts a gnarly/bumpy cut one to shame.
Just putting it out there that I've had both and uncircumsised in my opinion...was as annoying as hell -_-
annoying?
Yes, annoying as in very big turn off.
Why?
 

nothinghere

New member
Aug 9, 2010
280
0
0
Sporky111 said:
Ciler said:
Sporky111 said:
I was circumcised, I hate it and wish I hadn't been. Oh, but guess what? I can't change it because my parents didn't think I'd need part of my body.
Actually, there is a non-surgical method for foreskin restoration. It sounds like a long and arduous process, but I've read that it works, and those that undergo it do appreciate the results. Maybe something to look into...
I have looked into it, but you can't replace the nerves that were severed. Maybe with stem cells in ten years or so, but currently it's just stretching skin to promote regrowth. Thanks, though. I appreciate it.
it does help regain some pleasure though, because the skin on the glans thickens without the foreskin in order to protect it and having your foreskin restored will reverse that process a bit and help out some, probally not as much as restoring the nerves but it seems from reading some stories it helps quite a bit
 

EllEzDee

New member
Nov 29, 2010
814
0
0
Your pros and cons don't have any factual backing. Either way, it's a stupid practice, and probably makes it feel awkward when it's tucked away and out of use.
 

xDarc

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
1,333
0
41
I'd also wager that countries with the highest rates of circumcision sell more erectile dysfunction meds per capita.
 

Ithera

New member
Apr 4, 2010
447
0
0
Circumcision is an outdated medical practice from a time when people did not know any better. This practice was then incorporated into religious ceremony where the faithful believe God wishes for this offending piece of your body to be cut of and disposed of.

If people wish to hack it of, It should be there choice to make. It will of course hurt a lot more when he is an adult, but why not suffer a little for your faith? Surely a little pain and sacrifice is worth a few God points to the man upstairs? A wise investment for thy divine future.
 

Pinstar

New member
Jul 22, 2009
642
0
0
This was a really tough decision when my son was born last July, but we decided to go ahead and do it. The choice was neutral medically speaking, and religion did not have any effect on the decision. It came down to fitting in. Given that most Americans (of which I am one) have this done, it would a surprise if it wasn't done.

That said, if someone came up to me and said that they didn't have this done on their son, I would respect their choice just as much as if they had it done.

In terms of waiting until you are an adult. I'm glad I got snipped when I was an infant, because the pain and agony of that would be something I don't want lodged in my memory. Where as an infant will not genuinely remember that.
 

marscentral

Where's the Kaboom?
Dec 26, 2009
218
0
0
Snor said:
why is it such an important thing america anyway? I mean its a jewish tradition and america is predominantly christian so...how did that happen
It's not so much for religious reasons, indeed the New Testament repeatedly says that it's unnecessary (there was some debate in the 1st century church as to how much of the Jewish traditions that non-Jewish converts should observe). Although some did believe, quite wrongly, that it prevents masturbation.

Around the beginning of the 20th century, there was some belief that there were medical benefits and it prevents disease. Most of their reasoning was wrong, we were still in the early stages of learning about microorganisms and infection.

All that said, there are legitimate medical reasons to have it done. Mine was medical and given what that was like, I would err on the side of circumcising.