Stickyreiss said:
Pyro Paul said:
there is a diffrence between thinking a gun shouldn't fire and knowing a gun can't fire.
as my dad once taught me: "learn the diffrence between a paper weight and a gun, and never forget it."
You just don't do it, and you're the first person I've known who's challenged that, you just don't do it. thats as far as I'm willing to discuss because so far it's been
you: theres a difference between a show gun and a real one
Me: you still treat them the same
you: theres a difference between a show gun and a real one
Me: you still treat them the same
you: theres a difference between a show gun and a real one
Me: you still treat them the same
we arent getting anywhere
[/discussion]
they are handling a paper weight shaped like a gun.
so there is nothing really wrong with what they are doing.
i challenge it because i was taught to not be stupid.
making blind assumptions that defy logic is just that.
i have a marlin that has no firing chamber, no bolt, no feed.
it is mearly a barrel, trigger, magazine and hammer.
i treat it like a paper weight because that is what it is. there is no chance that weapon is going to magically load a bullet and fire it while it lacks all of those things and to presume that it is capable of doing that and treating it like that is just stupid.