To me, that sounds like a list of reasons to not care about them or what happens to them. I think a strong sense of national identity can cause more problems than it solves, and if the only practical use for something is in warfare, well, then it would be best if we didn't need them at all.Craorach said:Flags are important, they are like a badge that marks us as part of a nation when we wear it.. which is why it annoys me to see the union jack plastered over random clothing, same with other nations flags. Historically, they were literal rallying points for armies, rebellions, freedom fighters and other disparate groups.
You can't just trivialize the destruction of symbols that represent things that people believe in, even if you don't agree with or understand that belief. Surely you can understand the importance of symbols. Think of any of the symbols used in your favorite franchise of choice, be it game, movie, book, or whatever. Wouldn't you be rather upset if someone started burning or otherwise destroying them?dyre said:Come on, man, read context. I was clearly pointing out that burning objects is completely harmless, and we really shouldn't bother with people for doing so when we live in a world where some people destroy human beings, not just flags.canadamus_prime said:So nothing. I was just saying that flags are more than just "pieces of cloth." as you put it.dyre said:Uh, yeah, so? People aren't allowed to say "fuck you" to our nation? We've certainly earned plenty of "fuck you"s.canadamus_prime said:It's more than just a piece of cloth, it's a symbol; and by burning said symbol it's basically like saying "fuck you" to the nation the flag represents.dyre said:It seems mostly pointless. I think it's basically a way for angry people to vent without actually doing anything harmful (or useful).
People who get offended should keep in mind that it's just a piece of cloth that's being burnt, instead of, you know, a human being.
:lTheVioletBandit said:![]()
It happens, there were plenty to choose from.
What's your point? Their hatred of the US and the UK would make them more inclined to sympathize with and possibly join the terrorists, would it not?Woodsey said:That's a rather drastic oversimplification: plenty will have friends and family living in war zones that the US and UK have a tendency of invading.
There's a pretty large leap from burning a flag in protest and blowing yourself up in a suicide bombing. Yes, I'm sure a few would be willing to make the leap, but it's not a case of 'with us or against us'. The difference in the methods is so extreme that to suggest flag burners 'undoubtedly' support mass murderers (or attempted mass murderers) is ridiculous.KingGolem said:What's your point? Their hatred of the US and the UK would make them more inclined to sympathize with and possibly join the terrorists, would it not?Woodsey said:That's a rather drastic oversimplification: plenty will have friends and family living in war zones that the US and UK have a tendency of invading.