Ah well, I thought you were referring to more modern history. I profess to know very little about Canada during the British Empire, though the way you present it does sound fascinating. I'm currently writing two different papers at the minute but maybe in the summer months we could return to the topic and try and investigate it further.Yankeedoodles said:What I meant by that was that back when Canada was much more a part of the British Empire a Canadian could not become a member of parliament and speak as representative of a district of Canadians. Even if Canada was well governed (which to my understanding it was) it was governed not treated as an equal part of a greater whole the way say Rhode Island is in the United States. Regardless of how British a Canadian may have felt during that time they were effectively a lesser citizen as long as they remained in Canada. Kind of like a resident of Puerto Rico is in relation to the United States. And regardless of how British Canada may have been, to my understanding there was never any move to actually fully integrate them into some sort of expanded United Kingdom likely because Canada would represent a majority in Parliament. On the contrary, Britain started to sever ties with Canada in the late nineteenth century to preserve that 'British' majority.And it was that decision to eject Canada from the British Empire rather than bestowing them with truly full British citizenship which leads me to believe that Canadians hold Britain in far higher regard than it deserves. Honestly, I don't know why Canadians put up with it for so long. When it became clear that Britain had no intention of treating us like equals we Americans revolted.
The main article of the one you offered me states that the plan was to have the navy occupy and dominate the baltic for three months, preventing naval trade routes, after which it was hoped Sweden would offer a port. If the Swedish didn't offer said port then the navy would withdraw. It never mentions an invasion of Sweden. A reason for not enacting it was, as you pointed out, to avoid motivating the Axis powers, however, the entire concept was rendered pointless when Nazi Germany invaded Denmark and Norway, providing land-based trade routes (as you said, fuckin' toll booths wouldn't have worked).iLikeHippos said:Well, Britain would have to get in to Sweden if they would want to block the trade routes to Germany, otherwise it wouldn't work. It's not like they could set up fuckin' tolls and have Sweden yell at them. The Germans would tear their shit up.
And, one of the main reason it was never made and indeed merely proposed, was because they didn't wish to motivate the Axis allies (Italy, Japan) to push any more forward.
I'd say it's a pretty reasonable conclusion.
Well indeed. Though it's not exactly going to go down as the bloodiest invasion in the history of mankind. A bunch of untrained sailors turning up and saying "erm...have you got any germans?" barely constitutes an invasion. We were only stopping the Nazis, we didn't keep it. Promise.Chefodeath said:Naw, the English never invaded Sweden. Iceland was more their game.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Iceland
I'll side with the country with one of the best trained special forces in the world, the European union behind it and that's a ***** too attack because it's an island.ryai458 said:Doesn't matter America wins.
You pretty much ninja'd me in a more elaborate fashion. And the nuclear missiles launch if Radio 4 transmission is lost as that is the official broadcast of the country that will keep going and will be the last one to be terminated in the event of an invasion. No, seriously.ThisIsSnake said:I'm English but isn't very clear cut. What's the motivation?
Are we being invaded by America because...
They want our oh so valuable land?
They want revenge against us for the original colonisation?
We suddenly become a terrorist nation?
We suddenly become a fascist nation?
They have an issue with our leadership?
Have to say the last one is the only one I'd side with America for, anything to remove Cameron.
We are also potentially backed up by,
India - Nuclear Power, former colony
Australia - former prison/colony
Canada - Nuclear Power, former colony
France - Our bestest buddy after America
Scotland - Fellow constituent country
Northern Ireland - Fellow constituent country
Wales - Fellow constituent country
Germany - Nuclear Power, fellow EU country, Has economic and industrial regeneration abilities of Deadpool
Potentially the rest of the EU
Potentially Russia and China (attempting an opportunist attack against the US)
We also have nukes in the North Sea that launch if they lose contact with 10 Downing Street (or the HoP, can't remember), the SAS(The modern special forces blueprint) and the most dangerous weapon of all, dry humour.
Yea... I'm american, so I'm gonna side with america. The number of ways we have to stomp on a country of that size (especially since they're an island) isn't even funny.ryai458 said:Doesn't matter America wins.