It would be nice. I for one would love to get enough PSN cash to get some neat BlazBlue DLC but I doubt it's going to happen. *sigh*.
No system is full-proof. Saying it was inadequate simply because someone got at it is a little naive.Elamdri said:Yes, and also Sony by not adequately protecting the data.Woodsey said:The people who stole the data are the ones who've wronged people.Elamdri said:What makes you "entitled" by asking someone who's wronged you for compensation?Madara XIII said:Norris IV said:Does anyone else think that sony should provide some sort of compensation for it's users for the risk of private data being taken? seems only fair to me but what does the good men and women of the escapist think?
It would be a nice incentive, but I don't want to sound like an entitled prick asking for more from Sony right after this considerable mishap and damage to the PSN.
If someone robs a bank guarded by only a 90 year old security guard with a BB gun, and the bank had no vault, yeah you blame the bank robber (if you can find him) but it's also the banks fault for not having enough protection.
Sure no system is foolproof, but that doesn't mean that we don't get to judge Sony's measures to determine if they were indeed adequate.Woodsey said:No system is full-proof. Saying it was inadequate simply because someone got at it is a little naive.
Well as far as I'm aware we don't know the full ins and outs of their measures, so we can't.Elamdri said:Sure no system is foolproof, but that doesn't mean that we don't get to judge Sony's measures to determine if they were indeed adequate.Woodsey said:No system is full-proof. Saying it was inadequate simply because someone got at it is a little naive.
That's what discovery is for.Woodsey said:Well as far as I'm aware we don't know the full ins and outs of their measures, so we can't.Elamdri said:Sure no system is foolproof, but that doesn't mean that we don't get to judge Sony's measures to determine if they were indeed adequate.Woodsey said:No system is full-proof. Saying it was inadequate simply because someone got at it is a little naive.
No kidding. The underlying issue is that all computer networks are made by normal people. I'm sure there are plenty of hackers out there (or maybe fired Sony employees) that have more skill than the average Sony staff member. All networks are made by people, all people are flawed, thus all networks are inherently flawed. Sony may have had top-of-the-line security, but all it takes is one person with more skill than whoever is at Sony to get into the network. That's why the US Government is known to hire people who manage to break into their security systems. If there's someone out there who's good enough to break through your security, you want him to be on your payroll.Woodsey said:Well as far as I'm aware we don't know the full ins and outs of their measures, so we can't.Elamdri said:Sure no system is foolproof, but that doesn't mean that we don't get to judge Sony's measures to determine if they were indeed adequate.Woodsey said:No system is full-proof. Saying it was inadequate simply because someone got at it is a little naive.
There are some on their way... http://ps3.ign.com/articles/116/1164392p1.htmlNerf Ninja said:I'm honestly surprised I haven't heard rumblings about class action lawsuits or something, that sort of thing usually turns up with these events.
Easy, you get a couple downloadable games and set the price to 0,00...Sexual Harassment Panda said:Was it 77 million users? How do you bankroll a sorry-gift for that many people?