Okay, if it adds a significant amount of content, I'll buy it. Specific example? The Fallout: New Vegas DLC. Sure, you can probably debate which ones are good or bad quality wise (I very much enjoyed both DLCs for New Vegas) but they do give you a significant amount of gameplay for the price you pay (I realize that you could beat Honest Hearts pretty fast by killing everyone outright). Bad example would be BioWare's DLC, especially the Dragon Age stuff (Except for Awakening, still it was pretty short for a full-priced expansion pack but it was good at least). For Dragon Age DLC pay 10$ and you get a couple hours of content with maybe some new gear but that's about it. Mass Effect 2 was better, but it still came down to the fact that they end up being really short and not worth the cash.NickCaligo42 said:Care to clarify with a couple of examples?AlternatePFG said:If it's good DLC, I usually end up buying it.
This isn't to say anything against those titles in particular, but those are EXACTLY the games I don't want to buy DLC for, because they're already huge and I barely had time to play what was already in them the first time around. There comes a point when a guy really just wants a game to be over, you know?Bara_no_Hime said:Dragon Age, Mass Effect 2, and several others have been the recipients of my extra cash, and I have not regretted it.
I'd argue it got to that point pretty fast. After running through the game with Team Kamiya (Dante, Viewtiful Joe, Amaterasu) a couple of times the novelty of MvC3 wore off for me and I don't see how any extra characters they could provide would liven it up. Yeah, I agree, the new characters should be somewhat interesting at least if they're going to charge that kind of money for it... what they have in the pipeline just doesn't seem appealing.FreelanceButler said:I hope Marvel Vs. Capcom 3 stops being fun before they release more DLC or I'm going to end up wasting all my money a second time.
Luckily I got the Ultimate edition of Dragon Age Origins, so I didn't feel ripped off as much as you. But really, they charge $15 on the Playstation store for the Golem companion. I mean it gives about 30 minutes to 1 hour of gameplay for $15. That is not fair pricing.DanielBrown said:Nope. The one time I actually bought DLC was for Dragon Age: Origins, since I wanted to 100% it(never happened before I got sick of the game). Bought two DLC packs for around 6 euros each and I didn't even get 15 minutes worth of gameplay. I felt ripped off big time.
Soooo these days I ignore DLC.
See, I loved those games, so making them go on longer was great. With Awakening, Shale, and all the others (I've gotten every single DLC for Dragon Age Origins) I doubled the length of gameplay.NickCaligo42 said:This isn't to say anything against those titles in particular, but those are EXACTLY the games I don't want to buy DLC for, because they're already huge and I barely had time to play what was already in them the first time around. There comes a point when a guy really just wants a game to be over, you know?Bara_no_Hime said:Dragon Age, Mass Effect 2, and several others have been the recipients of my extra cash, and I have not regretted it.
That can't really be any DLC, though, can it? If it were significant, I'd figure that it'd be in the finished game.FoolKiller said:Music for rock band and anything that significantly enriches the story.
I understand what your saying and i agree, (I often buy cheap games i don't need on Steam for that reason) but it's a horrible analogy.Bara_no_Hime said:It's like tipping at a Restaurant - if a game is good, I give the developers some extra money. Plus it makes the game longer. It's win-win.