I did read the books and was quite underwhelmed by most of them. The third book ends halfway through, I was really pissed that there was so much more book left over, after everything had ended. But that's one thing I never really liked about Tolken was just how much his books rambled on. I know that's the reason a lot of people liked his books but I found it tedious. The 2nd book in LOTR is the one I liked the most, tho I admit I loved the bit in Moria, and all the bits with the dwarfs, but that's the thing in the last book Gimli did nothing, the support characters didn't get to do anything but stand around and look pretty, and that really kinda bugged me. In the first and second book the characters seemed to matter more, so I liked them a lot better. But for me The Hobbit is my favorite work of Tolkens. The major events felt major because Tolken wrote them well, and you really got a sense of wonder as Bilbo went to all these different places and took in the sights. It benefited a lot from only having one perspective, and leaving out some major things that happened, because Bilbo didn't see them. All the wondrous things in the Hobbit felt wondrous because you were seeing them through the eyes of Bilbo Baggins, rather than the narrated feel that the other 3 books had. And if things did feel narrated, there was a kind of feel that Bilbo was narrating. That gave it a much closer feel. All in All The Hobbit is my favorite book. But I just don't get into Lord of the Rings so much. I'll give you, I liked the first two books, but the third book I just hate.