Lump of cells. Rip it out as one would a cancer.
Edit: Amusingly the poll results look like a penis.
Edit: Amusingly the poll results look like a penis.
I've heard several people throw around the term sentience, and I'm not picking on you, just using you as an example. But we don't have a clear cut definition for sentience. As of yet it is a purely philosophical entity, open to interpretation of the person at the moment. You can't base an arguement on an ever changing basis of evalutation.dathwampeer said:Until it becomes sentient I don't class it as a human. It is most definetely not murder in my opinion.
1.she can put it up for adoptiontellmeimaninja said:So you'd punish the child by allowing it to be born to an irresponsible mother?mraustindude19 said:i think a abortion is ok IF the woman was raped so she won't have a child to look at and remember that time.
ITS NOT RIGHT FOR A WOMAN WHO GOES CLUBING EVERY DAY TO FUCK EVERY MAN IN PLAIN SIGHT TO GET ONE JUST BECAUSE SHE IS A IRRESPONSIBLE WHORE,WHO WON'T FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF HER ACTIONS.
I voted simply to see if it did. (See: my last post) Voted no simply because I'm for legalising abortion.Loop Stricken said:Lump of cells. Rip it out as one would a cancer.
Edit: Amusingly the poll results look like a penis.
honestly, this is the biggest problem with christians. they have a completely naive belief in the importance of human beings. humans are animals. you are not different, you are not fucking special, you are not a magic star child.gamerguy473 said:But that's not the point, the point is that it is a person in development. As for the argument made before about putting animals down. They're animals. Not people. There is a HUGE difference. A fetus is a person in the making.MKScorpion said:Yes, but it's not "complete." Also, some could probably get an abortion before week 4.gamerguy473 said:How is it now alive? Did you know that by week 4 the baby already has a heart and a circulatory system?MKScorpion said:Technically, it's not alive, so no.
I assume you are pro-murdering people who are in comas then? Since they are not independent and require other people to survive. Actually, pro killing anyone who couldn't survive independently?soapyshooter said:If it was taken out of the mother it would die. So technically it isn't human or anything viable for that matter. It is not murder. Once the baby can survive outside of the mother it becomes illegal to abort or kill because that point it does become murder.gamerguy473 said:How is it now alive? Did you know that by week 4 the baby already has a heart and a circulatory system? And the heart starts beating by week 5?MKScorpion said:Technically, it's not alive, so no.
Weather or not it can feel pain isn't proof for or against consciousness. I never said it had to have consciousness for me to consider it alive either, so your arguing something totally irrelevant to this conversation. I'm not having that argument.BGH122 said:Here you go [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_debate#Fetal_pain_debate].Eldarion said:Prove to me that it in fact lacks sentience or consciousness(you can't). Thats assuming I accept those as qualifications for life.BGH122 said:Because you'd have to show how something lacking sentience or consciousness is 'alive'.Eldarion said:You could give me some argument about weather or not a fetus is "alive" at what stage, but since that is a matter of opinion rather than scientific fact and my opinion is that its alive from the start then abortion is in my view of the concept murder.
The foetus can't even feel pain until the third trimester. I think a large part of the problem here is that anti-abortionists are seeing 'consciousness' as a meta-physical thing, like the soul, which it isn't. Consciousness requires a well-formed brain and since pain receptors aren't even formed by 24 weeks we can presume complex reasoning isn't either.
Ha, Nice one.Loop Stricken said:Edit: Amusingly the poll results look like a penis.
If they have eyes and ears and can kick the foetus is too far along for abortion to be legal unless the mother's life is in danger. That argument does not hold water. Elaborate.gamerguy473 said:I personally think it is murder. Lumps of flesh don't have ears and eyes, and they don't swallow and have the ability to kick you while in the womb.
Using your argument, explain why these are morally acceptable exceptions?Eldarion said:There are a few exceptions, rape or if the birth threatens the life of the mother I can understand.
Woah! This isn't about 'wimmin's rights', I don't think (bar rape) any woman should have the right to abort a foetus unless the father signs off on it too (and whoever refuses to sign off on the abortion has the duty to raise the child). This is about what it means to be alive. So far you've provided no more of an argument than "it's alive because that's my opinion" and that's just invalid. Saying "that's my opinion" is less than worthless in a debate since the purpose of a debate is to ascertain an agreed-upon truth which two originally disagreeing parties can agree upon.Eldarion said:Why exactly do you all feel so strongly for a womans right to abort a fetus anyway? What gives anyone that right? A woman has a right to choose weather or not she has a baby, but I say she made that choice when she had sex. Even with birth control you are still risking pregnancy, even if by less than 1% chance. Why have sex if you can't accept the consequences of your actions? Thats what the pro abortion stance is. Its just enabling bad judgement. After all why should you have to deal with the consequences of your decisions right?
In the case of the mothers life being threatened, I just feel the life of a person is worth more than a potential person. That does not mean its acceptable if the mother life isn't in danger.RMcD94 said:Using your argument, explain why these are morally acceptable exceptions?Eldarion said:There are a few exceptions, rape or if the birth threatens the life of the mother I can understand.
Bravo!!! you hit the nail on the head!grimsprice said:Its not murder.gamerguy473 said:I personally think it is murder. Lumps of flesh don't have ears and eyes, and they don't swallow and have the ability to kick you while in the womb.
98% of fetus's are aborted well before 20 weeks, and most before 10. Its not until 24 weeks that brain function has a probability of existing (some start slightly later or earlier but not by much).
Before that its no different than killing a tumor. Its just cellular growth. If you play the "what it is going to be" card, then masturbation is mass genocide.
Science. Listen well children. It works bitches.