Angerwing said:
Holy hell, thats bordering on Stalker level there. Thats just creepy, and also unfair, since thats a different thread, on a different topic, with a different opinion and frame of mind. But oka, we'll play this fiddle and have our duet.
First I should say that my Apostrophe is somewhat broken, so thats why (usually) none of my posts have apostrophes in them, and its just easier to go through. Also, thats grammar, not spelling, so lets get off the high horse and take a basic english class. With the exception of Dotn (in the post you pulled out of another thread) I spelled every word right, I just didnt use the correct word.
Now, as the the quote you grabbed, again, its the pettiness the rest of the world feels it needs to have just so it can change the US to its standards. Again, I dont see the US pushing the dollar on anyone, even though currently the dollar IS getting stronger, and is actually better economically then most places. Plus, it fits, because the OP doesnt like the Imperial system, and you in fact actually proved my point. Metric is the woman in this occasion. As soon as you go against it, all hell breaks loose and you are clearly in the wrong. Bet if I made a thread calling out all the short comings of Metric and all about how you dont need a base ten system to do easy mathematical things. So thanks for proving my point. Even though I dont believe its right to go grabbing posts from other threads on individuals through what was on the level of stalking.
So tell me this, if I ran through your posts, would I find "contradictory" information that I could use out of context here?
Anyway, thats not spelling that I got wrong in those examples. Thats again grammar. If you note, I spelled everyone of those words right. So your argument falls apart rather quickly.
Now, as to it being "undeniable" how do you explain those in this thread who have also said that they liked to use miles over kilometers in both distance and speed? Or how I even had a person say they liked metric liked the Imperial way for weight? Care to explain, possibly? Are you saying that their opinions are illogical, and wrong? Because if you are, I hope you quote everyone one of them and give them the same lecture. Please o' please do so, because if not, you're just the pot calling the kettle black.
Also, it is relevant about the dollar and its lack of forcible change. Metric is something used by some and not by others. The dollar is something used by some, not by others. Its called a comparison. And it does work, and if you'd like to tell me how it doesnt, I'd love to hear how, since you didnt give a reason.
Alright. So... everyone is entitled to an opinion. Just as long as its what the majority thinks is what youre telling me. Because I'm supposed to respect that you just called my preferred measurement of choice archaic and arbitrary, yet when I saw that I enjoy using it, I get a lecture on how wrong I am. Oka, I see how this works. And I see. I'm being better. When the title of this thread is:
I hate the imperial system. America, I'm looking at you! Give it up, metric is simply better!!!!
Yep. No pettiness there.
Or in here:
ApeShapeDeity said:
Imperial measurement is crap.
ApeShapeDeity said:
Why can't the rest of America just get on board with the rest of the world?
ApeShapeDeity said:
In short, imperial sucks. Let it die.
Yeah, theres certainly no pettiness there.
Also, side note. The -our thing is a more regional thing. And if you type it in on an American computer, it will say its misspelled. Just so you know. So whether you spell it (or any other word like it) -or or -our, its right either way.
And finally, if you want me to prove my point, tell me this. If I were to make a thread that said Metric wasnt as easy or necessary as people made it out to be (as was shown in programming example using base 16, binary, and how days and broken on a scale of 60 seconds = 60 minutes = 1 hour. Which then goes to 12 hrs. = half a day = 2(12)=24 hrs. = 1 day) dont you think metric users would come and tell me about I'm wrong? How would that be any different then what I posted defending my choice and right to use imperial (standard) system?
More so example is 52 weeks in a year 12 months in a year (neither divisible by 10) with months that run on a 28(29)/30/31 day scale (usually alternating except for three times during the year and when the year changes to a new one)? If you dont understand (it is kinda confusing to read that way), it means the months run like this:
-31
-28 (29 on leap year)
-31
-30
-31
-30
-31
-31
-30
-31
-30
-31
And that these months are split into 4-5 weeks (not divisible by ten), with each week having 7 days (not divisible by ten) which runs back into the 1 day = 24 hr. -> 1 hr. = 60 minutes -> 1 minute = 60 seconds format. None of which is necessarily divisible by ten, since most divide by 4 into 15 or sometimes by 12 into 5.
So, seeing that, and how you run on a base system of 12 to tell time and a system of 52 weeks which is divisible by 4 (a multiple of 12) and how over half the months arent divisible by 10. Especially when they are broken up into 4-5 weeks that are made up of 7 days. No where does the base of 10 come up, only the base system of 12 (which is what the imperial or standard system runs on).
So there alone, Metric is unreasonable. Care to prove how it isnt? And why, showing that you must use the standard base 12 system to tell time and the date, though you can change between measuring in imperial or metric, imperial is obviously superior, because it runs time. and time cant be changed or converted (especially since there are 24 time zones, which is a base 12).
Lets hear it metric.