Poll: Fallout 3
- Thread starter coolman9899
- Start date
I always go the good route. It usually fits the story better. It just doesn't make sense to be an evil fucker but still save the world and do sidequests for people.
When it comes to dialogue options and civilian murder, good, but that doesn't keep me from breaking into people's houses and stealing their things.
Evil. I get more money by killing, stealing, and intimidating everybody in the game. I then use that money to buy better guns and armor. Therefore the game becomes much easier and my character becomes much more beastly if I choose the evil path.
Also, I enjoy watching children flee from me in games like Fable (slightly off-topic, but the OP mentioned in other games too).
Also, I enjoy watching children flee from me in games like Fable (slightly off-topic, but the OP mentioned in other games too).
It's not that I like to play evil. The simple fact is that people tend not to like it when I massacre a whole town, or rob their house, or buy it from them and hike up the price. But, that's just them being narrow-minded...
If your good you can't sneak into houses and pickpocket people then leave a grenade there o.o also just shooting up towns and blowing up people and did I mention blowing up people? Oh and every other game if your not evil (like in RDR and Fable) you don't get the best things like the evil horse or that one sword at the end of Fable where you can run into a town and just stand there swining your sword killing every single thing around you... yah that was fun, I kinda wished I had one in real life.....
I find for most Karma games I play a good character for my first run through...though with little hiccups of evil...or for example I get bored and slaughter Underworld....
Then I make an Evil character...and I end up levelling up so much faster!
Then I make an Evil character...and I end up levelling up so much faster!
I was a Neo Confederate I did what was best for my Country whether it was good or evil, thou mainly good. The Brotherhood helped me so I had to help them.
I have a bit of a good guy complex in most games so im currently working on red dead redemption without ever breaking the law.
not bloody easy.
not bloody easy.
usually it's play good through first (which is pretty much like playing the game it was 'meant' to be played) and then with whatever I do post first runthrough is somewhere between evil and neutral. I like to try and be as creative as possible, if the game allows it. I think I had the most fun as pure evil, though, by trying to sandman kill as many characters as possible. Levels you up way fast too, so you don't need to repeat a lot of the missions that are been there, done that. I find a lot of the replayability is either about taking out the various fortresses or towns, or trying to explore whatever you've missed.
As for morality, though, I'm tired of the comic book pure good or pure evil in RPGs. Feels more like a two linear RPGs packaged into one, but still, the expansiveness of Fallout 3 makes up for it. ME2 has a great story, but it's told the same way whether you're a boy scout or a dick. However, that your characters are actually at risk in the final mission is great innovation. Honestly, though, I'm tired of change taking so long in games, which is why I'm veering away from RPGs at the moment.
As for morality, though, I'm tired of the comic book pure good or pure evil in RPGs. Feels more like a two linear RPGs packaged into one, but still, the expansiveness of Fallout 3 makes up for it. ME2 has a great story, but it's told the same way whether you're a boy scout or a dick. However, that your characters are actually at risk in the final mission is great innovation. Honestly, though, I'm tired of change taking so long in games, which is why I'm veering away from RPGs at the moment.
This. Nobody (except the slaves) left alive.Polaris19 said:
I usually try to play neutral, but it seems really odd killing innocent people, then helping others the next.
