Basicly, everyone has to deal with their shit and no one as an easy ride. Add to that the feeling that the grass is always greener on the other side and its obvious that for some reason the other person always seems to have it easier.
Oh the horror! You're right its better to just stay in the house.Baffle said:Be fair, she could be walking the dog and encounter someone wearing the same wellies. Or, worse, walking the same (breed of) dog.DementedSheep said:What the hell? not all of us women are stupid blubbery messes who cry over who wore the same shit and if she bitches and moans so much she can't even walk the dog when she had a bad she can't walk the dog that sounds like in issue with her specifically.
Personally I'm all for ramping up the shame for women who are like that. It should not be encourage or supported.
As another aside they (tampons) are also excellent for soaking up blood (shocking!) and sealing the hole left once the two-way rifle range has been participated in. They even have that nifty applicator to slide in the hole easily if you can't see the wound well, cause it's say in your back.thaluikhain said:I remember a documentary about Royal Marine A&MW commandos being trained. Had a guy talking about the aftermath of a battle, and telling them that it was alright to cry if you've just seen your mates die, forget it being "unmanly".Ryotknife said:I would say it was more confining when i was a teenager. The whole dont show emotions, dont ask for help did hinder me back then. As you get older, you start building up your "like I give a #$%^" stat.
(As an aside, they also carry tampons in their survival kits, cotton wool is good for starting fires. Evidently Royal Marine commandos would never do well in sitcoms, cause they aren't embarrassed by tampons.)
That gave me a good laugh. "OI! One more football lands in my garden and Emma Watson'll come and kick the seven bells out of you!"Baffle said:Almost certain she's not allowed to kill children either, though if that's on the cards maybe I could use her as a boogieman for the kids who keep kicking footballs into my garden.
I'd like to add the modern entertainment trope that men, by and large, are blithering idiots. In recent years, it's gone from being simply ignorant of certain roles or concepts to being so incapable of functioning you start to wonder how these people lived before they got married (that's the satire in Peter Griffin being actually classified as mentally retarded), which, especially with the "not good with children" idea, reinforces the stereotype of unfit parenthood that we see demonstrated in real life.renegade7 said:I really wish "Men's Rights" didn't have such an aggressive and hostile connotation. There are really are gender issues facing men that are a result of their being male and even though they ultimately have the same origins as the gender issues that women face there has not been equal progress in eliminating them.
The first point is the family gender roles men have to face. If you make less than your wife, people look down on you regardless of what your job is, and even the woman is affected by these roles. If you're over 30 and not married, good luck getting a raise or promotion at work: society considers unmarried men immature and untrustworthy. Even worse if you don't have kids.
And it's a double whammy of suck, because half of all marriages end in divorce. And that's NEVER good news for a man: even if you make substantially less than your wife, you're STILL going to be making "maintenance" payments and lose custody of your children. Maybe that's justified in some cases, but I can't believe that it's justified in all: divorce court proceedings are heavily unbalanced against men.
The modern face of depression is that of a woman. You NEVER see men in ads for anti-depressants, you rarely see male advocates for mental and emotional health, and while a teenage girl with ADHD is going to be written off as playful and imaginative, a teenage boy with ADHD is considered stupid. Men face depression just as much as women do, but because society says that it's "unmanly" to acknowledge your emotions they're told to stay quiet about it.
And the same goes for eating disorders. Turns out, teenage males have eating and body image disorders just as frequently as females. But because "body image" has ended up labeled a female issue, I doubt we're going to be seeing similar awareness campaigns for men's anxiety issues any time soon.
Prostate and testicular cancer claim similar numbers of lives as ovarian and breast cancer. Yet, funding for those two is several orders of magnitude less.
Male genital mutilation remains acceptable, in fact in some cases even desirable, in the US. Some traditional subcultures in the US even go so far as to perform the mutilation by BITING the foreskin off.
Homosexual men and boys are treated with far more hostility than homosexual women and girls.
Now, even though feminism is touched upon in a few of those, this was a statement of just a few of the issues that men face, not an attack on feminism or an attempt to provoke yet another round of "who's got it worse: feminism/MRA edition". Actually, feminism and progress towards gender equality for females is what has helped to start the male rights movement: horror stories of female genital cutting have been a primary driver in activism against male genital mutilation. If we didn't have women in the first place saying that maybe it isn't necessary to follow the traditional role of never working and being little more than a brood queen, then we wouldn't have men coming to similar realizations about the possibility of shaking off similarly backwards gender roles. SOMEONE had to get the ball rolling on eliminating unwanted gender roles, and in this case it just happened to be women.
So I agree with Watson. We need to acknowledge that men face social issues directly related to their being men, and we need to deal with them.
You completely missed the point. Her point is that there are prejudices against men as well, and that they're equally as stupid as the prejudices against women! There's literally no valid argument for keeping these outdates and moronic expectations when we should just let people do what they want to do.Nion said:I'm not really seeing why people are praising Emma Watsons speech so much. She, and the organization the speech is for, is basically going "I can see that men are hurting, but you know what would be really great? If you'd all man up and focus on fixing women's problems."
Come on, Guppy! You can't request civility while simultaneously threatening scrotal-centric violence. It's just...uncouth!BloatedGuppy said:THREAD REQUEST: Keep the any debate civil. First mention of "SJW" earns 20 crotch punches.
And she's making this point to launch a campaign that seeks to "bring together one half of humanity in support of the other of humanity". This is explicitly not a campaign that's going to support any men, help any men or fix any problems faced by men. It's a call for men to support women, but not the other way around.mitchell271 said:You completely missed the point. Her point is that there are prejudices against men as well, and that they're equally as stupid as the prejudices against women! There's literally no valid argument for keeping these outdates and moronic expectations when we should just let people do what they want to do.